similar to: disable auto-negotiation gigabit ethernet

Howdy: This is (at least slightly) off-topic, but I've seen more knowledgeable folks than I mention autonegotiation in this venue and, since I didn't get any response on the vortex-bugs mailing list, I thought I'd ask here (also, the interface in question supports samba so...). And there should be some good news for some folks too. If this is old news, sorry (I've been too busy

> -----Original Message----- > From: Travis Johnson [mailto:tlj@ida.net] > Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 1:05 PM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7940/7960 ethernet ports > [...] > We are having a problem with Cisco 7940 and 7960 phones when > the PC is plugged into the 2nd ethernet port on the phone. It > will drop the

I have just noticed this message in my kernel logs, reporting the possibility of an error with my memory. This would go a long way towards explaining the problems i''ve been having. This particular error is occuring when i''m not running xen so is obviously not something brought on by xen itself. The strange thing is that the NMI error is always followed by the TLAN: eth0: Adaptor

Hello all I am setting up a Centos 6 machine with one network card & one onboard network port. Both are recognized & work. Onboard Network port is unused yet, but is required for dedicated access to LTSP LAN, which would allow older PIII machines to boot from this system. I have installed LTSP but again Networking seems to be the problem area, as the clients won't boot from this

Hai Roy, I had a good look and most look ok, not much exiting going on but still a few points. >From teh logs. Feb 5 08:41:48 pi4b ifup[303]: ifup: couldn't open interfaces file "/etc/network/interfaces": No such file or directory So re-create the file with the folling content, : /etc/network/interfaces And add : # This file describes the network interfaces available on

Hallo, I have running xen-4.2/linux-3.8 (compiled) on any hosts. - dell pe r720: drac, eth0-3:igb squeeze -> boot_xen:ok net:ok bridge:ok - dell pe R620: drac=eth0, eth1-3:tg3 wheezy -> boot_xen:ok net:ok bridge:fail So i running "xend start" (or "xenbridges start") on my patient (R620 with broadcom tg3) network will be lost: RTNETLINK answers: File exists

We've just moved one a new server from our sever room, where I built it, to the datacenter. We want to force autoneg off, and tell it gigabit and full duplex. Using ethtool, I get no errors setting the speed or duplex. HOWEVER, autoneg on works... and autoneg off utterly refuses to work, and gives: ethtool -s eth0 autoneg off Cannot set new settings: Invalid argument not setting autoneg

Thank you very much for reply. Our test team insists on simulating network failure by using ifdown instead of just unpluging the cable. I have to modify the event script 10.interface. When noticing a NIC failure, CTDB just marks the NIC down and do not try to pull it up. It seems to work fine. -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Martin Schwenke [mailto:martin at meltin.net] 发送时间: 2016年9月18日 18:49 收件人: Weidong

Hello, Marvel Yukon Gigabit Ethernet is supported by CentOS ? -- -- Devel in Precio http://www.pas-world.com

On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 01:36:20 +0000, Weidong via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > If eth0 holds virtual IP as its secondary IP and I bring down eth0 by > command "ifdown eth0", CTDB will automatically pull eth0 up. Sometime > it goes wrong. The virtual IP becomes primary IP, and origin primary > IP turns into a secondary IP or just missing. If the origin

Hello all, I have a CentOS box that has a NIC (eth0) on which I defined 4 VLAN's (counting the NIC itself): eth0, eth0.1, eth0.2 and eht0.3. Initially the Cisco switch was not partitioned into VLAN's which means that the only VLAN running on it was the default one (VLAN 1). I have then played with VLAN's a bit on the switch and at this point have two: VLAN 1 (which is default and can

I have a series of static routes in route-eth0 Recently I had to made changes and could not find an effective way to get the old routes out and the new routes in. ifdown-route seems to apply the content of route-eth0 to take down the routes listed and ifup-route brings up routes based on route- So what ends up is that the old routes never go away, just new routes added. ifdown eth0; ifup

hi i''ve not found many hints on shorewall/ucarp/conntrackd topic. i''m sharing this with the list, so that i''m able to search and find it the next time. :) i''ve setup 2 identical systems with shorewall, ucarp and conntrackd in an active/backup way. ucarp just calls ifup/ifdown, all network configuration is maintained in /etc/network/interfaces (Debian),

hi, I have to configure Xen server and DomU''s which should be able to talk to different vlans - depending on services put on DomU''s. I would like to enslave 2 NICs via bond interface. Both NICs are on trunk ports which are configured in the same way, the same native vlan. I don''t know, if I have to add vlans tagging to eth* interfaces then enslave tagged eth*

I've made 3 CentOS 7 installation attempts to configure a simple firewall/router box with 2 nics. I got myself into a circular scenario where NetworkManager and firewalld and /etc/sysconfig/network-scrpts/ifcfg-***** were interfering or overwriting each other. Needed to perform ifdown enp3s7 on the internal LAN nic in order to make the external internet enp2s0 reach websites and ping

I figured I should post this because before I went to do it I searched the web for caveats etc and didn''t really find much. So anyway, I set up bonding + vlan for a project. Computer is dell powerdge 350 with 2 intel 82559 10/100 nic running stock 2.4.20. I tried both the eepro100 and the e100 drivers for the nics, both work 802.1q and bonding are modules. Switch is cisco 2924xl-en

If eth0 holds virtual IP as its secondary IP and I bring down eth0 by command "ifdown eth0", CTDB will automatically pull eth0 up. Sometime it goes wrong. The virtual IP becomes primary IP, and origin primary IP turns into a secondary IP or just missing. If the origin primary IP is missing, I have to run "ifup eth0" though CTDB has pulled eth0 up. CTDB uses “ip link set eth0

Hello there, Sorry for resurrecting such an old discussion, but I just stumbled upon the same problem. 2007/4/14, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>: > On 14/4/07 07:56, "Erdem Bayer" <ebayer@ttnet.net.tr> wrote: > > Also should there also be a qemu-ifdown script to undo the changes? > Not needed. Everything should tear down automatically when the qemu

On 13 February 2017 at 15:35, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > My manager tells me a system in the datacenter is down. I go down there, > and plug in a monitor-on-a-stick and keyboard. It's up, but no network. I > try systemctl restart NetworkManager several times, and ip a shows *no* > change. > > Finally, I do an ifdown, followed by an ifup, and everything's

Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I have a series of static routes in route-eth0 > > Recently I had to made changes and could not find an effective way to > get the old routes out and the new routes in. > > ifdown-route seems to apply the content of route-eth0 to take down the > routes listed and ifup-route brings up routes based on route- > > So what ends up is that the old