similar to: How do I force confint() for glm() to be quiet?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "How do I force confint() for glm() to be quiet?"

2011 Aug 02
1
How to 'mute' a function (like confint())
Dear R-helpers, I am using confint() within a function, and I want to turn off the message it prints: x <- rnorm(100) y <- x^1.1+rnorm(100) nlsfit <- nls(y ~ g0*x^g1, start=list(g0=1,g1=1)) > confint(nlsfit) Waiting for profiling to be done... 2.5% 97.5% g0 0.4484198 1.143761 g1 1.0380479 2.370057 I cannot find any way to turn off 'Waiting for. .." I tried
2004 Jul 13
2
confint.glm in a function
I can't get confint.glm to work from within a function. Consider the following (using R 1.9.1, Windows 2000): # FIRST: SOMETHING THAT WORKS FROM A COMMAND PROMPT DF <- data.frame(y=.1, N=100) (fit <- glm(y~1, family=binomial, data=DF, weights=DF[,"N"])) Call: glm(formula = y ~ 1, family = binomial, data = DF, weights = DF[, "N"]) Coefficients:
2009 Dec 07
5
confint for glm (general linear model)
Hi, I have a glm gives summary as follows, Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) -2.03693352 1.449574526 -1.405194 0.159963578 A 0.01093048 0.006446256 1.695633 0.089955471 N 0.41060119 0.224860819 1.826024 0.067846690 S -0.20651005 0.067698863 -3.050421 0.002285206 then I use confint(k.glm)
2019 Apr 24
1
Bug in "stats4" package - "confint" method
Dear R developers, I noticed a bug in the stats4 package, specifically in the confint method applied to ?mle? objects. In particular, when some ?fixed? parameters define the log likelihood, these parameters are stored within the mle object but they are not used by the ?confint" method, which retrieves their value from the global environment (whenever they still exist). Sample code: >
2003 Nov 17
1
confint: which method attached?
the function confint uses the profiling method of the function of the package MASS confint.glm even after the package has been detached! 1: might this be the intenden behavior? 2. How does the function remember its 'MASS' functionality after detaching the package? R: 1.8.0; Windows 2000 Here is a sample program > set.seed(7882) > x<-rep(c(0,1),c(20,20)) >
2018 Jul 20
3
Should there be a confint.mlm ?
It seems that confint.default returns an empty data.frame for objects of class mlm. For example: ``` nobs <- 20 set.seed(1234) # some fake data datf <- data.frame(x1=rnorm(nobs),x2=runif(nobs),y1=rnorm(nobs),y2=rnorm(nobs)) fitm <- lm(cbind(y1,y2) ~ x1 + x2,data=datf) confint(fitm) # returns: 2.5 % 97.5 % ``` I have seen proposed workarounds on stackoverflow and elsewhere, but
2007 Dec 05
1
confint for coefficients from lm model (PR#10496)
Full_Name: Christian Lajaunie Version: 2.5.1 OS: Fedora fc6 Submission from: (NULL) (193.251.63.39) confint() does not use the appropriate variance term when the design matrix contains a zero column (which of course should not happen). Example: A 10x2 matrix with trivial column 1: > junk <- data.frame(x=rep(0,10), u=factor(sample(c("Y", "N"), 10, replace=T))) The
2000 Jul 21
1
confint() error
Dear all, I have run the confint() function according to below and I get the following error message: > confint(stepAIC.glm.spe.var.konn2.abund, level=0.95) Waiting for profiling to be done... Error: missing value where logical needed In addition: Warning message: NaNs produced in: sqrt((fm$deviance - OriginalDeviance)/DispersionParameter) or > confint(stepAIC.glm.spe.var.konn2.abund,
2009 Oct 02
1
confint fails in quasibinomial glm: dims do not match
I am unable to calculate confidence intervals for the slope estimate in a quasibinomial glm using confint(). Below is the output and the package info for MASS. Thanks in advance! R 2.9.2 MASS 7.2-48 > confint(glm.palive.0.str) Waiting for profiling to be done... Error: dims [product 37] do not match the length of object [74] > glm.palive.0.str Call: glm(formula = cbind(alive, red) ~ str,
2006 Jan 08
1
confint/nls
I have found some "issues" (bugs?) with nls confidence intervals ... some with the relatively new "port" algorithm, others more general (but possibly in the "well, don't do that" category). I have corresponded some with Prof. Ripley about them, but I thought I would just report how far I've gotten in case anyone else has thoughts. (I'm finding the code
2011 Oct 14
