similar to: Reshape question

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 120 matches similar to: "Reshape question"

2007 Mar 22
3
Cohen's Kappa
Hi, im little bit confused about Cohen's Kappa and i should be look into the Kappa function code. Is the easy formula really wrong? kappa=agreement-chance/(1-chance) many thanks christian ############################################################################### true-negativ:7445 false-positive:3410 false-negativ:347 true-positiv:772 classification-aggrement:68,6%
2018 Aug 30
2
Panic / EL6 / KVM / kernel-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.x86_64
Am 30.08.2018 um 06:37 schrieb Simon Matter <simon.matter at invoca.ch>: > >> Since the update from kernel-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.x86_64 >> to kernel-2.6.32-754.3.5.el6.x86_64 I can not boot my >> KVM guests anymore!? The workstation panics immediately! >> >> I would not have expected this behavior now (last phase of OS). >> It was very robust until now
2006 Aug 31
2
need help with an interaction term
Hello! I?m fitting a model with glm(family binomial). The best model counts 9 Variables and includes an interaction term that was generated by the product of to continuous variables (a*b). All variables are correlated under a value of 0.7 (Spearman rank order) While the estimates of both main effects are negativ, the resulting interaction term is positiv. This change of sign makes it difficult to
2002 Jul 30
1
Problem with legend
Hi! I have a problem using the legend command. I typed as follows: plot(foo bar...) legend(0.6,10, c("True Positiv", "False Positive", "False Negative","True Negative"), col = c("black",2,3,4),lty=c(1,1,1,1),pch=c(0,0,0,0), merge = TRUE, bg='gray90') The plot and its legend is displayed ok. The I apply a dev.cop2eps on it to save the
2010 Sep 26
8
the function doesn´t work
hey, my function doesn?t work. can somebody help me? the graphic doesn?t work and also the function. thnx a lot. N=10 n=100 p_0=c(1/5,1-1/5) power = function(p,m) { set.seed(1000) H=matrix(0,nrow=N,ncol=1) for(i in 1:N) { x <- matrix(rnorm(n, 0, 0.5), ncol = m) y <- matrix(rnorm(n, 0, 0.8), ncol = m) l <- diag(cor(x, y)) q_1 = qnorm(0.05, 0, 0.05) q_2 = qnorm(1 - 0.05, 0, 0.05)
2002 Jul 09
2
package relimp
Hi, i'm newbie for this, but it's very interesting, but how i have to interpret the results if i get i.e. this results ? Is it correct - if the "Ratio of effect sd" is positiv than the Numerator effects are bigger , and the negative case vice-versa ? Ratio of effect standard deviations: 0.954 Log(sd ratio): -0.047 (se 0.828) Approximate 95% confidence
2018 Aug 30
1
Panic / EL6 / KVM / kernel-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.x86_64
> Am 30.08.2018 um 17:24 schrieb Simon Matter <simon.matter at invoca.ch>: > >> Am 30.08.2018 um 06:37 schrieb Simon Matter <simon.matter at invoca.ch>: >>> >>>> Since the update from kernel-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.x86_64 >>>> to kernel-2.6.32-754.3.5.el6.x86_64 I can not boot my >>>> KVM guests anymore!? The workstation panics
2011 Jun 01
3
error in model specification for cfa with lavaan-package
Dear R-List, (I am not sure whether this list is the right place for my question...) I have a dataframe df.cfa
2007 Jun 21
1
Basic Question on error(_(...
I'm sorry to bother this list with such trivial questions, but I'm trying to take Prof. Ripley's advice in porting some Lapack wrappers into my own code, because they are not public. I'm specifically choosing programs from R-2.5.0/src/modules/lapack/Lapack.c. I can't seem to understand the context in functions such as: <snip> error(_("the leading minor
2003 May 30
2
Coefficients: (20 not defined because of singularities)
Hello, I am trying to run a linear regression analysis on my data set. For some reason most variables are removed due to singularities. My linear regression looks this way (I am using only partial data, which is selected by flags): fm<-lm(log(cplex6.time..sec..[flags]) ~ cplex6.cities[flags] + log(1/features.meanOver.frust[flags]) + log(1/features.meanOver.minDist[flags]) + [...]
2006 Feb 18
2
Application Faxing using SIP
I have a specific business problem that I'm hoping someone has ideas and/or has already worked out a solution. My application needs to be able to automatically create and issue faxes to many different fax machines. The volume is going to be very high. And it is only about sending faxes and not receiving them. My application is hosted by an ASP but the Linux (Fedora 2) server is
2018 Aug 29
7
Panic / EL6 / KVM / kernel-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.x86_64
Since the update from kernel-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.x86_64 to kernel-2.6.32-754.3.5.el6.x86_64 I can not boot my KVM guests anymore!? The workstation panics immediately! I would not have expected this behavior now (last phase of OS). It was very robust until now (Optiplex Workstation). I see some KVM related lines in the changelog.diff. Before swimming upstream: Does some one have problems
2010 Sep 07
1
bind failed on port 445 socket_addr = 0.0.0.0.
Hi, I've just upgraded an old samba 3.0.23 on an old Fedora Core 5 to samba 3.5.4 using an rpm built from the source. Everything works fine, but when i start the server i get some error messages(see below). Before i start the server there is no connection (tested with lsof and fuser) on the 139 and 445 ports, smbd or nmbd aren't running. With the old version i never had this
2008 Jan 24
2
writing pid file earlier
I''m using god* to monitor my mongrels. God looks at pid files to know the status of the cluster. It seems as though mongrel does not write a pid file until it has loaded the entire rails/project environment, which in my case, takes upwards of 90 seconds. Meanwhile, god is freaking out because it thinks that there aren''t mongrels running, and it tries to start them. Thankfully I
2002 Feb 14
1
Advice on using barplot
Greetings- I'm venturing into a new (for me) area of using R: some presentation graphics based on R data. I'd like to compare two distributions of ordinal variables in relatively small (N=203 and 207) subsets of an R dataset. I can get a reasonably good picture of the distributions' differences with: x11() plot(table(hcd.df$auth.sum[hcd.df$datecat==1]),
2014 Feb 24
2
Very slow download with pxelinux > 4.07 on specific hardware
Hi there, We had to setup a pxelinux on a new server (windows 2012) and used the latest release of pxelinux 6.0.2. Everything went ok on my first client test machine : dell optiplex 740. Pxe was really fast (vesamenu with large background image was appearing in less than 3 secondes) But on different client machine i got different results : On optiplex 790 (core i5 with intel 82579 nic) and
2014 Mar 10
3
Very slow download with pxelinux > 4.07 on specific hardware
?Hi,? On 10 March 2014 18:13, Eric PEYREMORTE <eric.peyremorte at iut-valence.fr>wrote: > Ok i give up. I will stick with the old version version (4.07) which works > well with dell 380 and 790. > > I tried to understand what happened between 4.07 and 5 but i don't have > the skill to understand low level c. > > Seems that the memory management changed a lot, maybe
2001 Dec 05
5
using rsync with Mac OS X
Rsync looks like a good tool for keeping files synchronized between two computers, such as a desktop and laptop. However, Mac OS uses a forked file system, with the second fork storing data critical to some files (such as applications) as well as type and creator information matching files up with the appropriate apps and file types. Mac OS X comes with a command-line utility called ditto
2014 Feb 24
2
Very slow download with pxelinux > 4.07 on specific hardware
Yes on optiplex 790 i upgraded from A07 to A18 (there was a nic upgrade) but it didn't change anything.. On optiplex 380 i upgraded from bios A01 to A07(don't know if upgrade contained pxe or not)... I tried, lpxelinux.0 and it wasn't faster. Only v4.07 helped on these machines. Tomorrow, i will give a try with 6.03pre2. In wireshark, i saw no errors, the packet length was the
2014 Mar 11
2
Very slow download with pxelinux > 4.07 on specific hardware
Le 11/03/2014 00:56, Gene Cumm a ?crit : > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Schlomo Schapiro <schlomo at schapiro.org> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On 10 March 2014 18:13,