similar to: Mozilla NSS branch merge

Hello all, In order to prepare the merge of the NSS branch to the trunk, I have validated the code in this branch by passing this validation document written by Emilien Kia : http://www.networkupstools.org/tmp/NUT-NSS_Mini_DVT_Plan-final.pdf The testing has been done on rev 3685 of the ssl-nss-port branch. As you can read, I have found no issue. Let me know if you have any comments on this.

Dear fellows, As you have probably seen, NUT has had a recent boost through the help of Eaton. Frederic Bohe (contractor for Eaton France) has worked on Augeas, and is now working the Windows port. Chetan Agarwal, seconded by Prashi Gandi (both from Eaton India) are working on XCP and quality / validation related projects. I'm now pleased to announce that Emilien Kia (contractor for Eaton

Dear NUT developers and contributors, time has come to shed more light on 2.8.0 roadmap! Ubuntu Developer Summit attendance has helped to clarify things. several of 2.8.0 tasks are detailed here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerOneiricInfraPower I'm conscious that our development infrastructure (Alioth) is not that suitable to track roadmaps, "Agile" specs and developments, as we do

Hello, As you may have noticed, a first running version of nut for Windows has been released some time ago. In order to validate the possibility to merge the windows_port branch to the trunk, I have produced a patch file using the "svn diff" command. This patch couldn't be applied directly and the use of a merging tool is still needed. It is only intended to be reviewed so that we

Hi all, I am pleased to announce that NSS port of NUT is finished. Port is fully functionnal (same functionnalities as openssl, and a not-activated-by-default client certificate validation function) and successfully tested by myself (external tests are pending, Frederic Bohe is planned for) with a test matrix which will be uploaded to the web site soon (by Arnaud), tested functionnality by

I am planning to purchase one of the following Eaton UPS units: 5PX3000RTN http://powerquality.eaton.com/5PX3000RTN.aspx?CX=3 PW9130L3000R-XL2UN http://powerquality.eaton.com/PW9130L3000R-XL2UN.aspx?CX=3 Both of which bundle the NETWORK-MS card: http://powerquality.eaton.com/Products-services/Power-Management/Connectivity/Network-MS.asp Can anyone speak to either UPS units' compatibility

2012/10/12 Emilien Kia <kiae.dev at gmail.com> > Hi guys, > Hi Emilien and the list, This is a pull request to finally merge NSS feature in nut trunk: > https://github.com/clepple/nut/pull/3 > I'd like to take a moment to shed some more light on this important development, which lasted 3 years: - the initial

2011/6/27 Frederic BOHE <fbohe-guest at alioth.debian.org> > Author: fbohe-guest > Date: Mon Jun 27 13:56:51 2011 > New Revision: 3060 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/3060 > > Log: > Add NUT server scan. > > (...) > device_t * scan_snmp(char * start_ip, char * stop_ip,long usec_timeout, > snmp_security_t * sec); > >

Hi, I'll be retaining a bit more 2.6.4, since I'm still missing some feedback and checks to maximize confidence... > The remainder on my side is: > - some completion on HP SNMP, > - merge branch-var-range > - merge LiebertPSP-2012-05-09.diff from Charles > - a massive update on blazer HCL, all this is done > - shut switch (mge-shut->mge-shut-old ;

2010/2/17 Arnaud Quette > 2010/2/17 Arjen de Korte: > > Citeren Charles Lepple: > > > >> I wonder if there are any cross-compilation targets we could use to test > >> some of the word-size assumptions. Also, we could add in some static > >> analysis tools. > > FYI, I submitted NUT to the Coverity Scan program > (http://scan.coverity.com) last

If you don't use 'CERTVERIFY 1', then this will at least make sure that nobody can sniff your sessions without a large effort (...) > So, do I misunderstand CERTVERIFY directive ? Or is there a bug ? >> Can you reproduce such behaviour ? >> > > I'm not sure what is going on. Can you try running 'upsmon' with debugging > enabled? The following are

On Dec 1, 2018, at 3:45 PM, raul <raulvior.bcn at gmail.com> wrote: > > The UPS is connected to the following environment: > OS: Debian GNU/Linux 9.6 (stretch) > NUT version: 2.7.4-5 > Device output from lsusb: 0463:ffff MGE UPS Systems UPS > Model name: MGE EllipseMAX 1500 > URLs: >

Hi. I'm using ubuntu 10.04 and I'm in the process of buying a ups. This is it (eaton 5115 ups) with usb interface http://powerquality.eaton.com/05146561-5591.aspx?CX=3 I had a look at the ups compatibility chart here: http://www.networkupstools.org/stable-hcl.html But I can't find this particular ups listed. I plan to use NUT v. 2.4.3 that I can get from the

The UPS is connected to the following environment: OS: Debian GNU/Linux 9.6 (stretch) NUT version: 2.7.4-5 Device output from lsusb: 0463:ffff MGE UPS Systems UPS Model name: MGE EllipseMAX 1500 URLs: http://powerquality.eaton.com/Products-services/Backup-Power-UPS/Ellipse-MAX-eol.aspx?cx=97&GUID=7BB6CD53-9F6D-4D62-B326-1099F137BF8D http://powerquality.eaton.com/68558.aspx?cx=97 The problem

Device Manufacturer: Eaton Device Name: 5S1500LCD ---------------------------------------------------------- upsc output: battery.charge: 100 battery.charge.low: 20 battery.runtime: 3515 battery.type: PbAc device.mfr: EATON device.model: Ellipse PRO 1500 device.serial: 0000000000 device.type: ups driver.name: usbhid-ups driver.parameter.pollfreq: 30 driver.parameter.pollinterval: 2

Device Manufacturer: Eaton Device Name: 5S1500LCD ---------------------------------------------------------- upsc output: battery.charge: 100 battery.charge.low: 20 battery.runtime: 3515 battery.type: PbAc device.mfr: EATON device.model: Ellipse PRO 1500 device.serial: 0000000000 device.type: ups driver.name: usbhid-ups driver.parameter.pollfreq: 30 driver.parameter.pollinterval: 2

Hey, I'm scheduling a 2.6.2 release for max. September 15. The content will be lighter than first expected with 2.8.0 (see below). This includes the current trunk plus: - merge the nut-scanner branch, - some snmp-ups improvements (sysOID matching for init stage) and some more MIBs, - a first complete version of the nut-ipmipsu driver, - the new jNut Java binding, - preliminary support of

On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 03:46 +0000, Charles Lepple wrote: > Author: clepple-guest > Date: Fri Dec 9 03:46:11 2011 > New Revision: 3344 > URL: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/3344 > > Log: > Force files to be overwritten (especially for libtool) > > Modified: > branches/nut-scanner_dlopen/autogen.sh > > Modified:

Dear NUT users, Thanks to Fred Boh? work, we now have a complete NUT port on Windows, sponsored by Eaton. We hereby release a first Beta package (2.6.0-1), following a light tests plan on our side, and would welcome as much feedback as possible. So, if you can take 5-10 mn to install and test this MSI package on your Windows system(s), the link is there:

On Jul 17, 2013, at 11:27 AM, Matt Ivie wrote: > I'm really just looking for a UPS that might run a couple of small > servers and other small devices(routers or switches). Good call on including the network gear in the power budget. NUT isn't much use to the slave systems if the network connection between master and slave goes down. > If I could get > 15-30 minutes of