similar to: ANOVA for glmnet

Hello - I am using glmnet to generate a model for multiple cohorts i. For each i, I run 5 separate models, each with a different x variable. I want to compare the fit statistic for each i and x combination. When I use auc, the output is in some cases is < .5 (.49). In addition, if I compare mean MSE (with upper and lower bounds) ... there is no difference across my various x variables, but

Hi all, I am using the glmnet R package to run LASSO with binary logistic regression. I have over 290 samples with outcome data (0 for alive, 1 for dead) and over 230 predictor variables. I currently using LASSO to reduce the number of predictor variables. I am using the cv.glmnet function to do 10-fold cross validation on a sequence of lambda values which I let glmnet determine. I then take

Dear List, I'm running simulations using the glmnet package. I need to use an 'automated' method for model selection at each iteration of the simulation. The cv.glmnet function in the same package is handy for that purpose. However, in my simulation I have p >> N, and in some cases the selected model from cv.glmet is essentially shrinking all coefficients to zero. In this case,

Dear R users: Recently, I learn to use penalized logistic regression. Two packages (penalized and glmnet) have the function of lasso. So I write these code. However, I got different results of coef. Can someone kindly explain. # lasso using penalized library(penalized) pena.fit2<-penalized(HRLNM,penalized=~CN+NoSus,lambda1=1,model="logistic",standardize=TRUE) pena.fit2

Hi all. Sorry for the long email. I have been trying to find someone local to work on this with me, without much luck. I went in to our local stats consulting service here, and the guy there told me that I already know more about model selection than he does. :-< He pointed me towards another professor that can perhaps help, but that prof is busy until mid-June, so I want to get as much

Hello I'm having trouble using lars and glmnet functions to predict on a new data set with different nrow then the original : for instance: ============= log.1 = glm(temp.data$TL~(.),temp.data,family = binomial,x=TRUE,y=TRUE) nrow(test.data) != nrow(temp.data # == TRUE Val.frame = model.frame(log.1,test.data) # returns a data frame with the variables needed to use log.1

Hi All,  I have been trying to use glmnet package to do LASSO linear regression. my x data is a matrix n_row by n_col and y is a vector of size n_row corresponding to the vector data. The number of n_col is much more larger than the number of n_row. I do the following: fits = glmnet(x, y, family="multinomial")I have been following this

Hi, I am attempting to evaluate the prediction error of a coxph model that was built after feature selection with glmnet. In the preprocessing stage I used na.omit (dataset) to remove NAs. I reconstructed all my factor variables into binary variables with dummies (using model.matrix) I then used glmnet lasso to fit a cox model and select the best performing features. Then I fit a coxph model

Dear all, If I am not mistaken, I think that I have found a bug in glmnet 1.7.1 (latest version) for multinomial when alpha=0. Here is the code > library(glmnet) Loading required package: Matrix Loading required package: lattice Loaded glmnet 1.7.1 > x=matrix(rnorm(40*500),40,500) > g4=sample(1:7,40,replace=TRUE) > fit=glmnet(x,g4,family="multinomial",alpha=0) >

Dear all, I am using glmnet (Coxnet) for building a Cox Model and to make actual prediction, i.e. to estimate the survival function S(t,Xn) for a new subject Xn. If I am not mistaken, glmnet (coxnet) returns beta, beta*X and exp(beta*X), which on its own cannot generate S(t,Xn). We miss baseline survival function So(t). Below is my code which takes beta coefficients from glmnet and creates coxph

Hi, I am trying to do multinomial regression using the glmnet package, but the following gives me an error (for no reason apparent to me): library(glmnet) cv.glmnet(x=matrix(c(1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6), nrow=6),y=as.factor(c(1,2,1,2,3,3)),family='multinomial',alpha=0.5, nfolds=2) The error i get is: Error in if (outlist$msg != "Unknown error") return(outlist) : argument is of

Hi, I am trying to do logistic regression for data of 104 patients, which have one outcome (yes or no) and 15 variables (9 categorical factors [yes or no] and 6 continuous variables). Number of yes outcome is 25. Twenty-five events and 15 variables mean events per variable is much less than 10. Therefore, I tried to analyze the data with penalized regression method. I would like please some of the

Hi, When using the glmnet() function of the package glmnet, A series of coefficients is returned for a list of descending lambda values. I am unable to locate anything in the documentation that explains HOW this choice of lambda series is made. (There is documentation about how to choose my own, but I want to understand how the authors are doing it) Any ideas? -- Noah Silverman UCLA

Dear Robert, The differences have to do with diffent scaling defaults. lrm by default standardizes the covariates to unit sd before applying penalization. penalized by default does not do any standardization, but if asked standardizes on unit second central moment. In your example: x = c(-2, -2, -2, -2, -1, -1, -1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3) z = c(0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1) You

Hello R-help list, I have a piece of code written by a grad student here at BU which will segfault when using one data set, but complete just fine using another. Both sets are just text files full of real numbers. It seems like a bug within R. It could be a bug within her data, but again, her data is just a bunch of floats, so her data could be triggering a bug within R. I have tried this

Hi, I am trying to use the glmnet package to do some simple feature selection. However, I would ideally like to be able to specify the number of features to return (the glmnet package, as far as I can tell, only allows specification of a regularization parameter, lambda, that in turn returns a model with a specific number of non-zero features). Is there a straightforward way of calculating the

The following R code using different packages gives the same results for a simple logistic regression without regularization, but different results with regularization. This may just be a matter of different scaling of the regularization parameters, but if anyone familiar with these packages has insight into why the results differ, I'd appreciate hearing about it. I'm new to

This update adds an intercept option (by popular request) - now one can fit a model without an intercept Glmnet is a package that fits the regularization path for a number of generalized linear models, with with "elastic net" regularization (tunable mixture of L1 and L2 penalties). Glmnet uses pathwise coordinate descent, and is very fast. The current list of models covered are:

This update adds an intercept option (by popular request) - now one can fit a model without an intercept Glmnet is a package that fits the regularization path for a number of generalized linear models, with with "elastic net" regularization (tunable mixture of L1 and L2 penalties). Glmnet uses pathwise coordinate descent, and is very fast. The current list of models covered are:

dear all, It appears that glmnet(), when "selecting" the covariates entering the model, skips from K covariates, say, to K+2 or K+3. Thus 2 or 3 variables are "added" at the same time and it is not possible to obtain a ranking of the covariates according to their importance in the model. On the other hand lars() "adds" the covariates one at a time. My question