similar to: samba 3.5.6 as PDC & LDAP - roaming profile problem

Hi. I used to have samba set up on a Fedora Core 3 server that acted as a PDC for a dozen Windows XP clients. I hade roaming profiles working fine. Then I decided to upgrade (reformat) to Fedora Core 6 for the added harware support. I didn't save the right files and hosed my roaming profile (SID issue, I guess). Now I'm remaking the PDC on Fedora Core 6. I'll start everyone off

Hi, I have roaming profile issue on my SAMBA PDC with an LDAP backend running on FreeBSD 6.3. It seems that randomly, user's profile get "corrupted" on windows XP. When that happens, the user log in as usual (%userprofile% variable is set and all the share are properly connected) but he gets a default desktop configuration (default wallpaper, english keyboard layout...while i'm

Is there nobody who can help me :-( -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: samba-bounces+louis=van-belle.nl@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces+louis=van-belle.nl@lists.samba.org] Namens Louis van Belle Verzonden: woensdag 14 september 2005 17:08 Aan: samba@lists.samba.org Onderwerp: [Samba] XP Profile write ok, no read. Hi, I still have a problem with samba and profiles. The profile is

Hi, I still have a problem with samba and profiles. The profile is correctly written to the profile share. but when i logon a other computer, logon takes ages.. and im unable to do anything registry is locked for example. ( see logs below ) when i copy the network profile to the local computer there is no problem. ( because the local profile is used ) OS : Linux Kernel 2.6.11 ( custom build

whoops, i didn't have much luck attaching the entire file, hopefully this link will work. http://www.lebox.org/u/milan/samba/userenv-clip.txt here's a piece of the log that looks interesting, any hints? USERENV(a0.80) 15:42:18:872 MyGetDomainDNSName: MyGetUserName failed for dns domain name with 1355 USERENV(a0.80) 15:42:18:872 CheckUserInMachineForest: MyGetDomainName failed with 1355.

Hello, actually I am trying to implement a samba PDC server with a LDAP backend where user are authenticated with. Additionally the users' profiles should be stored on it, whicht only works for one user, not the 3 other. The point is, I don't see the difference between them so it should work for all or none. This is what I have in my smb.conf regarding this: [global] logon

First some information on the system set up. OS: CentOS 4.3 Samba 3.0.10 FDS 7.1 Samba is acting as a PDC for our network. We have both windows 2000 and windows XP client machines. They are all joined to our domain. Everything "seems" to be fine except that when a user logs into a machine they can not make even simple changes to setting such as folder options (ie. view file extensions).

Hi Matt, Run these commands on all the bricks of the replica pair to get the attrs set on the backend. On the bricks of first replica set: getfattr -d -e hex -m . <brick path>/.glusterfs/10/86/ 108694db-c039-4b7c-bd3d-ad6a15d811a2 On the fourth replica set: getfattr -d -e hex -m . <brick path>/.glusterfs/ e0/c5/e0c56bf7-8bfe-46ca-bde1-e46b92d33df3 Also run the "gluster volume

Hi Matt, The files might be in split brain. Could you please send the outputs of these? gluster volume info <volname> gluster volume heal <volname> info And also the getfattr output of the files which are in the heal info output from all the bricks of that replica pair. getfattr -d -e hex -m . <file path on brick> Thanks & Regards Karthik On 16-Oct-2017 8:16 PM,

Attached is the heal log for the volume as well as the shd log. >> Run these commands on all the bricks of the replica pair to get the attrs set on the backend. [root at tpc-cent-glus1-081017 ~]# getfattr -d -e hex -m . /exp/b1/gv0/.glusterfs/10/86/108694db-c039-4b7c-bd3d-ad6a15d811a2 getfattr: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file:

I've been following this particular thread as I have a similar issue (RAID6 array failed out with 3 dead drives at once while a 12 TB load was being copied into one mounted space - what a mess) I have >700K GFID entries that have no path data:Example:getfattr -d -e hex -m . .glusterfs/00/00/0000a5ef-5af7-401b-84b5-ff2a51c10421# file: .glusterfs/00/00/0000a5ef-5af7-401b-84b5-

Hi Jim, Can you check whether the same hardlinks are present on both the bricks & both of them have the link count 2? If the link count is 2 then "find <brickpath> -samefile <brickpath/.glusterfs/<first two bits of gfid>/<next 2 bits of gfid>/<full gfid>" should give you the file path. Regards, Karthik On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Jim Kinney

When writing to a newly created btrfs (vanilla 2.6.33-rc6, sparc64) the following messages are printed: [28617.650231] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] [28617.745783] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] [28654.589492] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] [28654.685036] Kernel

In my case I was able to delete the hard links in the .glusterfs folders of the bricks and it seems to have done the trick, thanks! From: Karthik Subrahmanya [mailto:ksubrahm at redhat.com] Sent: Monday, October 23, 2017 1:52 AM To: Jim Kinney <jim.kinney at gmail.com>; Matt Waymack <mwaymack at nsgdv.com> Cc: gluster-users <Gluster-users at gluster.org> Subject: Re:

Hi there, I try to move our W2K Domain to samba. I managed to dump a list of the old users with its SID's and created them on the samba domain which has the same sid like the old W2k domain. Then the users should be able to use their old roaming profile without changing the profiles sid. This works if the computer which acesses the domain has already the profile on its disk. If the

I'm not so lucky. ALL of mine show 2 links and none have the attr data that supplies the path to the original. I have the inode from stat. Looking now to dig out the path/filename from xfs_db on the specific inodes individually. Is the hash of the filename or <path>/filename and if so relative to where? /, <path from top of brick>, ? On Mon, 2017-10-23 at 18:54 +0000, Matt Waymack

Hey Matt, >From the xattr output, it looks like the files are not present on the arbiter brick & needs healing. But on the parent it does not have the pending markers set for those entries. The workaround for this is you need to do a lookup on the file which needs heal from the mount, so it will create the entry on the arbiter brick and then run the volume heal to do the healing. Follow

OK, so here?s my output of the volume info and the heal info. I have not yet tracked down physical location of these files, any tips to finding them would be appreciated, but I?m definitely just wanting them gone. I forgot to mention earlier that the cluster is running 3.12 and was upgraded from 3.10; these files were likely stuck like this when it was on 3.10. [root at tpc-cent-glus1-081017 ~]#

Hi Jim & Matt, Can you also check for the link count in the stat output of those hardlink entries in the .glusterfs folder on the bricks. If the link count is 1 on all the bricks for those entries, then they are orphaned entries and you can delete those hardlinks. To be on the safer side have a backup before deleting any of the entries. Regards, Karthik On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 3:18 AM, Jim

I have 14,734 GFIDS that are different. All the different ones are only on the brick that was live during the outage and concurrent file copy- in. The brick that was down at that time has no GFIDs that are not also on the up brick. As the bricks are 10TB, the find is going to be a long running process. I'm running several finds at once with gnu parallel but it will still take some time.