1
pgfSweave-example not compiling
I'm trying to get pgfSweave up and running. Hopefully I can get it working from within LyX, but first I'm just trying to get the simplest possible thing (compiling one of the example files in the pgfSweave package) to work. I'm using the example that comes in the pgfSweave package unmodified, but for reference I copied it to: http://pastebin.com/tW4RL6fs Configuration: R version
2012 Jan 18
4
confint function in MASS package for logistic regression analysis
I have the following binary data set: Sex Response 0 1 0 159 162 1 4 37 My commands library(MASS) sib.glm=glm(sib~sex,family=binomial,data=sib.data) summary(sib.glm) The coefficients in the output are Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) -3.6826 0.5062 -7.274 3.48e-13
2005 Dec 22
3
Windows crash in confint() with nls fit (PR#8428)
Full_Name: Ben Bolker Version: 2.2.1 OS: Windows XP and 2000 Submission from: (NULL) (128.227.60.124) The following code, using confint() to try to get confidence intervals on an nls object that has been fitted with algorithm="port" reliably crashes R 2.2.0 and 2.2.1 with the latest version of MASS on a Windows 2000 and a Windows XP machine here. I *think* earlier versions of MASS
2006 Dec 13
1
Curious finding in MASS:::confint.glm() tied to eval()
Greetings all, I was in the process of creating a function to generate profile likelihood confidence intervals for a proportion using a binomial glm. This is a component of a larger function to generate and plot confidence intervals for proportions using the above, along with bootstrap (BCa), Wilson and Exact to visually demonstrate the variation across the methods to some folks. I had initially
2007 Jan 05
1
Calling "confint.glm" from within another function
On July 12, 2004 Spencer Graves wrote an email describing essentially the same issue that I would like help on: calling the confint function from within another homemade function. Because he provided many good examples of the problem, I will not reproduce them here but will instead refer readers to the original posting: http://www.mail-archive.com/r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch/msg23826.html It is
2008 Sep 16
1
One helps with the command "confint"
Dear colleagues, I have used statistical software "R" in academic research, and I find very interesting. So now I have started my studies at advanced level. I have conducted several statistical models of the type "*nls*". In respect of procedures for models of the type nls, I'd like you answer only one question that I have had doubts, related to the formula
2008 Oct 30
1
continue a loop after an error with confint
Hi all, I've got a list (Reg3Lst) with 1000 nls regression results in it. I'd like to get the confidence interval of the parameters obtained with the nonlinear regressions. Thus I've used this: for (i in 1:1000) { foo<-list(foo,confint(Reg3Lst[[i]])) } For some regressions the confidence interval is not estimated because of a singular gradient result. Then it
2010 Feb 11
1
Sweve/cacheSweave
Hi there I have a problem with using Sweave in combination with the option driver = cacheSweave. Whichever code I try to run - when it comes to converting the tex file into pdf it comes up with the same errors (\csname \endcsname errors). Does anybody have an idea what it going wrong? > Sweave("pgfSweave-example.Rnw",driver = cacheSweaveDriver) Writing to file
2006 May 03
1
Problem in using confint method on polr model object
I fit a proportional odds model with the polr-function of the MASS package from Venables and Ripley Applying the confint method to calculate confidence intervals for the parameters I get the following error message Waiting for profiling to be done... Re-fitting to get Hessian Error in X[, -i, drop = FALSE] : incorrect number of dimensions Can someone explain the error-message? (The
2011 Feb 11
2
Problem with confint function
Hi, I am currently doing logistic regression analyses and I am trying to get confidence intervals for my partial logistic regression coefficients. Supposing I am right in assuming that the formula to estimate a 95% CI for a log odds coefficient is the following: log odds - 1.96*SE to log odds + 1.96*SE then I am not getting the right CI. For instance, this is a summary of my model: