similar to: samba 4 alpha 19 cannot join existing AD

I have a Win2k3 server and am trying to manage a Samba4 box (name:UBUNTUSERVER, running Ubuntu 12.04.3 + Samba 4.0.10) as a backup. All seemed well, but after a problem with replication (result 1306 WERR_REVISION_MISMATCH), I couldn't even demote the samba4 DC. So I deleted from SERVERW2K3, deleted /usr/local/samba and re-compiled everything. Also ran make quicktest, all seems OK. Now, this

On 1/11/2018 1:57 PM, Harsh Kukreja wrote: > Hi > > I have tried  using FQDN for DC1 and DC2 but still it is > failing.Please assist to fix > > samba-tool drs replicate iumdcdp01.iumnet.edu.na > <http://iumdcdp01.iumnet.edu.na> iumsvrpdc DC=iumnet,DC=edu,DC=na > --sync-forced -UAdministrator > INFO: Current debug levels: >   all: 9 >   tdb: 9 >  

Hi James Thanks for your response. hots -t A iumsvrpdc (use it's fqdn as well) I have verified it with the FQDN which says that the record iumsvrpdc.iumnet.edu.na exists Search for 'iumsvrpdc' objectGUID ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb '(invocationId=*)' --cross-ncs objectguid : it shows 2 records found # record 1 dn: CN=NTDS

I have a couple of Samba4 AD DCs replicating with Windows Server 2008 DCs. This has been sort of finicky, but I've managed to get it to work (mostly) for several weeks. However, I'm now having an issue where one of my Samba4 DCs will not replicate from any of the other DCs (Windows or Samba) in the domain (Error is WERR_BAD_NET_RESP). Replication output is below. If anyone has ideas of

On 1/11/2018 10:39 AM, Harsh Kukreja via samba wrote: > Hi > > The DRS sync between two Domain Controllers connected on one network is > failing. I have enabled the log level 9. > > samba-tool drs replicate 172.16.10.5 iumsvrpdc DC=iumnet,DC=edu,DC=na > --full-sync -UAdministrator > INFO: Current debug levels: > all: 9 > tdb: 9 > printdrivers: 9 >

Hi, Many of these syncing problems were solved in Samba 4.7 (and probably a few more in 4.8). There were a number of unresolved locking issues that we uncovered as well as some inconsistencies with Windows replication. I would try join a DC with one of the latest Samba versions and see if your problems persist. Cheers, Garming On 21/06/18 21:35, Chris Lewis via samba wrote: > Hello, >

Hi I have tried using FQDN for DC1 and DC2 but still it is failing.Please assist to fix samba-tool drs replicate iumdcdp01.iumnet.edu.na iumsvrpdc DC=iumnet,DC=edu,DC=na --sync-forced -UAdministrator INFO: Current debug levels: all: 9 tdb: 9 printdrivers: 9 lanman: 9 smb: 9 rpc_parse: 9 rpc_srv: 9 rpc_cli: 9 passdb: 9 sam: 9 auth: 9 winbind: 9 vfs: 9 idmap: 9

What does the WERR_BAD_NET_RESP means? I'm currently upgrading our DCs to 4.8.3 and I've noticed that the off-site DC has a sync problem of the CN=Configuration NC. The FSMO DC is still in the 4.5.5, but all other DCs, including the off-site are already on 4.8.3. Trying to sync the off-site DC with one of the updated DCs does not work either. The WERR_BAD_NET_RESP message already

Hi The DRS sync between two Domain Controllers connected on one network is failing. I have enabled the log level 9. samba-tool drs replicate 172.16.10.5 iumsvrpdc DC=iumnet,DC=edu,DC=na --full-sync -UAdministrator INFO: Current debug levels: all: 9 tdb: 9 printdrivers: 9 lanman: 9 smb: 9 rpc_parse: 9 rpc_srv: 9 rpc_cli: 9 passdb: 9 sam: 9 auth: 9 winbind: 9 vfs: 9

Hello, We have a Windows 2008 DC (inview-dc1 and a samba 4.4.16 (inview-dc2) server as a backup DC. The system for the most-part works OK, but occasionally the Samba DC goes wildly out of sync (with respect to group membership), normally after a change to a large group. I have noted previously before the out-of-sync event occurs, this command always fails thus : root at inview-dc2:~#

Thanks Garming. We currently use a standalone bind DNS server. Will the later version of samba work without the integrated DNS backend? Cheers Chris On 21/06/18 23:41, Garming Sam wrote: > Hi, > > Many of these syncing problems were solved in Samba 4.7 (and probably a > few more in 4.8). There were a number of unresolved locking issues that > we uncovered as well as some

Am 16.01.23 um 18:31 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > > On 16/01/2023 16:56, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >> Hi to all, >> Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the samba >> packages from the backports (4.17.4) and the bind9 from the backports >> (9.18). With me it comes on each further Domaincontroller to errors >> with the

On 16/01/2023 18:27, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > > > Am 16.01.23 um 18:31 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >> >> >> On 16/01/2023 16:56, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >>> Hi to all, >>> Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the samba >>> packages from the backports (4.17.4) and the bind9 from the backports

On 16/01/2023 18:56, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 16/01/2023 18:27, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >> >> >> Am 16.01.23 um 18:31 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> >>> >>> On 16/01/2023 16:56, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >>>> Hi to all, >>>> Is there a known problem when using Debian 11 together with the

Hi Stefan, I have exact that running: Samba 4.17.4 and bind 9.18 from the bullseye-backports. I my case "samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names" runs without any errors. As like 9.16 I use the "dlz_bind9_18.so" entry in named.conf. If you need further information to compare just ask. Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama Rowland Penny via samba schrieb am 16.01.2023 um

Ah, ok, just saw it. Sorry, I missed that. I can only add then, all three DC's in my little net are installed with bind 9.18 and working all the same without errors. Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama Stefan Kania via samba schrieb am 16.01.2023 um 20:47: > > > Am 16.01.23 um 20:35 schrieb Ingo Asche via samba: >> Hi Stefan, >> >> I have exact that running:

Am 16.01.23 um 20:35 schrieb Ingo Asche via samba: > Hi Stefan, > > I have exact that running: Samba 4.17.4 and bind 9.18 from the > bullseye-backports. > > I my case "samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names" runs without any errors. > On the first DC it's running like I expacted, but on the second one I'm having the provlem. > As like 9.16 I use the

i don't know if the problem with the command samba-tool gpo aclcheck is connect with the original problem, but is necesary resolv all warinings. I put de log level = 5 to check the report. this is the output: root at DC04:~# samba-tool gpo aclcheck INFO: Current debug levels: all: 5 tdb: 5 printdrivers: 5 lanman: 5 smb: 5 rpc_parse: 5 rpc_srv: 5 rpc_cli: 5 passdb: 5

Dear All, I have samba 4 installation which was upgraded from samba 3. Everything was working fine for about 6 months. Then I don't remember what I have done but after restart of server, it is impossible to log into Windows using Workgroup. The setup consists of several Windows XP and Windows 7 computer. Samba jest PDC. Looks like problems with configuration of Kerberos or around it.

Having lots of problems with a restored from backup installation of Samba 4.1.9 on FreeBsd cannot use windows tools to assign permissions to shares, and now when a problem creating a Gpo. with log level 10 this is the output: root at BSD:/home # samba-tool gpo create testgpo INFO: Current debug levels: all: 10 tdb: 10 printdrivers: 10 lanman: 10 smb: 10 rpc_parse: 10 rpc_srv: 10