similar to: erasing "[1]"

Hi all; I want to print system.time whenever I execute any command. It takes too much time to type "system.time()" function to all command. is there any solution on it? And, apply(matrix,1,cumsum) command is too slow to some large matrix. is there any function like rowCumSums ? thank u! -- View this message in context:

hi all, What I want to do is show a number with thousand expression. I dont know exactly the expression name but here is example. 1,000 10,000,000 is there a way to express a number like that? -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/How-to-define-format-of-number-tp4555778p4555778.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

hi, i'm really in trouble to simulate some experiment. that is, it takes too much time to process the following code. following is short example, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- p<-data.frame(a=rnorm(10),b=rnorm(10),c=rnorm(10),d=rnorm(10)) test<-data.frame(a=rnorm(1),b=rnorm(1),c=rnorm(1),d=rnorm(1))

Folks I've encountered situations where I want to reuse a hard-drive. I do not want to preserve anything on the drive, and I'm not concerned about 'securely erasing' old content. I just want to be able to define it as an Physical Volume (in a logical volume set), or make it a ZFS disk, or sometimes make it a simple EXT3, ExFAT or NTFS disk. However, old

I'm updating some (very) old code, and one particular option of its plot method depends on a once-was-true trick polygon(x, y, border=TRUE, col=0) polygon(x, y, border=TRUE, density=0) would draw the polygon AND erase whatever was underneath it back to background color. Is there a reliable way to do this with the current R (standard graphics)? Terry Therneau PS For the

hi, I use R - 2.15(32bit), and want to make a code to clear a console. Actually, I used to run following code to do that but after update the version of R from 2.14 to 2.15, it doesn't work. cls <- function (t) { require(RDCOMClient) wsh <- COMCreate("Wscript.Shell") wsh$SendKeys("\f") invisible(wsh) } cls() or cls <-

> On 2014-Jul-15, at 08:29, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > Sounds pretty clearly buggy, and against the original design of the > ADT (as pointed out by the documentation quotation). When was erase > functionality added to MapVector? Can/should it be removed (and the > use case changed to use some other container) > > Making erase linear time

Hi all; Now I'm developing web application by using rapache in ubuntu. My problem is that as users execute the application, the server PC cumulates memory. After users close or refresh the application page, the server PC memory is still cumulated. Now I'm renewing apache machine by manually in terminal. Is there any way to kill memory when users refresh or close the application page?

On May 23, 2008, at 4:10 AM, Nicolas Capens wrote: > Hi all, > > I updated from 2.2 to the latest SVN head and I now get a debug > assert in BranchFolder::RemoveBlocksWithHash: “vector iterators > incompatible”. I’m using Visual C++ 2005. I think this is the > culprit code: > > MergePotentials.erase(CurMPIter); > if (CurMPIter==B) > break; >

I want to erase packets (rpm -e), but rpm say: multiple packages How to erase this packages? -- -- Devel in Precio http://www.pas-world.com

hi I'm making some program and it need to be hidden. it's not commercial purpose but it is educational, so i do want to hide the code of function. for example, if i made following function: a<-function(x){ y<-x^2 print(y) } i do not want someone to type "a" and take the code of the function. is there anyone who can help me? -- View this message in context:

Hi all, I updated from 2.2 to the latest SVN head and I now get a debug assert in BranchFolder::RemoveBlocksWithHash: "vector iterators incompatible". I'm using Visual C++ 2005. I think this is the culprit code: MergePotentials.erase(CurMPIter); if (CurMPIter==B) break; The erase clears the _Mycont field (i.e. the iterator's container), while the ==

> On 2014-Jul-15, at 09:38, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith > <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2014-Jul-15, at 08:29, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Sounds pretty clearly buggy, and against the original design of the

# polygon ignores requests to have its border transparent, look at par(bg="transparent") plot(c(0, 3), 0:1) polygon(c(0, 1, 1, 0), c(0, 0, 1, 1), border=NA, col = 0) polygon(c(1, 2, 2, 1), c(0, 0, 1, 1), border="transparent", col = 0) polygon(c(2, 3, 3, 2), c(0, 0, 1, 1), border=0, col = 0) # a quick fix for erase.screen() is the following erase.screen <- function (n =

I have a case where the easiest way to draw a particular symbol would be to draw something a little bigger, and then use polygon(... , col=0) to erase the extra stuff. Just how to do this best when par('bg') = 'transparent' is, however, eluding me. I've looked through the archives and the book R Graphics without quite seeing the light. Help or pointers to help would be

Hello! Don't quite understand how can I delete grobs and simultaneously erase graphic output they produce. I first change grob's "vp" field to null (grid.edit(gr,vp=NULL)) to erase it and then call rm(gr) (as grobs are external pointers I'm not shure what this method actually frees allocated memory). May be there is simpler method? Does garbage collector have any effect

Hello! Don't quite understand how can I delete grobs and simultaneously erase graphic output they produce. I first change grob's "vp" field to null (grid.edit(gr,vp=NULL)) to erase it and then call rm(gr) (as grobs are external pointers I'm not shure what this method actually frees allocated memory). May be there is simpler method? Does garbage collector have any effect

At Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:14:44 -0700 CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> wrote: > > Folks > > I've encountered situations where I want to reuse a hard-drive. I do > not want to preserve anything on the drive, and I'm not concerned > about 'securely erasing' old content. I just want to be able to > define it as an Physical Volume (in a logical

what if you just dd the first 1GB of the disk and the last GB of the disk (the last because of RAID signatures of some controllers that write to the end of the disk) Look at this article and modify accordingly https://zedt.eu/tech/linux/using-dd-to-repeatedly-erase-a-specific-range-of-sectors-on-the-hard-disk/ Also, use wipefs -a (Gordon Messmer answered faster than me) On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at

> On 2014-Jul-15, at 10:05, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith > <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2014-Jul-15, at 09:38, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith >>>