similar to: Domain users are loosing there groups after some time.

Hello, i try to create a samba server for more then one trusted domain. I know there were some issues with samba 3.5, and in the internet i always read, i should use samba 3.4. So i wanted to give 3.6 a chance. I first tried autorid with a config like this: winbind enum users = yes winbind enum groups = yes idmap backend = autorid idmap gid = 100000-1499999

Hi all, I have joined samba server (3.0.14a-2) to an ADS. I can copy, move and remove files from any windows workstation and also I can set ACLs. I need migrate files from 4 w2k servers to samba server and preserve ACL's. One server are into ADS domain, but the others server are into others domains. I use robocopy.exe to migrate files and folders. When I run robocopy the files and folders are

I'm seeing a lot of these errors from a Samba 4.13.0 DC running on Debian Buster, the smb.conf is untouched from that which was created via a classic upgrade. =============================== Oct 24 10:25:43 srvr01 samba[26688]: [2020/10/24 10:25:43.886363, 0] ../../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:352(samba_runcmd_io_handler) Oct 24 10:25:43 srvr01 samba[26688]: /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_dnsupdate:

When Kaspersky adds the following to smb.conf I can't connect from XP. If I comment out "vfs object" connection is restored. <snip> [store-00] # ADDED BY KASPERSKY ANTI-VIRUS FOR SAMBA SERVERS 5.0 vfs object = kavsamba5-smb-3.0.2 comment = File Directories path = /store-00 browseable = yes writeable = yes valid users = frank read only = no

Hi, Am 25.03.2019 um 14:12 schrieb Marco Gaiarin via samba: > [...] > Some drivers there's no way to load (for example, some samsung MFP). > Some other load, but you have to do 2-5 try before they work. I did now try many different drivers from different vendors none of them worked thus I think there is something else wrong. I then did some more tests, trying to find anything being

On 24/10/2020 18:05, Sonic wrote: > On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 12:46 PM Sonic <sonicsmith at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Who is user '5035' ? >> No clue, all users have a uidNumber in 1000-1999 with all sids ending >> in 2000-2999. > Sorry that was from the AD side, the same client with the > 192.168.7.176 address has a local unix uid of 5035 - I have not yet

Hi, I am running Samba 3.6.19 and making my way through all the Active Directory documentation. I have joined various Linux boxes to a Windows Server 2008 R2 Active Directory domain. Windows 7 users who log on with their domain accounts can mount the correct shares exported by the Linux boxes without having to supply any additional credentials. All working perfectly! However, I have a

Hello, i had to upgrade a server from 3.6 to 4.0.10. Now i have a problem had already i solved again. The problem is that a machines program is old and require dos filetime resolution = yes but i does not work with the new 4.0.10 [produktion] path=/home/filestore/produktion browseable = yes writable = yes # create mask = 0777 # directory mask = 0777 #

Hi, We are running a samba fileserver, access controlled using posix acl (right 770, with users/groups on the filesystem level. Therefore samba shares look like this: [share] path = /srv/academic read only = no writable = yes create mask = 0770 directory mask = 0770 Now certain users complain that they cannot access certain folders, but looking at the folders from the linux fileystem, their

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ******************************************************************** The contents of this email are intended exclusively for the addressee. If you are not the addressee you must not read use or disclose the email contents ; you should notify us immediately [ by clicking "Reply" ] and delete this email. Nationwide monitors e-mails to ensure its systems

Hello, I'm having a permissions problem I just can't quite figure out. I can not access any directory that is owned by my userid if the permissions are 700. If I change them to 770, with my default group on the directory, then I can access the directory. This was working fine with Fedora 19 for several years, and it broke when I upgraded to Fedora 22, and still broken with F23. my

Hi, I have a very odd problem which perhaps is not related to Samba but to be sure... I have a RH6.2 2.2.20 ACLs Samba server 2.2.2 and everything is/was running fine partaking in a Windows 2000 domain. I needed to reboot the server. It has come up and I am getting "input/output errors" all over the logs when I try and access any of the shares on the raid array from a Windows client

Hello there, sorry - my first mail seems to be lost? Might be I am wrong, but it seems that the behavior of wide link option has been changed since 2.2.7. So we have some problems on our large side to upgrade to 2.2.8a. Here is what I found, but it may be not the intention of samba developer! There ist a new function called readlink_checkin smbd/vfs.c. In this function is a pattern compare

I am seeing some odd behavior on a Solaris 8 system. If I try to access a symlinked file, reduce_name is having a problem with the link >From a level 10 log: [2003/05/12 11:50:12, 3, pid=18558] lib/util.c:(387) unix_clean_name [/disk2/OC192/syee_test1.bat] [2003/05/12 11:50:12, 3, pid=18558] smbd/vfs.c:(800) reduce_name [disk2/OC192/syee_test1.bat] [/vobstore] [2003/05/12 11:50:12, 3,

Server: Debian Wheezy 7.3, ECC RAM, updated via cron-apt Version: 4.1.4 Clients: Windows 8.1 Pro Environment: Active Directory, installed from scratch (no migration), roaming profiles, group policies for printers, network mappings, ... Hello everyone, I've upgraded my Samba installation from 4.0.14 (which was working more or less fine) to 4.1.4 yesterday - via Sernet packages, i. e. just

hello bonjour, I am facing the following problem Je suis confront? au probl?me suivant configuration 1 server Wk23 as domain-server 1 server samba 3.0.24 client XP-PRO Samba server is supposed to be only file-server (and http server), just as member of the domain, because w2k3 is the domain-server sentence "net rpc join -U xcoudin%mypassword" worked correctly, samba-machine answered

On 3/3/2016 2:02 PM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > It would help if you would provide some information about your system: > - Samba version - smb.conf - "ls -ld" of the directory - etc. Regards, > Marc Hello, version: samba-4.3.4-1.fc23.x86_64 ls -ld: ls -ld /home/blaster drwxrwx--- 76 blaster users 4096 Mar 3 14:15 /home/blaster testparm Load smb config files from

Hello everyone! After running Samba on several machines for some years, I just came accross a rather strange problem. The short story is that the special user home shares are readable, but not writeable. Here's the long story: The system is a freshly set-up Debian Squeeze, right out of the box. This is the Samba config: -------------------------------- 8<

Hello all, I'm having a problem with Winbind resolving some users from AD on a W2KSP4 server running SFU 3.5 [8.0.1969.1]. All users and groups in the AD domain have been assigned UIDs and GIDs via SFU. The Linux fileserver is running CentOS 5.3 with Samba 3.0.33-3.7.el5. The fileserver has been joined to the domain using authconfig with proper modifications made to nsswitch and pam.

Hi, I just compiled samba 3.0.23 on our Sun Solaris 8 server. 3.0.22 was running fine and I used the same compiler options for 3.0.23. $ ./configure --with-acl-support --prefix=/usr/local/samba3023 --with-quotas --with-included-popt --without-ldap --with-vfs gcc version 3.4.2 GNU Make 3.80 Running make now throws a lot these warnings: [-snip-] Linking nsswitch/libnss_wins.so ld: warning: