similar to: can't add cpu's to virtual guest

HI, I've just begun using libvirt as part of my KVM installation and have been having some confusion regarding networking of my virtual guests. I'm not sure if I should even be sending this to this mailing list and if not please let me know and if possible where I should be sending this inquiry. I understand I can setup a dedicated bridged interface for my guest. But as for the virbr

Hi all, i was using bdrb a while ago and it wasn''t stable enough in version 0.2.1 for doing the job - it loss jobs or did execute only the first one invoked and so on. Now i gave the new version a try and i found a bug at playing around. When i start a worker_method over the normal Unix scheduler bdrb will start as much as possible the worker_method after the :end-time is reached.

Hey all, Bit of a bogus question here as I only have a basic understanding of CVS and Subversion. A lot of the windows development tools we use in the office have CVS or Subversion modules allowing us greater source code control. It would be wonderful to have a samba share that acts as an interface to a CVS or Subversion backend. That way we can use any development tool and simply save our

Michael, In lld, we have places that used nested a ErrorOr<std::unique_ptr<xx>> and I often hit compiler errors that require breaking up expressions to work around. Do you have suggestions on how to code the following simple examples to not error? Can some of these be fixed in ErrorOr.h? Or am I totally not getting something? -Nick struct Foo { void doit(); };

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: > Michael, > > In lld, we have places that used nested a ErrorOr<std::unique_ptr<xx>> and > I often hit compiler errors that require breaking up expressions to work > around. Do you have suggestions on how to code the following simple > examples to not error? Can some of these be

Eric, I have a RHEL6.0 machine running libvirt 0.8.7-18. I am running into issue mentioned in one of the previous posting. https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2011-December/msg00059.html # virsh start <domain> error: Failed to start domain <domain> error: operation failed: failed to read qemu header # od -N 128 -tx1z /path/to/domain.save 0000000 The workaroud to run

Hi, I'm noticing an unexpected difference between targets when I hit a dbgtrap in the debugger. Consider this simple llvm function: define void @do_break() { entry: call void @llvm.debugtrap() ret void } If I compile that with llc and use lldb to launch a program that calls it, on x86_64 linux (Ubuntu 18.04), here's what I see at the stop: Process 130404 stopped * thread #1,

Hi! I am still working on the Win64 EH code and now have a pretty usable result. (The MC part is already posted to llvm-commits, the other part follows soon. If you are curious the whole patch is here: http://www.redstar.de/ldc/win64eh_all_20130524.diff.) However, in one case I have a problem with LLVM being too smart. Consider the following D code: void doIt() { printf("doIt:

Have searched through the archives but have been unable to find any related issues - hopefully I'm not bringing up an old topic. Am using RW1041 on a Windows NT on a machine with 1Gb of memory. Have a function doit() that reads in a chunk of data using readBin, performs a regression, saves out coeffs and then returns. When using Rgui with the default memory limit of 256Mb I'm able to

On Nov 21, 2013, at 4:07 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: > Michael, > > In lld, we have places that used nested a ErrorOr<std::unique_ptr<xx>> and I often hit compiler errors that require breaking up expressions to work around. Do you have

Full_Name: Bill Simpson Version: 65.1 OS: linux Submission from: (NULL) (193.62.250.209) Try this code as separate lines entered interactively, then try doit() doit<-function() { x<-seq(1,10) y1<-x+rnorm(10,1,1.5) y2<-x+rnorm(10,1,1) t.test(x,y1,paired=TRUE) t.test(x,y2,paired=TRUE) } doit() apparently executes only the last of a series of t.test()s. Maybe this is no bug,

>myDF = data.frame(id=c("A10","A20"),d1=c(.3,.3),d2=c(.4,.4),d3=c(-.2,.5),d4=c(-.3,.6),d5=c(.5,-.2),d6=c(.6,-.4),d7=c(-.9,-.5),d8=c(-.8,-.6)) >doit=function(x)c(x[1],sum_LK_positive=sum(x[-1][x[-1]>0]),sum_LK_negative=sum(x[-1][x[-1]<0])) > myDF id d1 d2 d3 d4 d5 d6 d7 d8 1 A10 0.3 0.4 -0.2 -0.3 0.5 0.6 -0.9 -0.8 2 A20 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 -0.2

In the context of calling R from another program (namely gretl, http://gretl.sourceforge.net ) I'm trying to understand the interactions of the R init file (corresponding to the environment variable RPROFILE) and the source() function. I'll illustrate my problem with the following simplified contrast implemented in the bash shell (with R 2.7.1). 1. Works fine: allin at myrtle:~/Rfoo$

Although I owe thanks to Ramus and Ivan, I still do not know how to write and "advanced" function. My most recent try (after looking at the material Ramus and Ivan set) still does not work. I am trying to run the lm function on two different formulae: 1) y~x, 2) y~x+z Any corrections would be appreciated! Thank you, John doit <- function(x){ ds <- deparse(substitute(x))

Hi all, Prefix: I am a frustrated Java coder in R. I am coding a medium sized ecosystem modelling program in R. I have changed to using S4 objects and it has cost me an order of magnitude in execution speed over the functional model. I cannot afford this penalty and have found that it is the result of all the passing-by-value of objects. I see that you can now safely inherit from

myDF: d1 d2 d3 d4 d5 -0.166910351 0.022304377 -0.00825924 0.008330689 -0.000925938 -0.166910351 0.022304377 -0.00825924 0.008330689 -0.000925938 -0.166910351 0.022304377 -0.00825924 0.008330689 -0.168225938 -0.166910351 0.022304377 -0.00825924 0.008330689 -0.168225938 -0.166910351 0.022304377 -0.00825924 0.008330689 -0.168225938 -0.166910351

OK, I solved it all ( so far :) ), mixing in some load-instructions and called on the result of that, which worked. Here is the skeleton-code: %kernel = type { int ()* } int puts_kernel(){...} ; main() %theKernel = malloc %kernel %puts_kernelPTR = getelementptr %kernel* %theKernel, long 1, ubyte 0 store int ()* %puts_kernel, int ()** %puts_kernelPTR %tmp.11 = load int ()** %puts_kernelPTR

On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Anders Alexandersson wrote: > OK, I solved it all ( so far :) ), mixing in some load-instructions and > called on the result of that, which worked. > > Here is the skeleton-code: > > %kernel = type { int ()* } > > int puts_kernel(){...} > > ; main() > > %theKernel = malloc %kernel > %puts_kernelPTR = getelementptr %kernel* %theKernel,

R-Helpers, I'm sorry to have to ask this -- I've not used R very much in the last 8 or 10 months, and I've gotten rusty. I have the following (ff2 is a subset of a much, much larger dataset): > ff2 hostName user sys idle obsTime 10142 fred 0.4 0.5 98.0 2007-11-01 02:02:18 16886 barney 0.5 0.2 94.6 2007-10-25 19:12:12 8795 fred 0.0 0.1 99.8

I am trying to parse LLVM IR from a bit code file. I went through the following steps. hello.cpp #include <iostream> int main() { std::cout << "Hello world!" << "\n"; return 0;} dump.cpp #include <llvm/IR/Module.h>#include <llvm/IRReader/IRReader.h>#include <llvm/IR/LLVMContext.h>#include <llvm/Support/SourceMgr.h> using