similar to: network problems

This is my system info: Debian Release: 10.5 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 5.4.60-1-pve (SMP w/16 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh

someone recommended that i should give br0 the same hardware address as eno2. I did that, and restarted the vm, and it still does not work. Here is my current host interface config: ip a 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft

I have a setup with two Internet providers. One circuit (net0 == eth1) is used primarily for employees and tunnels to other sites. The other (net1 == eth2) is for the production machines that customers access. Everythung works in teh sense that packets get to where they are sent (mostly) but I recently I had a sniffer on the system and noticed a problem I cannot solve. traffic coming in

Hello Lartc Mailing List: Been working on something the last week and a half and ALMOST have it working.., just need a few pointers from the wizards on this mailing list to nail it. Ok, my setup is a hub and spoke arrangement, hub is Cisco 2821 with IOS 12.4. Spokes are ruggencom RX1000 routers, Debian based with the following versions installed: rx1000test:~# uname -a Linux rx1000test

Hi, this is propably bridge related and not really a xen problem, but it might help someone: Some of our domUs are not able to arp. Arp -n show (incomplete), and doing a tcpdump shows, that on the dom0''s eth0 the arp request goes out, the response comes in, but on the vifX.0 interface the arp response is gone. dom0# tcpdump -ni eth0 arp who-has 10.32.2.51 tell 10.32.7.70 arp reply

Hi, I would like to run a network firewall as a VM on a KVM host. There are ~ 25 VLANs delivered to the KVM host on three dedicated links, no LACP or other things. I have the VLANs 100-180 on the host's enp1s0, the VLANs 200-280 on the host's enp2s0 and the VLANs 300-380 on the host's enp3s0. To save myself from configuring all VLANs on the KVM host, I'd like to hand the entire

We switched over from a bordermanager firewall to a shorewall firewall. Some stuff is not working now. I realized that I had not created the route for the network that is not working however once I created it, it still didn''t work. Most of our network is fine however some pieces are not working. [Net] - [Shorewall] - [LAN] - [Cisco] - [Clients and servers not working] The firewall

Hi, I posted this question yesterday on the Openvpn mailing list, with no response, figured I will ask here too. I have been using openvpn for quite a while, no major problems encountered. Now I need to allow the server to access the lan of the client, and I can not figure out the routing. This is what I have after the tunnel is brought up: SERVER (A.A.A.A) Arx:~# ip addr ... 3: eth1:

Having a problem with the 3 interface setup. I can get DMZ hosts, and FW to see internet, but anything on LOC interface is unable to get out. My first post to the list didn''t have the information needed, sorry for that, but thank you for pointing me to more resources. I''ve looked at the problem myself some more, but am still stuck. Shorewall Version: 2.2.1 ip addr show 1:

Hello Tom, I''ve been using Shorewall for years without problems. My previous version of shorewall was 1.4.6b-1. Everything worked just fine. Today I upgraded using rpm to 2.0.8-1. After update no one can connect to any interface from net. Server can connect to outside world fine and those described in routestopped have no problem connecting. Any help correcting this problem would be

Hi folks, I read quite some posts about "Destination host unreachable" problems before, but none could help me to solve my issue. So here we go: This is what I am using: SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10 SP1 - Current with all updates Network configuration of my dom0: foobar:~ # ip a 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd

Hi, I am using linux kernle-2.6.15, iptables-1.4 and bridge-utils-1.4. Everything intslled without any issue and i am able to enable the bridge and traffic is also flowing without any issue. But i did not see any traffic on the iptables forward chain due to which i am not able to control the traffic. Do i requie enable anything more to make the traffic pass through iptables forward chain.

Hi, I need a help on Linux routing, if you have some sparse time. I''m based in Madagascar and my English is not good; so please forgive me. *What I want to come-up with: *My main goal is to download using two modems at the same time, and combining their bandwidth, but I have failed miserably. The reason is this: our country is still using poor slow internets, and I have seen on the

Hello Tom, I am not sure if you can help with this but I am at my wits end. If you hit this site and do a force refresh (ctrl + F5) the site will time out and lose connections. Do the same on port 443 and it does not time out??? The web site I am reffering to is www.tituswill.com I think the only problem is port 80. Do you have any idea how to diagnose this I have sent a dump of just

I'm pretty new to KVM and have a KVM CentOS 7.1 hypervisor running a few VMs. I'm moving all my VMs from an ESXi host as I want to use KVM in future. Most of my VMs are working except for one which is running a Sophos UTM router (Sophos UTM is similar to products like pfSense <https://www.pfsense.org/>, Smoothwall <http://www.smoothwall.org/> etc). The host has 3 physical NICs

Dear I need create second bridge xenbr1 for separate traffic between my virtual machine , I following this step but show message that Link veth0 is missing, how I can create veth0 ? When I run script for create xenbr1 ./network-bridge netdev=eth1 bridge=xenbr1 start Shwo this message Link veth0 is missing. This may be because you have reached the limit of the number of interfaces that the

Hello, I've been trying to implement a bridge in place for a clustered firewall at one of our office locations. Currently we NAT two class C's internally. We decided, for performance reasons, that it would make sense to put our servers into an official DMZ. So we started this bridging project. Our goal is to have two redundant firewalls in place. There is no need for active/active.

Yes. The problem is lollipop. I tried to install tinc on my brother's device which mount a cyano 10.1( android 4.2.2) and it works. I don't understand which is the problem with lollipop. Is there a firewall that block the packets? Andrea Squeri If you are running Lollipop / Android 5.x on your Nexus 5, then you are probably seeing the same issue I was with it. lollipop seems to change

Hi, First sorry for my bad English. I made a vpn wtih tinc for link my home and my two office. In Addition I want to configure my android device to link with my vpn. The topology of the net is this: cubox(a linux machine in my home with vpn address 192.168.0.20) groppalbero (a linux machine in my second office with vpn address 192.168.0.40) imac(a mac machine in my first office with vpn address

Hi, I'm not sure what sort of diagram you mean, but I'll have a try. Does this help? It sounds like I need to do something to enable routing on what I've labelled "NIC3" on the diagram - can you please explain what I need to do? [image: Inline image 1] Regards, Phill On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Ajey Gore <ajeygore@gmail.com> wrote: > Can you please drop a