similar to: smartd and smartctl

Hi Dear Community Friends, it is few days now, i am trying to figure out why DKIM is working / not working. Any assistance would be very much appreciable. Server IP is not blacklisted ever, MX, PTR SPF, DKIM records are available in DNS. why it is working at Gmail, why failing at Yahoo? Gmail dkim=pass header.i=@digital-infotech.net Yahoo: domainkeys=neutral (no sig);

Hi all, Not having issues setting this in Ubuntu or Windows but I cannot seem to add a static DNS or search path without it getting over written when networks restarts. The file dhclient.conf seems ignored. I would like to simply have a fixed DNS and search path added to what ever was found by the dhcp client. So I don't think peersdns=no is an option. Any advice is greatly

Hello I need a clean link for a Cent us download please I don't want to risk any virus'. Thank you kindly for such a wonderful program!

Hi all, I have this network: 10.1.20.0 - 10.1.23.0 /22 Broadcast 10.1.23.255 Say I have a machine with IP: 192.168.1.1 Now, I want to create virtual IP on it with ip command: 1. Is this ok? ip addr add 10.1.22.100/22 dev eth0:1 2. Should I define the broadcast too in the above command? If I don't define it, will the above command means the broadcast would be 10.1.25.255? Thank you. Fajar.

Not technically a centos question, but a lot of you guys seem to manage some large systems and I could use some clarification on a postfix setting.* *reject_unknown_client_hostname (in postfix < 2.3 reject_unknown_client) When I first used this there were issues with users trying to send mail through the server from hotels, wireless spots, etc. This was solved by pushing up permit

I have an ethernet device in my lan with a primary address 192.168.5.205 and a secondary address .217. I added the secondary address after network startup established the primary address by an ip addr add command: # ip addr add 192.168.5.217/24 broadcast 192.168.5.255 dev eth0 # ip addr show ... 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 link/ether

I have a CentOS 5 machine in which I'm trying to remove lvm. I dd'ed the file system to another partition, then dd'ed it back overwriting the lvm partition. I then modified menu.lst and fstab and replaced the paths to point to the correct device. When the system boots it's still looking for lvm. I can restore the system back to where it was with lvm, but I'm not sure what

hey centos long time no hear! :) I'm having a small issue where the backup jobs that I set to run in the crontab of the backup user do not appear to be running. Here's how I set it up (with crontab -e as the backup user): run amanda every night (check at 2:45 and backup at 3) 45 2 * * * /usr/sbin/amcheck /var/log/amanda/crontab/amcheck.log * 3 * * * /usr/sbin/amdump

Hello, I was wondering if anyone could tell me why so many processes are started on my system? Here is a list of them. I am trying to figure out why they are running and if I can stop them. Thnx. USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 2 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< 19:33 0:00 [migration/0] root 3 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? SN 19:33 0:00 [ksoftirqd/0]

last night I checked the log messages on the server Dell PE2950 6xSAS 146G I found the smartd running , I did not request such daemon [root at PowerEdge1 pons]# tail -f /var/log/messages Aug 25 08:27:30 PowerEdge1 smartd[8039]: Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/ Aug 25 08:27:30 PowerEdge1 smartd[8039]: Opened configuration file /etc/smartd.conf Aug 25 08:27:30 PowerEdge1

I have a system that is logging: smartd /dev/sda currently unreadble (pending) sectors smartd /dev/sda offline uncorrectable sectors The box continues to run fine. Doing "smartctl -H /dev/sda" says: test result: PASSED I have ran the "smartctl -t offline /dev/sda", after the 300+ seconds I rebooted and waited about 30 minutes and again got the above error, and smartctl -H

I'm looking to do a bit more monitoring of my 3ware 9550 with smartd, and wanted to see what others were doing with smart for monitoring 3ware hardware. Do you have the smartd.conf configured to test, or simply monitor health status? Are you monitoring the drive as centos sees it (/dev/sdX) or are you using the 3ware /dev/twaX for monitoring? Opinions and discussions are welcome :-P --

Hi, On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 11:25 +0200, Alessandro Baggi wrote: > === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === > SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED That's the line you are looking for. Since your disk apparently does not store an error log - not sure if that's something with SSDs in general or just with this particular disk - you will always have to invoke

I'm not used to using smartd, but have a new set of systems that don't have any sort of RAID on them, so I enabled smartd (18 systems 4 SATA drives each). Running CentOS 5.4 64-bit .. One of them has emailed me twice(despite it saying it would only email me once) saying it has 1 Offline uncorrectable sectors But when I try to find more information, smartctl seems to think everything is

I decided, after the last discussion of smartd and S.M.A.R.T. disks, to take a look in my /var/log/messages, and I'm seeing fair bit of this: Sep 10 20:11:23 mhrichter smartd[3361]: Device: /dev/sda, 4294967295 Offline uncorrectable sectors Sep 10 20:41:23 mhrichter smartd[3361]: Device: /dev/hdb, 21 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors Sep 10 20:41:24 mhrichter smartd[3361]: Device:

Hello, after update to 5.1 the smartctl will fail. I get this output: smartctl --all -d ata /dev/sda smartctl version 5.36 [i686-redhat-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-6 Bruce Allen Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/ === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === Device Model: HDS728080PLA380 Serial Number: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Firmware Version: PF2OA69A User Capacity: 82.348.277.760

On a headless C7 server (actually a pogoplug with the Redsleeve 7 distro), I have a usb attached backup drive (what other type of drives can you have on a pogoplug other than usb? :) ). I had reformated the partition as ext4: # parted /dev/sdb print Model: WD My Book 1230 (scsi) Disk /dev/sdb: 3001GB Sector size (logical/physical): 4096B/4096B Partition Table: msdos Disk Flags: Number Start

We have a system - it's C 7 - that a while back lost three drives of a large array. The other admin here replaced the failed drives, but never went through the MegaRAID replace series of commands. I've just brought it back up and put a new filesystem on it, but here's what's odd: if I do smartctl -a -d megaraid,x /dev/sda, where x=drive number, for all the other drives, I get

I had a drive failing on a server. I've replaced it. The old drive was /dev/sdb; the new one's /dev/sdd. The manpage and googling are failing me - anyone know how to tell smartd to stop trying to read /dev/sdb (which I've pulled, and is sitting here on my desk)? I don't need the garbage in the logs, and no, I can't just reboot the server, since it's a home directory

I am running software RAID1 on a somewhat critical server. Today I noticed one drive is giving errors. Good thing I had RAID. I planned on upgrading this server in next month or so. Just wandering if there was an easy way to fix this to avoid rushing the upgrade? Having a single drive is slowing down reads as well, I think. Thanks. Feb 7 15:28:28 server smartd[2980]: Device: /dev/sdb