similar to: [ANNOUNCE] Samba 3.5.13 Available for Download

=================================================================== "Originality is the fine art of remembering what you hear but forgetting where you heard it." Laurence J. Peter ================================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the latest stable release of Samba 3.6. Major enhancements in Samba

=================================================================== "Originality is the fine art of remembering what you hear but forgetting where you heard it." Laurence J. Peter ================================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the latest stable release of Samba 3.6. Major enhancements in Samba

Hi all; We have Squid 2.5.STABLE7running with 30 ntlm_auth helpers Version 3.0.10-1.fc3. The problem is that on the squid?s cachemgr.cgi->NTLM User Authenticator Stats is possible to verify that the ntlm_auth processes are slowly having the flag R (Reserved or Deferred) set and never being used again (the number of requests stops). This problem goes until there is no more ntlm_auth

libXpm is the library for handling images in the XPM format. Lest we be accused that users have to wait many years to get fixes out, let's quickly release the branch before the calendar turns over over again so it's just some years. The actual fixes here are some found by static analysers, and a build fix for Windows (which, curiously, is dated to 2012 so clearly we're at the top of

Full_Name: Masafumi OKADA Version: 2.0.1 OS: Windows Submission from: (NULL) (130.158.158.65) In the list of CRAN mirrors($R_HOME/doc/CRAN_mirrors.csv), I found a mistyping. Mirror in University of Tsukuba is described as "Tsukaba", not "Tsukuba". I know "Tsukuba" is correct, because I'm webmaster of this mirror :-) Current: "Japan

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:13:12AM +0100, Matteo Maretto wrote: > Hi, > we are migrating our fileserver from an old novell netware system to > a samba4 system. With netware all ACL were stored in a database, so > that it was possible to quickly find which files one user or group > had access to. > I'm investigating the possibility of writing ntfs ACL on a database > with

Il 19/03/2016 10:20, Volker Lendecke ha scritto: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 10:08:42AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:13:12AM +0100, Matteo Maretto wrote: >>> Hi, >>> we are migrating our fileserver from an old novell netware system to >>> a samba4 system. With netware all ACL were stored in a database, so >>> that it was

Hi, I'm hoping somebody can point me in the right direction. My samba version is samba-4.2.10-6.2.el7_2.x86_64. I have lots of daily core dumps (~20 on each machine daily) and I have no clear idea why. I'm including the stack trace below. It looks like the problem is related to "invalid lock_order". Any ideas? Thanks, Sergei #0 0x00007fc5a34945f7 in raise () from

Hi, we are migrating our fileserver from an old novell netware system to a samba4 system. With netware all ACL were stored in a database, so that it was possible to quickly find which files one user or group had access to. I'm investigating the possibility of writing ntfs ACL on a database with samba. The module vfs_acl_tdb is able to do this, but values are hashed so that the db is not

On Fri, 6 Jan 2017 22:28:11 -0600 Sergei Gerasenko via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm hoping somebody can point me in the right direction. My samba > version is samba-4.2.10-6.2.el7_2.x86_64. I have lots of daily core > dumps (~20 on each machine daily) and I have no clear idea why. I'm > including the stack trace below. It looks like the

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 10:08:42AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:13:12AM +0100, Matteo Maretto wrote: > > Hi, > > we are migrating our fileserver from an old novell netware system to > > a samba4 system. With netware all ACL were stored in a database, so > > that it was possible to quickly find which files one user or group > > had

Hi volks, i want to ask if the "fs_acl_xattr" and "vfs_acl_tdb" in samba 3.3 are now "stable" or if its planned to be stable in 3.4 What is the experience with this vfs modules in 3.3 ? Bye, Andy

Apologies in advance, but I have been banging my head against this and the only Google results I've found are from 2014, and don't work (or apply). OS: Ubuntu 18.04 bionic smbd: 4.9.4-Debian (the apt.van-belle.nl version) When I run `testparm` I get: rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (8192) to minimum Windows limit (16384) WARNING: The "syslog" option is deprecated

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:44:05PM +0200, Ralph Böhme wrote: > > Cheerio! > -slow Still reviewing this - but a few things that will need changing: When adding the validate_nt_acl_blob() function in [PATCH 06/12] vfs_acl_common: move the ACL blob validation to a helper function this makes some of the existing function names in debug statements incorrect. Eg. validate_nt_acl_blob()

My organization is in the position of having to support full Windows ACLs on CIFS shares. We've been successfully utilizing Samba 3.5.10-125 and vfs_acl_tdb to accomplish that. However, the size of the resulting /var/lib/samba/state/file_ntacls.tdb[.unique-extension] file(s) has introduced some new problems for me to solve. In our environment, it seems on average each stored ACL causes

On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 12:46:12PM +0200, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote: > > ...and this one even has bug urls in all commit messages. Sorry for > forgetting this in the previous version. Juuuusttt *one* leetle change, sorry :-). I was following the changes to the talloc heirarchy in the code and realized that adding the following change made it much clearer (at least to me). diff --git

Full_Name: Adolfo Jiménez Pérez Version: 1.8.0 (2003-10-08) OS: Window'98 2ed Submission from: (NULL) (81.203.134.156) I've a crash when reading a specific file with the command: > read.table("file.dat") This file can be readed with the 1.1.1 version using the same command and R reads it correctly. The content file is this: ---->file beginning<---------

Hi, Recently I'm trying Samba over Ceph (kernel client) mount. I encounter error when I add permission to file/directory for an additional user from Windows Explorer. Since Ceph does not support posix ACL operation for now, I was thinking that vfs_acl_xattr/vfs_acl_tdb with option "ignore system acls = yes" can workaround this issue but fail. From the man page of vfs_acl_xattr:

On 30/10/2019 17:32, torch via samba wrote: > Is the ?important" vfs objects parameter documented in a man page anywhere? It appears in the man pages of several vfs modules, but never fully documented that I could find. Apparently it once was from a now dead link https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/old/Samba3-HOWTO/smb.conf.5.html#VFSOBJECTS

If you have bash-completion-extras (or the equivalent for your bistro) installed, you should be able to type ?man vfs? and hit tab completion to see your list of available vfs objects. > On Oct 30, 2019, at 11:38 AM, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 30/10/2019 17:32, torch via samba wrote: >> Is the ?important" vfs objects parameter