Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "SE from nleqslv"
2017 Jun 11
1
Memory leak in nleqslv()
Hello all,
I am relatively new to R, but enjoying it very much. I am hoping that
someone on this list can help me with an issue I am having.
I am having issues with iterations over nleqslv, in that the solver
does not appear to clean up memory used in previous iterations. I
believe I've isolated the/my issue in a small sample of code:
library(nleqslv)
cons_ext_test <- function(x){
2017 Jun 12
2
Possible with enableJIT function
In this email to the R-help list: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2017-June/447474.html
and in this question on Stackoverflow: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44486643/nleqslv-memory-use-in-r
Andrew Leach has raised a question about the memory usage of my package nleqslv.
In a model with a loop within a function he has experienced continuously increasing memory usage
by package nleqslv
2017 Feb 09
3
Ancient C /Fortran code linpack error
> > On 9 Feb 2017, at 16:00, G?ran Brostr?m <goran.brostrom at umu.se> wrote:
> >
> > In my package 'glmmML' I'm using old C code and linpack in the optimizing procedure. Specifically, one part of the code looks like this:
> >
> > F77_CALL(dpoco)(*hessian, &bdim, &bdim, &rcond, work, info);
> > if (*info == 0){
> >
2012 Dec 04
1
Solve system of equations (nleqslv) only returns origin
I'm solving 4 complex equations simultaneously. Code is below. The code
returns only zero's for the solution though there should also be a non-zero
result. I'm pretty confident that the equations are correct because they
are straight from a published paper and I checked them pretty thoroughly.
The parameter values I used are from the published paper as well. Any
suggestions for how
2017 Feb 10
1
Ancient C /Fortran code linpack error
> On 10 Feb 2017, at 14:53, G?ran Brostr?m <goran.brostrom at umu.se> wrote:
>
> Thanks to all who answered my third question. I learned something, but:
>
> On 2017-02-09 17:44, Martin Maechler wrote:
>>
>>>> On 9 Feb 2017, at 16:00, G?ran Brostr?m <goran.brostrom at umu.se> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> In my package 'glmmML'
2017 Aug 09
2
Package nleqslv ERROR
Dear all,
I am relatively new to R and have had some difficulty in understanding an error i get when running a code to solve a system of non-linear equations, with four equations and two variables.
This is my code:
ALPHA <- c(-0.0985168033402, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25, 0.3, 0.35, 0.4)
BETA <- c(-0.0985168033402, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25, 0.3, 0.35, 0.4)
GAMMA <- c(0.3940672148378, 0.1, 0.15,
2017 Aug 09
0
Package nleqslv ERROR
Santi,
In the second line of your function you have the following:
f <- numeric(length(x))
This sets the length of this numeric vector (i.e., "f") to the length of the vector "x".
Later, inside the function you assign to values to 4 elements of the vector "f".
This assumes that "f" is at least 4 element in length.
However, you define
2009 Mar 17
3
Non-Linear Optimization - Query
Dear All,
I couple of weeks ago, I’ve asked for a package recommendation for nonlinear
optimization. In my problem I have a fairly complicated non-linear objective
function subject to one non-linear equality constrain.
I’ve been suggested to use the *Rdonlp2* package, but I did not get any
results after running the program for 5 hrs. Is it normal to run this type
of programs for hours? Also,
2017 Feb 09
3
Ancient C /Fortran code linpack error
In my package 'glmmML' I'm using old C code and linpack in the
optimizing procedure. Specifically, one part of the code looks like this:
F77_CALL(dpoco)(*hessian, &bdim, &bdim, &rcond, work, info);
if (*info == 0){
F77_CALL(dpodi)(*hessian, &bdim, &bdim, det, &job);
........
This usually works OK, but with an ill-conditioned data
2010 Apr 29
1
BB package
Hi I would like to solve a system of nonlinear equations below using dfsane function
mn <- 142.36; vr <- 9335.69 ; sk <- 0.81; kur <- 0.25
test_fn <- function(p)
{ f <- rep(NA, length(p))
f[1] <- p[1]*(p [2]+p[3])- mn
f[2] <- - vr + 2*p[1]*p[2]*p[3]*(p[4]-1)+p[1]*(p[2]+p[3])^2
f[3] <- - sk + (p[1]*(p [2]+p[3])^3*(p[1]+1)*(p[1]+2)-6*p[1]*p[2]*p[3]*(p[2]+
2010 Nov 21
1
solve nonlinear equation using BBsolve
Hi r-users,
I would like to solve system of nonlinear equation using BBsolve function and
below is my code. I have 4 parameters and I have 4 eqns.
