similar to: [patch] Threading support in ssh-agent

Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao@cn.fujitsu.com> --- v2: add optargs_bitmask check daemon/btrfs.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ generator/actions.ml | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ src/MAX_PROC_NR | 2 +- 3 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/daemon/btrfs.c b/daemon/btrfs.c index d4b3207..340b548 100644 ---

Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao@cn.fujitsu.com> --- daemon/btrfs.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ generator/actions.ml | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ src/MAX_PROC_NR | 2 +- 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/daemon/btrfs.c b/daemon/btrfs.c index d4b3207..be648bc 100644 --- a/daemon/btrfs.c +++ b/daemon/btrfs.c @@

On 07.05.2015 11:26, RockCui@zhaoxin.com wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I’m testing the new openstack kilo on ubuntu15.04 and hypervisor is xen4.5. > I can creat instance successfully , but live migration is always failed. Error report like this: > > 2015-05-07 10:47:22.135 1331 ERROR nova.virt.libvirt.driver [-] [instance: b1081b86-fdce-4fcc-82c4-51896de4418c] Live Migration

Hi everyone, I’m testing the new openstack kilo on ubuntu15.04 and hypervisor is xen4.5. I can creat instance successfully , but live migration is always failed. Error report like this: 2015-05-07 10:47:22.135 1331 ERROR nova.virt.libvirt.driver [-] [instance: b1081b86-fdce-4fcc-82c4-51896de4418c] Live Migration failure: this function is not supported by the connection driver:

I still get the "the discard operation is not supported" fstrim error when the LVs are set to "nopassdown" Seems that when I use ext4 the fstrim reports that it worked but the LVs Data% does not decrease after the fstrim. xfs just throws the error. I've also been looking at the output of lsblk -D # lsblk -D NAME DISC-ALN DISC-GRAN DISC-MAX DISC-ZERO xvdb

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 02:53:35AM -0400, Chen Hanxiao wrote: > + /* btrfs-progs will valid numtheads and choose the right one for us */ > + if ((optargs_bitmask & GUESTFS_BTRFS_IMAGE_NUMTHREADS_BITMASK) > + && numthreads) { > + snprintf (numthreads_s, sizeof numthreads_s, "%d", numthreads); > + ADD_ARG (argv, i, "-t"); > + ADD_ARG

I have created a pool on external storage with B114. Then I export this pool and import it on another system with B110.But this import will fail and show error: cannot import ''tpool'': pool is formatted using a newer ZFS version. Any big change in ZFS with B114 leads to this compatibility issue? Thanks Zhihui -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 03:48:02AM -0500, Chen Hanxiao wrote: > Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao@cn.fujitsu.com> > + if (compresslevel >= 0) { > + snprintf (compresslevel_s, sizeof compresslevel_s, "%d", compresslevel); > + ADD_ARG (argv, i, "-c"); > + ADD_ARG (argv, i, compresslevel_s); > + } Because compresslevel is an optional

Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao@cn.fujitsu.com> --- v3: remove optional paramter numthreads(-t) v2: add optargs_bitmask check daemon/btrfs.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ generator/actions.ml | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ src/MAX_PROC_NR | 2 +- 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/daemon/btrfs.c b/daemon/btrfs.c index

Hi, I am installing OpenStack on Red Hat 7.5. For Nova compute component, I choose libvirt and Xen. However, I am running into some problems. It seems libvirt is unable to communicate with Xen. Xen installation: I installed Xen410 using "Xen make easy" https://xen.crc.id.au/support/guides/install/. Here is a list of packages installed and verification that Xen is running. #

We've been using the runtimes build for a while now and we're very happy with it. However, with an increasing number of targets, it can be fairly slow and I have noticed that we now spend more time in CMake than in Ninja. There are various ways we could improve things like eliminating unnecessary checks. When running checks like check_c_compiler_flag, check_cxx_compiler_flag or

Hello together, well since I'm close to the despair with my problem I wanna describe it here and maybe anyone has a good idea. As the subject already told you I'm trying to connect from a MS-DOS Client to my Samba Server. I'm running a smbd 2.0.5a on a AMD K6-III machine which has two IBM 16.8 GB IDE drives and is connected to over a 3com 3c905b with 100Mb to a fullduplex hub. So far I

> On Sep 22, 2020, at 15:28, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > > From the "not largely affected" camp: > > - the churn doesn't feel that major for HAS_ and ... > - the uniformity feels nice > > and in general feels nice and in pursuit of the longer term goals here. > > -eric > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 11:58 AM Petr

I''ve just pushed vdiskadm import/export/convert to the 3.3 vdisk and vbox repos. You can now import a disk image from a block device or file to a vdisk, convert (in place) to a different type of vdisk and export from a vdisk to a block device or file. I''ve also pushed the full vhd support (sparse and fixed) and the ability to import a vmdk 1.1 optimized stream file. An

> On Sep 24, 2020, at 23:52, Petr Hosek <phosek at chromium.org> wrote: > > Using more interface libraries is definitely the right direction and a modern way to use CMake. I'm not sure if we can get to a single interface target since different runtimes have different requirements. I was assuming that we would have one interface target per dependency and use the existing CMake

This series adds new APIs to support btrfstune. Chen Hanxiao (2): New API: btrfs-image New API: btrfs_image_restore daemon/btrfs.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ generator/actions.ml | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ src/MAX_PROC_NR | 2 +- 3 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.1.0

Good morning! I compiled samba 4.10.8 from source in a slackware 14.2 machine and imported a samba classic domain from an ldap backend. Everything works flawlessly except for a couple of user who are getting their accounts locked out periodically. I'm trying to debug this problem so I modified the smb.conf file of the DC so that it looks like this # Global parameters [global] ??????? dns

Hi All I'm trying to setup my LVM thin pool to support discards so that the pool can reclaim space even if the underlying device doesn't support trim. It is my understanding that all thin pools should support trim even if the underlying device doesn't. (please correct me if I'm wrong here) I have one centos server that does support trim and everything is working correctly but any

I'm pasting below the output of the debug script you sent me some time ago. Other than this Samba has been compiled with standard options, just ./configure, following the wiki guide with the offered bootstrap file for ubuntu18.04. root at fileserver:~# smbd -b Paths: SBINDIR: /usr/local/samba/sbin BINDIR: /usr/local/samba/bin CONFIGFILE: /usr/local/samba/etc/smb.conf

Hi Alon, I confirmed with pkcs11-tool (from OpenSC) and I can confirm that pressing return when asked for the pin causes the login to stop (and not to try a empty pin). Can you confirm if a empty pin is actually a valid pin, and if not, can the patch be accepted? Once again, the problem is that from a user experience, *some/most* users would expect they can skip pkcs11 token authentication just