similar to: Samba 3, Ubuntu 10, NAT, and firewall rules

Hi all, Love tinc by the way. It's a great VPN. I'm having issues with 2 nodes always talking through an intermediate node. My set up is a VPS in a cloud somewhere that's running tinc and 2 other nodes - one a roaming laptop (always NAT'd) and the other a server behind a dynamic IP home broadband connection (Not NAT'd but firewalled). Neither the laptop nor the home

Ok, I have a challenge - get two services working over a single port. (!) Sometimes it's a web service, sometimes it's a VNC service. Here's what I had in mind: 1) Server is normally a webserver listening on port 80, and normally has the following rules active: # iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT # iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j MASQUERADE 2)

All, I have my * box NAT'd with all ports forwarded that are SIP related (based on Wiki). I also have nat=yes, externalip=WAN address of firewall, internalip=LAN network of *. I have my Xten soft phone on a PC which is NAT'd behind firewall with ports forwarded. I have also followed instructions on Wiki for Xten. I can authenticate fine, and sip show peers shows my extension is OK,

Hi, I managed to get some more IP's from my ISP and am considering putting my Asterisk box on one of them, so it is not behind NAT anymore :) However I need to make sure it is secure, is anybody else doing this who would be so kind as to share their firewall rules/ideas? Many thanks Mike

Hi Everyone, For all the folk here on this list that offer VPS hosting, do you guys just give a VPS to a customer in a non-firewalled state? Cheers _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi, Is there a way that we can add custom IP-Tables rules in a nat'd physical host? I need some custom rules mentioned in physical host to access some services in the guest systems. Any hints on this? Regards, Kurian Thayil. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi All, My Samba server/firewall has three (two real, one virtual) network cards: eth0.5: connects to a terminal server eth0: internal network with about 10 XP workstations eth1: the Internet Samba is set to talk to only 12.0.0.1, eth0.5 and eth0. I have my firewall iptables rules set so that users on eth0.5 can only use the samba server on my server. They can not share with any other user on

Here's a good one for the group, I have 2 Ast servers behind a NAT (Sonicwall :-( ) connecting to the same server outside the NAT. Each of the 2 boxes behind register to the outside server. What I am wondering is, would there be a problem if both servers behind the NAT were listening on port 4569, I realized that the NAT'd port gets changed however I wasn't sure if this would be an

Hello all, My * box is up and running but the only problem is I can't send or receive calls via my FWD account. I have tried everything I can think of to fix this, but no luck. Does anyone have any tips for my sip.conf. I am running * behind a nat'd router/firewall. Thanks in advance, Bill

Greetings, I have a problem getting Asterisk registered as a UAC against the MetaSwitch call agent, because the customer insists on running it on a NAT'd box. Thus, the Contact: field in the REGISTER request betrays the private IP address of the Asterisk box, but the source IP of the message is a public one. Most registrars don't have a problem with this, including Asterisk. However,

I have noticed that you can't have multiple separate NAT style libvirt networks defined with the same private IP blocks. For example I have this default network: <network> <name>default</name> <uuid>13baf167-02ff-4312-928c-b82ed4df5785</uuid> <forward mode='nat'> <nat> <port start='1024' end='65535'/>

Hi All, I'm trying to understand how SIP re-invites work, if both parties are NAT'd and firewalled. I can't see how either party can initiate the conversation, and the far-end firewall would surely see any incoming packets as unsolicited, even with a STUN server giving the public IPs.. We recently moved networks, and my boss is telling me this used to work on the old network for

continuing discussions of 79xx issues. i've seen referenced and am experiencing difficulty getting a 7970 to work behind NAT to a public asterisk server. i am successful with 7960s. 1. SIP load is 70.8-3-3SR2S 2. config works fine if 7970 is connecting to an asterisk server a local LAN (same subnet) 3. when debugging it in a NAT'd environment I see the register and

Does anyone have any hints or suggestions on getting some JetDirect-based printers set up for bidirectional printing in Samba? We're using LPRng 3.8.0, ifhp 3.4.7, and samba 2.2.2 From the LPRng standpoint, the printers seem to be set up for bidirectional communication fine.. but how do we get Samba to allow bidirectional communication? Thanks in advance! Glenn --- Glenn E. Sieb,

On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 09:40:36 -0500 Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I just setup replication of sysvol between my two DC's using the > "Bidirectional Rsync/osync based SysVol replication workaround" and > all went well with two exception. > > First, it seems that since an upgrade to Openssh version 7.0 that >

Here is my setup: * is on a NAT'd subnet, but also has an externally routable IP address. I have a Snom360 that's external to this and behind NAT. The Snom360 can call other phones in * subnet (by their internal extension numbers) and voice is transmitted fine; however, when I attempt to check voicemail (or any * voice recordings for that matter) I can't hear them. The phone just

I am trying to make 1 soft SIP UA behind NAT connect to a public hard CISCO UA via a public asterisk server. The CISCO UA can hear the voice from the SIP UA but not vice versa. I do set nat to yes for the soft phone. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Below is my sip.conf [general] port = 8060 ; Port to bind to (SIP is 5060) bindaddr = 0.0.0.0 ; Address to bind to (all

Hi, I would like to get some feedback about the current status of the pre-RA machine scheduler bidirectional scheduling. I have tried enabling this on SystemZ, and found that it slightly increases spilling generally (in one benchmark with as much as 5%). Benchmarking do not indicate that bidirectional would be a win, either. Is this within the expected, or does it indicate something in the

I checked through the archives and I didn't see this one. This has been driving me absolutely crazy for months now and I finally tumbled to what was going on. I get hesitations of up to 2 minutes from some of our XP machines when printing to a printer on the Samba server. My first suspicion was that it was some kind of name resolving issue. I tried using the domain name of the Samba

Hey all, quick question: I have a server running Samba 2.2.3a which has two NAT'd private domains behind it (192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.88.0/24). The .88.0 subdomain has a wireless AP/router on it (192.168.88.254) which also does NAT (the wireless machines are on 192.168.92.0/24). The router has the IP of the second internal NIC as its gateway; the wireless machines have the