similar to: Heads up on major Firefox update incoming

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2012:0327 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0327.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: d2599a661b132aa2ddd7392eae5685646cf3c635d0ef0267599b8740f09c12e2 firefox-10.0.1-1.el6.centos.i686.rpm

m.roth at 5-cent.usschreef: Chuck Campbell wrote: > Is Firefox 38 still borked for Centos 5? > > It shows up as available for update, but I don't recall seeing anything > saying the problems noted here have been fixed. Dunno 'bout 5; I'd been waiting, since I thought I remembered folks here complaining about it breaking language support for 6, and I *know* that some folks

Hi, If the pristine centos:centos5 centos:centos6 images are not running on your brand new host running another linux distribution, you might be hitting this issue: https://github.com/CentOS/sig-cloud-instance-images/issues/62 https://bugs.alpinelinux.org/issues/6928 Cheers Tru -- Tru Huynh http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B -------------- next part

HTTPD on some of my CentOS5 systems is configured to run as user "nobody". Also, it needs access to some exported file systems. CentOS5 uses NFS3 so I changed the ownership of the files on the storage server to "nobody" to give httpd full permissions. Now I want to rebuild these systems with CentOS6 and httpd running as user "apache". The problem is how to give

Hi, This is slightly offtopic, but I have been trying to resolve that problem for two days now without much success. It looks like this may be something that works with CENTOS5, but not with CENTOS6! I have two machines, fileserver1 and server5. fileserver1 runs on CENTOS6 (virtualized, if this is important), server5 runs on Centos5. Both are running with the most recent updates. Server5 is a

On CentOS5 I was used to create a simple spec file where at the end I'll declare files and directories I wan't to package: --< Snip >-- %files %dir /opt/myapp %dir /opt/myapp/bin %dir /opt/myapp/etc /opt/myapp/bin/exec01 /opt/myapp/etc/myapp.conf ---- I'll copy the file in /usr/src/redhat/SPECS and run "rpmbuild -bb myapp.spec". On CentOS6 rpm-build package no longer

I just noticed an interesting behaviour of rup on CentOS5/6: run without any host args, it never prints results for CentOS6 machines. However, if a CentOS6 machine is queried directly, there is a result. It doesnt't matter whether the querying host runs CentOS5 or CentOS6. # rup |grep centos6host # rup centos6host centos6host up 12 days, 19:33, load average: 0.22 0.18 0.11 #

I just realised that pam_access no longer works under CentOS6 - or it works differently from CentOS5. Under CentOS5, I used this configuration to restrict access to root only: # cat /etc/security/access.conf + : root : ALL - : ALL : ALL # cat /etc/pam.d/system-auth-ac ... account required pam_access.so account required pam_unix.so account sufficient pam_localuser.so

Folks I just installed a centos6 system on a 64-bit box. My methods include remote administration, using ssh from a windows machine. I use this method successfully on several Centos5 boxes and one Centos6 (32bit) machine as well. However, on this latest one, I get inconsistent results with ssh. This is a server, SELINUX is disabled, it's command line only, and I have installed

Folks I just installed a centos6 system on a 64-bit box. My methods include remote administration, using ssh from a windows machine. I use this method successfully on several Centos5 boxes and one Centos6 (32bit) machine as well. However, on this latest one, I get inconsistent results with ssh. This is a server, SELINUX is disabled, it's command line only, and I have installed

Is anyone out there using CentOS5 integrated correctly with a Windows 2008 domain so that active directory authentication can be used for samba shares? I have tried the newer RPM's from SERNET up to 3.5 and 3.6 without any luck. The usual behavior is wbinfo returns the active directory users and groups but 'getent passwd' only returns local users. I also tried compiling samba from

Most of my desktops are still running CentOS5, but I have installed CentOS6 on a few of them. The users on those desktops are reporting that DNS lookups are slow, and from my brief tests, that does appear to be the case. After some googling, I found a suggestion to disable IPv6, but that didn't help. So I tried to figure out where the delay occurs using strace and ltrace, but that

icedtea-web package included with the distros is the plugin that handles javaws for firefox for both RHEL/CentOS 6 and 7 and openjdk. I have yet to find an app that cannot use openjdk instead of oracle java. It may be a little less streamlined, but it's functional. Ignore/cancel any pop ups that talk about updating java. If I missed this answer, I apologize as I receive the digests.

Hello, it looks like the usual way to do ipsec on centos5 won't work anymore on centos6 I installed ipsec-tools but an interface type IPsec is not recognized by the kernel ifup ipsec0 Device does not seem to be present, delaying initialization. I am not planning to use the awful OpenSwan, I Want to sue the Kame implementation which was working fine on CentOS5 any hints ? thank you

Is there any chance the system-config-netboot* rpms upstream removed from CentOS6 could be provided in extras? The CentOS5 SRPM builds cleanly under CentOS6, and upstream's workaround is insufficient as it only covers diskless clients, not helpful if you need pxeos.

Hi all, Somebody have tried to run a centos5 lxc guest under centos6 host?? Is it possible?? Thanks.

Installing 64bit CentOS6 only installs x86_64 and noarch RPMS - however, I have a number of legacy 32bit apps that require a number of 32bit RPMS to be installed. Does anyone know how to get the installer to install the 32bit versions of 64bit RPMS? i.e. in the way it does for CentOS5. Thanks James Pearson

Hi all. I'm trying to bring an Amazon VM into the LAN by following this guide [0]. However, it appears that OpenSSH on either RHEL7 or CentOS7 is broken as it is not creating tap interface but tun interface. I've tried this on both CentOS5 and CentOS6 and they both work as advertised! Downgrading the OS is not an option! CentOS5/6 gives me: ****************** tap1:

When I'm kickstarting a CentOS5 machine, there's a progress report that shows how many packages have been installed so far, how many left, how much time it has taken, how much longer to go, and estimate for the total install time. Under CentOS6, I only get a report about packages (completed: N of M). Is there any way to add the time information back on CentOS6? This is a text

According to the vulnerability test script from shellshocker.net, the latest bash versions on CentOS5 and CentOS6, 3.2-33.el5_11.4 and 4.1.2-15.el6_5.2, resp., are still vulnerable to CVE-2014-6277. In fact, on CentOS6, abrtd will send you a nice report about it. Does anyone know if upstream is working on a fix? [root at host ~]# bash ~/shellshock_test.sh CVE-2014-6271 (original shellshock):