similar to: resume on error

Hello when my code executes I receive the message that were some warnings. I want to catch warning messages at run time so to print some local variables and try to understand why this warning happens. I searched on internet and I tried withCallingHandlers( which seems to work but as I used Rkward the result is awful. I get a prompt to copy paste a value only while at the same time my background

Dear list! I have a script that processes a large number of data files. When one file fails to process correctly, I want the script to write a message and to continue with the next file. I achieved this with tryCatch: for (f in files) tryCatch({heavy.lifting(f)}, error=function(e) log.error.to.file(e)) I also want to log warning messages and tried something like this: for (f in

On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 09:38:41AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:20 PM, Lukas Wunner <lukas at wunner.de> wrote: > > Okay, the PCI device is suspending and the nvkm_i2c_aux_acquire() > > wants it in resumed state, so is waiting forever for the device to > > runtime suspend in order to resume it again immediately afterwards. > > >

On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 10:36 +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:25:05AM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > The GPU contains an i2c subdevice for each connector with DDC lines. > > I believe those are modelled as children of the GPU's PCI device as > > they're accessed via mmio of the PCI device. > > > > The problem here is that when the

[1]Click here to unsubscribe if you no longer wish to receive our emails Hello, We have an excellent consultant, Pritesh Agrawal - SAP ABAP . Below is his/her quick profile for your review. Pritesh Agrawal - SAP ABAP - Rate: Open Total Exp: 9+ Available: immediate Relocation: OPEN Over 9.5 years of work experience in SAP R/3 technical, functional and

On 1 December 2010 09:46, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Nor these. Basically, I want the basic block that's labeled a "landing pad" to be jumped to by only a dispatch resume or unwind edge of invoke. We could do this with the c.dtor and ch.int here, but it would mean inserting useless "cleanup dispatches" that only resume to the block (see

On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 12:53:11PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > On Tue, 2018-07-17 at 09:16 +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 07:59:25PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > > > In order to fix all of the spots that need to have runtime PM get/puts() > > > added, we need to ensure that it's possible for us to call > > > pm_runtime_get/put() in any

On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 02:24:31PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > On Tue, 2018-07-17 at 20:20 +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > Okay, the PCI device is suspending and the nvkm_i2c_aux_acquire() > > wants it in resumed state, so is waiting forever for the device to > > runtime suspend in order to resume it again immediately afterwards. > > > > The deadlock in the stack

Dear all. I am using the mclapply function to split my code to the many cores my system has. It seems that is working fine. This is the parallel version of lcapply. The only problem that I seem to have is that the printf cannot print messages. The ideal to me is to have fro my function an output of the form Shadowlist<-mclapply(1:dimz, function(i) { print(sprintf('Creating the

Dear R-devel community, There appears to be an inconsistency in R C API about the exceptions that can be raised from C code. Mapping of R C funs to corresponding R functions is as follows. error -> stop warning -> warning REprintf -> message Rprintf -> cat Rprint/cat is of course not an exception, I listed it just for completeness. The inconsistency I would like to report is

This is a revision of the second exception handling proposal I sent out. You can see it here: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2010-November/036484.html After much discussion, there are some changes to the proposal – some significant and some minor. One major point, this proposal does not address the issue of catching an exception thrown from a non-invoke instruction. However if done

Could smb please help with try-catch encapsulating a function for downloading. Let's say I have a character vector of symbols and want to download each one and surround by try and catch to be safe # get.hist.quote() is in library(tseries), but the question does not depend on it, I could be sourcing local files instead ans=null;error=null; for ( sym in sym.vec){

On Dec 1, 2010, at 1:12 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 1 December 2010 07:04, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: >> The unwind edge from an invoke instruction jumps to a landing pad. That landing pad contains code which performs optional cleanups, and then determines which catch handler to call (if any). If no catch handlers are applicable, the exception resumes propagation

What? Yet another EH proposal?! This one is different from the others in that I'm planning to start implementing this shortly. But I want your feedback! I've all ready gotten a lot of feedback from Chris, John, Jim, Eric, and many others. Now is your turn! Please read this proposal and send me your comments, suggestions, and concerns. -bw

Thank you Luke for prompt reply. Is it possible then to request a new function to R C API "message" that would equivalent to R "message" function? Similarly as we now have C "warning" and C "error" functions. Best, Jan On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 5:25 PM Tierney, Luke <luke-tierney at uiowa.edu> wrote: > > On Sun, 15 Sep 2019, Jan Gorecki wrote:

Hi everyone! I've been silently working on the previous exception handling proposal I published last year (http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-November/027311.html). However, there were some major deficiencies in it. After discussing this further with Jim Grosbach and John McCall, we've come up with another proposal. As you can see, it incorporates the idea of

Hi Bill, this proposal seems strangely complicated. I don't see the advantage of the dispatch instruction over just attaching the information to each invoke. Right now you have invoke void @_Z3foov() to label %invcont unwind label %catch.handlers catch.handlers: landingpad dispatch resume to label %... catches [ %struct.__fundamental_type_info_pseudo* @_ZTIi, label

I would like to use the 'tryCatch' function but am having a hard time getting my head around it. In 'C' like languages try/catch/finally means try a block of statements and if any throw an error then do the statements in the catch block and then error or not always do the staements in the finally block. In 'R' as best as I can tell the block of staements in the try block is

After a long tale of sorrow and woe, my colleagues and I stand here before you defeated. The Itanium EH representation is not amenable to implementing MSVC-compatible exceptions. We need a new representation that preserves information about how try-catch blocks are nested. WinEH background ------------------------------- Skip this if you already know a lot about Windows exceptions. On Windows,

On 17.11.2013 00:22, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 04/10/13 01:54, Christoph Rudorff wrote: >> Am Donnerstag, den 03.10.2013, 23:50 +0100 schrieb Emil Velikov: >>> I'm not entirely sure this is correct. One needs to save and disable >>> accleration before suspending the fb. Please try the following >>> >>> - if (state == 0) >>> + if (state == 1)