similar to: hypergeometric function in ‘ mvtnorm’

I have the code for the bivariate Gaussian copula. It is written with for-loops, it works, but I wonder if there is a way to vectorize the function. I don't see how outer() can be used in this case, but maybe one can use mapply() or Vectorize() in some way? Could anyone help me, please? ## Density of Gauss Copula rho <- 0.5 #corr R <- rbind(c(1,rho),c(rho,1)) #vcov matrix id <-

Announcement: mvtnorm Multivariate Normal and T Distribution mvtnorm implements two R functions for the computation of the multivariate t and normal distribution: pmvt: Computes the the distribution function of the multivariate t distribution for arbitary limits, degrees of freedom and correlation matrices based on algorithms by Genz and Bretz. pmvnorm: Computes the distribution

Announcement: mvtnorm Multivariate Normal and T Distribution mvtnorm implements two R functions for the computation of the multivariate t and normal distribution: pmvt: Computes the the distribution function of the multivariate t distribution for arbitary limits, degrees of freedom and correlation matrices based on algorithms by Genz and Bretz. pmvnorm: Computes the distribution

Hi, all: Two examples are shown below. I want to use the multiple comparison of Dunnett. It succeeded in upper case "example 1". However, the lower case "example 2" went wrong. In "example 2", the function pmvt return NaN, so I cannot show this simtest result. Is there any solution? (I changed the variable "maxpts" to a large number in front of the

Hello there! My operating system is Windows XP, my version of R is the latest (R-2.5.0). Recently I have downloaded the package "mvtnorm" and a problem with the command "pmvnorm" occured. Trying to enter the lines ... A <- diag(3) A[1,2] <-0.5 A[1,3] <- 0.25 A[2,3] <- 0.5 pvmnorm(lower=c(-Inf,-Inf,-Inf), upper=c(2,2,2),mean = c(0,0,0), corr=A) I got the following

Hi, I am looking for an efficient way to compute the values of the density function of a multivariate T distribution - something like "dmvnorm", but for T distr. Does this exist somewhere? Many thanks, Jan Bulla Goettingen University

Hi, Thank you for the tip. I tried to re-intall R from Debian "stable", in which R's version is 1.4.0. And the installation of "mvtnorm" works. I then re-installed R yet again from Debian "unstable" (woody), in which R's version is 1.5.1. The installation of "mvtnorm" fails again with the same error message. Another package that failed with the

Dear R Users, There exists a non-central hypergeometric distribution function in the (MCMCpack) package, and a hypergeometric distribution function in the (stats) package. Is there a function for sampling from an extended hypergeometric distribution? Thanks, Narcyz This message is intended for the addressee named and may con...{{dropped}}

Hi, I hope somebody can help me on how to use the hypergeometric function. I did read through the R documentation on hypergeometric but not really sure what it means. I would like to evaluate the hypergeometric function as follows: F((2*alpha+1)/2, (2*alpha+2)/2 , alpha+1/2, betasq/etasq). I'm not sure which function should be used- either phyper or qhyper or dhyper Where

For those who are interested, I have made available a R function for noncentral hypergeometric distribution at http://www.geocities.com/jg_liao/software/Hypergeometric/hypergeometric_in_R.txt The paper that describes the algorithm will appear in The American Statistician. The function does not run on S-plus as the R's scoping rule is used. Here is how the function can be used: > n1

Hello. Somebody knows how to compute generalized hypergeometric series in R? (see http://functions.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunctions/HypergeometricPFQ/02/ to understand what I mean) Thanks in advance, Arnau.

Dear All, I am looking for an implementation in R of the Appell Hypergeometric function. Any suggestions will be more than appreciated! GP -- dr. Giovanni Parrinello External Lecturer Medical Statistics Unit Department of Biomedical Sciences Viale Europa, 11 - 25123 Brescia Italy Tel: +390303717528 Fax: +390303717488 email: parrinel at med.unibs.it

I have been reading, in various sources, that a poisson distribution is related to binomial, extending the idea to include numbers of events in a given period of time. In my case, the hypergeometric distribution seems more appropriate, but I need a temporal dimension to the distribution. I have weekly samples of two kinds of events: call them A and B. I have a count of A events. These change

I'd like to fit the (1-displaced) negative hypergeometric distribution to data samples such as the following:- x <- c(370, 311, 299, 266, 265, 232, 197, 198, 170, 154, 133, 123, 120, 103, 80, 72, 69, 67, 67, 50, 36, 35, 26, 23, 15, 11, 9, 6, 5, 3, 3, 2, 2, 2) i.e., I want to estimate the parameter values of K and M (with my data, n would usually be the same as the length of the data

A cut and paste typo has crept in and is rendering all values returned for the hypergeometric distribution incorrect. The problem is in src/main/arithmetic.c in the function "math4". The lines PROTECT(sy = allocVector(REALSXP, n)); a = REAL(sa); b = REAL(sb); c = REAL(sc); d = REAL(sc); /* <-- change this line */ y = REAL(sy); should

Dear R team, I have a simple question. I tried this command: phyper(17,449,19551,181, FALSE) [1] 1.47295e-07 and then I tried this command: (fisher.test(matrix(c(17,449,181,19551),2,2), alternative='greater'))$p.value [1] 3.693347e-06 Shouldn't be identical the results of the two commands ? What is the difference ? Thx a lot -- View this message in context:

Dear R Users, I employed the phyper() function to estimate the likelihood that the number of genes overlapping between 2 different lists of genes is due to chance. This appears to work appropriately. Now i want to try this with 3 lists of genes which phyper() does not appear to support. Some googling suggests i can utilize the Multivariate hypergeometric distribution to achieve this. eg.:

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

Dear list, I have performed several tests for the hypergeometric distribution using phyper() for some gene annotation categories as follows >phyper(26,830,31042,337, lower.tail=F) >phyper(16,387,31042,337, lower.tail=F) . . . I am only running some selected categories but I would like to correct this value for multiple testing since I have 3121 possible tests according to 3121

In both versions of R to which I currently have access (R-0.16.1 and R-0.61.1), "phyper" stops returning correct cumulative probabilities as the parameters of the hypergeometric distribution get large. For example, when N1=1345, N2=1055, and n=1330, phyper returns either 0 or 1, and nothing in between. Looking at phyper.c, it's clear what's happening. First a term (called