similar to: Whether the THREAD command support cross-mailbox thread?

Hello, we are developing a library to show last arrived messages of all threads in a folder with more than 300k messages. As per the RFC 5256, the IMAP thread command has only the option to specify the grouping criteria (REFERENCES vs ORDEREDSUBJECT). So we implemented an algorithm which gets the full UID SORT ordered by date in reverse order then gets all thread relations and then post

Hi all, I have a question on the package « survey” I have some difficulties to use the function ‘calibrate’. Although it works well with one single factor variable, I cannot use it for 2 and get the message “Erreur dans regcalibrate.survey.design2(design, formula, population, aggregate.stage = aggregate.stage, : Population and sample totals are not the same length.” Here is the format

Hello, I am currently attempting to introduce R at my company and am trying to import time series data from a text file into R to graph. The format of the text file is in date, data (e.g., 20040929 3.361). My problem is that I do not know how to get R to recognize the first column as a business date series. Or at the very least, I am unable to find a function that will grap the second column

Hello, I am wondering if someone can direct me to the syntax of the Generalised Additive Model in R? In Splus this is gam(formula, ... inputs would be pretty much the same as glm I suspect..) Any response on that (or what package should I grap) would be appreciated very much. Thanks, Peppy Adi-Purnomo -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help

On Nov 21, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: > Chris Lattner writes: >> I'm still really interested in making Clang (and thus LLVM) faster at -O0 (while still preserving debuggability of course). > > Why? I want the compiler to build things quickly in all modes, but -O0 in particular is important for a fast compile/debug/edit cycle. Are you asking why fast compilers

Chris Lattner writes: > On Nov 21, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: > >> Chris Lattner writes: >>> I'm still really interested in making Clang (and thus LLVM) faster >>> at -O0 (while still preserving debuggability of course). >> >> Why? > > I want the compiler to build things quickly in all modes, but -O0 in > particular is

Hi, Though this has no direct relation with Asterisk, I think Asterisk users in Contact Centers might have an interesting answer. Using Gmail, it's rather easy to label an incoming email so that any related email (reply) inherits this label and are commonly displayed together in threads. Using Google, I found this related RFC5256 ( http://tools.ietf.org/search/rfc5256). Which (preferably

/etc/dovecot/virtual/Inbox2/dovecot-virtual * -Trash -Trash/* -Deleted* -Junk* inthread x-references2 x-mailbox INBOX Using php to connect o {host}virtual/Inbox2 gives me [SERVERBUG] BUG: Unknown internal error. If I connect to virtual/Allmail which has "all" instead of the inthread line it works.

Webmail.us will be sponsoring my Dovecot development for this summer. Other companies are also welcome to participate in the costs. Participation gets you: - listed in Credits in www.dovecot.org - listed in AUTHORS file - you can tell me how you want to use the feature and I'll make sure that it supports it (within reasonable limits) For already implemented v1.1 features, see

How should I install windows applications on clients joining a samba PDC? THX Davide Parise E-Mail: d.parise@agora.it

Hi all, Long story short, I'd like to configure a folder containing: INBOX (some other folders) -> unseen emails from these folders + all other emails (also seen) from the same thread -> seen emails from these folders, but only the recent ones + all other emails from the same thread I tried: # inthread refs (or (or recent unseen) recent ) inthread refs unseen # inthread

This is the error I receive when attempting to start the service. This is from /var/log/messages. Mar 27 11:41:17 portero smb: smbd startup succeeded Mar 27 11:41:17 portero smb: nmbd startup failed Mar 27 11:41:18 portero srvsvcd: execvp: No such file or directory Mar 27 11:41:18 portero smb: srvsvcd startup failed Mar 27 11:41:18 portero wkssvcd: execvp: No such file or directory Mar 27

Been experimenting with virtual mailbox and have a question :- I have defined 2 virtual mailboxes 'all' and 'combined' as follows ... virtual/all/dovecot-virtual virtual/combined inthread refs x-mailbox INBOX virtual/combined/dovecot-virtual !INBOX INBOX/Sent INBOX/Drafts all When new mail comes I would assume that both virtual mailboxes should actually see the message

Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt at gulbrandsen.priv.no> writes: >>>> I'm still really interested in making Clang (and thus LLVM) faster >>>> at -O0 (while still preserving debuggability of course). >>> >>> Why? >> >> I want the compiler to build things quickly in all modes, but -O0 in >> particular is important for a fast

I've been doing a fair amount of work with Vorbis support for Ambisonics, which seems to be going along nicely. It seems that there is signifant interest in coding 5.1 material with Vorbis esp as tarkin becomes more complete, so I've decided to take a break from pure ambisonic work to look into this. I've decided that the best (from a pure elegance and patent avoidance) way to handle

I've been doing a fair amount of work with Vorbis support for Ambisonics, which seems to be going along nicely. It seems that there is signifant interest in coding 5.1 material with Vorbis esp as tarkin becomes more complete, so I've decided to take a break from pure ambisonic work to look into this. I've decided that the best (from a pure elegance and patent avoidance) way to handle

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/alpha/dovecot-1.2.alpha1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/alpha/dovecot-1.2.alpha1.tar.gz.sig This is the only v1.2.alpha announcement I'm going to send to dovecot-news list. Next announcement will be for either v1.2.beta1 or v1.2.rc1. I'm hoping that v1.2 stabilizes pretty soon. There are no huge changes like there were in 0.99->1.0 or

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/alpha/dovecot-1.2.alpha1.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/alpha/dovecot-1.2.alpha1.tar.gz.sig This is the only v1.2.alpha announcement I'm going to send to dovecot-news list. Next announcement will be for either v1.2.beta1 or v1.2.rc1. I'm hoping that v1.2 stabilizes pretty soon. There are no huge changes like there were in 0.99->1.0 or

Hello, Timo: on Oct 29th I wrote ---- with latest 2.0.6 (601065674f74), the following virtual mailbox is not behaving correctly. I'm quite sure that the problem has not existed in some earlier 2.0.x (maybe only INBOX as mailbox then though): ~user/Maildir/virtual/.week/dovecot-virtual contains INBOX INBOX.* -INBOX.Trash inthread refs younger 604800 This works as expected for the first

I merged all the new features and latest v1.1 changes under one tree: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/ The changeset order is kind of weird though. The timestamps jump all around. Wonder if there's a way to reorder them so that it looks more sane.. The status of the new features: 1. CONDSTORE extension is probably the largest change. It adds new "modification sequences" for