mgf_gammasum <- function(p)
{
t <- rep(NA, length(p))
mn <- 142.36
vr <- 9335.69
sk <- 0.8139635
kur <- 3.252591
rh <- 0.896
# cumulants
k1 <- p[1]*(p[2]+p[3])
k2 <- p[1]*(2*p[2]*p[3]*p[4] +p[2]^2+p[3]^2)
k3 <-
2017 Aug 11
0
Package nleqslv ERROR
Just to set things straight:
The error message "Error in nleqslv(xstart, fun) : Length of fn result <> length of x!"
is issued by the underlying nleqslv C function.
<fn> refers to the second argument of function nleqslv which is named fn.
It is not issued by R itself.
Other have already pointed out how to resolve the error.
Berend Hasselman
2017 Jun 13
0
Possible with enableJIT function
Thanks. This should be resolved in R-devel(r72788) and R-patched
(r72789)
Best,
luke
On Mon, 12 Jun 2017, Berend Hasselman wrote:
>
>
> In this email to the R-help list: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2017-June/447474.html
> and in this question on Stackoverflow: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44486643/nleqslv-memory-use-in-r
>
> Andrew Leach has raised a question
2014 Aug 25
3
dubious behaviour of match.arg() with nested functions.
Dear all,
I initially ran into this problem while rebuilding a package dependent on
nleqslv. I got the following error:
Error in match.arg(global) : 'arg' must be of length 1
This didn't occur in previous versions of nleqslv, but did in the current
one (2.4). I think I pinned the problem down to the following example:
Take two functions:
test <-
2010 Mar 11
4
help about solving two equations
I have two matrix s1 and s2, each of them is 1000*1.
and I have two equations:
digamma(p)-digamma(p+q)=s1,
digamma(q)-digamma(p+q)=s2,
and I want to sovle these two equations to get the value of x and y, which are also two 1000*1 matrices.
I write a program like this:
f <- function(x) {
p<- x[1]; q <- x[2];
((digamma(p)-digamma(p+q)-s1[2,]) )^2 +((digamma(q)-digamma(p+q)-s2[2,]) )^2
2012 Sep 09
1
Solving a system of two equations
Hi,
I am trying to find a simple way to numerically solve a system of two
equations equal to zero with two unknowns (x_loc and y_loc). Here is a mock
data set and below it, the equations I need to solve.
theta<-c(180,135,90)/(2*pi)
x<-c(0,0,15)
y<-c(20,0,0)
0 =
-sum((y_loc-y)*(sin(theta)*(x_loc-x)-cos(theta)*(y_loc-y))/(((x_loc-x)^2+(y_loc-y)^2)^0.5)^3)
0 =
2010 Sep 02
3
Simultaneous equations
Dear all,
I am relatively new to R and have had some difficulty in understanding the
user manual for a package that I have downloaded to evaluate non-linear
simultaneous equations.
The package is called systemfit.
Does anyone have any experience of this package?
What I am trying to do is solve a non linear simultaneous equations...
Could anyone give me an example (please) of the code that
2017 Feb 10
0
Ancient C /Fortran code linpack error
Thanks to all who answered my third question. I learned something, but:
On 2017-02-09 17:44, Martin Maechler wrote:
>
>>> On 9 Feb 2017, at 16:00, G?ran Brostr?m <goran.brostrom at umu.se> wrote:
>>>
>>> In my package 'glmmML' I'm using old C code and linpack in the optimizing procedure. Specifically, one part of the code looks like this:
2011 Aug 14
1
Solving a equation
Hi there, I have following equations to be solved for a and b:
a/(a+b) = x1
ab/((a+b)^2 (a+b+1)) = x2
Is there any direct function available to solve them without
disentangling them manually? Thanks for your help.
2012 Mar 06
1
Scale parameter in Weibull distribution
Hi all,
I'm trying to generate a Weibull distribution including four covariates in
the model. Here is the code I used:
T = rweibull(200, shape=1.3,
scale=0.004*exp(-(-2.5*b1+2.5*b2+0.9*x1-1.3*x2)/1.3))
C = rweibull(n, shape=1.5, scale=0.008) #censoring time
time = pmin(T,C) #observed time is min of censored and true
event = time==T # set to 1 if event is observed