similar to: Replacing a node

[Repost - last time this didn't seem to work] I've been running gluster for a couple of years, so I'm quite used to 3.0.x and earlier. I'm looking to upgrade to 3.1.1 for more stability (I'm getting frequent 'file has vanished' errors when rsyncing from 3.0.6) on a bog-standard 2-node dist/rep config. So far it's not going well. I'm running on Ubuntu Lucid x64

I saw a quick demo of HotLava's multiport ethernet cards at CeBIT last week. The guy there had a low-spec server with two multi-port 10Gbe cards in sitting there sustaining 200Gbit/sec. I was quite impressed, thought it might be of interest to gluster users. They're very pretty when they're all lit up :) http://www.hotlavasystems.com/ I also saw an interesting low-cost 'fat

I think this discussion probably came up here already but I couldn't find much on the archives. Would you able to comment or correct whatever might look wrong. What options people think is more adequate to use with Gluster in terms of RAID underneath and a good balance between cost, usable space and performance. I have thought about two main options with its Pros and Cons No RAID (individual

All, For our project, we bought 8 new Supermicro servers. Each server is a quad-core Intel cpu with 2U chassis supporting 8 x 7200 RPM Sata drives. To start out, we only populated 2 x 2TB enterprise drives in each server and added all 8 peers with their total of 16 drives as bricks to our gluster pool as distributed replicated (2). The replica worked as follows: 1.1 -> 2.1 1.2

Hi All, 3.4.0 and 3.3.2 releases of GlusterFS are now available. GlusterFS 3.4.0 can be downloaded from [1] and release notes are available at [2]. Upgrade instructions can be found at [3]. If you would like to propose bug fix candidates or minor features for inclusion in 3.4.1, please add them at [4]. 3.3.2 packages can be downloaded from [5]. A big note of thanks to everyone who helped in

Hi experts I have a machine which have 5 hard disk I want to use glusterfs to fast my disk my machine's IP is 123.224.178.67 my steps 1)create the volume gluster volume create vol1 123.224.178.67:/buildarea2 123.224.178.67:/buildarea3 123.224.178.67:/buildarea4 123.224.178.67:/buildarea5 123.224.178.67: /buildarea6 2)start the volume gluster volume start vol1 3)mount the volume

Hi Gluster users, I have a newbie question. I would like to implement Gluster system for my customer, but this customer have one big issue. The power supply to their office is not stable. It has happens many times, that the power will be disrupted without warning. My question is, when this kind of thing happen, how should I properly recover the gluster cluster? Should I start one node, make

I have been trying to get the dynamic parking working. For some reason when I park a call using this method the console says it is using the default parking context not the one I am trying to specidfy. It also is playing the parked extension to the caller. I am transfering the call to an extension that is doing a goto to the context below. Any ideas or examples on how to make this work.

Hi, Takumi! I tried your patch, and it did not help. Moreover, I tried to compile under Windows 7 and copy files to Windows 8, and received the same exception. So the problem seems to be in Windows 8 itself or some non-portable code inside LLVM. Could anyone tell me what LLVM code in ExecutionEngine is responsible for allocating and protecting memory for generated native functions? Best

Hi Victor, Try this fix by Marina Yatsina: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20120220/137532.html Nadav -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of lost Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 22:53 To: NAKAMURA Takumi; LLVM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Access Violation using ExecutionEngine on 64-bit Windows 8

Building on Mac OS X doesn't work. It fails with this error: configure: error: No 16 bit type found on this platform! I've posted the config.log here: https://gist.github.com/1878663 I think something is going wrong with how the configure script is detecting the platform. Thanks, aaron -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Ok I now have the basics for dynamic parking working but for some reason when a caller calls in and is parked with a transfer the return call dials the sip peer of the caller and not hte peer of the last party that parked the call. Anyone have any ideas on this? Also when a call is transfered to a parking space. the caller hears the space number. How can I stop that as well? Thanks Bryant

Hi Rotem, Thank to you, and especially to Marina! The problem gone. I'm a bit interested, what is the reason it worked in Win7, and not in Win8. I've recently used Process Explorer to discover, that the call was to ntdll.dll, which in Win8 is loaded to the totally different address. Best regards, Victor Milovanov Moscow State University graduate student 2012/3/3 Rotem, Nadav

Hi everyone! I've faced a strange problem after updating to Windows 8 Consumer Preview recently. It seems that LLVM inserts 4 calls to the same function at the start of generated code. The function's disassembly (taken from nearby computer with Windows 7) is: 00000000773A0DD0 sub rsp,10h 00000000773A0DD4 mov qword ptr [rsp],r10 00000000773A0DD8 mov qword ptr

Do you often find yourself doing this: active = double(''active'') active.should_receive(:first) users = double(''users'', active: active) account.should_receive(:users).and_return(users) for this: account.users.active.first ? Of course, we could use stub_chain, but that doesn''t let us know *where* the chain broke. Would you like to do this?

Hi, I'm sorry I forgot to mention I am compiling the bitcode using the JIT. The actual error, I get when I'm trying to get the function to the pointer. I'm using a custom front end that translates Android's Dalvik bytecode into LLVM bitcode based on Android ICS's modified LLVM version. Thanks, On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:55 PM, James Molloy <James.Molloy at arm.com>

I'm doing some tests running llvm on Android. I'm getting an error message saying: Unhandled instruction encoding format! I checked which instruction was causing this and it is ADDrsi, it appears to have format 42 << 7, which is definitely not available in ARMBaseInfo.h Any suggestions are welcome -- Guillermo A. Pérez (吉耶莫) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Viktor, could you try my patch? I guess they are __chkstk. http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20120220/137577.html ...Takumi

All, This buildbot is getting lots of assertion failures in the test suite. They were probably caused by my commit: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r151049 | foad | 2012-02-21 09:25:52 +0000 (Tue, 21 Feb 2012) | 6 lines Changed paths: M /llvm/trunk/lib/VMCore/LLVMContextImpl.h M /llvm/trunk/lib/VMCore/Type.cpp PR1210: make uniquing of struct and

Hello, So the current JIT will be superseded by the MCJIT completely and no further development should be expected for the current JIT? In any case, I am definitely interested in submitting a patch if you could help me by sending me in the right direction, since I really want this working. I managed to reproduce this behavior in LLVM 3.0 by modifying llc to read my .bc file and try to JIT the