similar to: ddns in samba4

centOs5.5/samba4/named here is a short guide setting it up to work. First of all do not install the bind package coming with centos 5.5!! Install needs for samba yum install libacl* gnutls* readline* python* gdb* autoconf* Named installation: Here is a description on what to do: http://jason.roysdon.net/2009/10/16/building-bind-9-6-on-rhel5-centos5-for-d nssec-nsec3-support/ The steps, yum

centOs5.5/samba4/named here is a short guide setting it up to work. First of all do not install the bind package coming with centos 5.5!! Install needs for samba yum install libacl* gnutls* readline* python* gdb* autoconf* Named installation: Here is a description on what to do: http://jason.roysdon.net/2009/10/16/building-bind-9-6-on-rhel5-centos5-for-d nssec-nsec3-support/ The steps, yum

When I setup Samba4 I already had a master and slave bind9 server so I copied the relevant dns information to my master server however I don't know how to make my existing server authoritative for the zone. It will send notifies to the slave and allow ddns updates but the slave shows this error: "slave-server named[1187]: client 1.1.1.1#22792: received notify for zone

Hi all, I've setup samba4 according to the samba4 wiki on centOS 5.4 in KVM. This went without any problems. I only had to install a higher version of bind to 9.6.x because Centos bind in repo will install version 9.3.x. I've used the Fedora12 source rpms for this to build bind 9.6.x on Centos 5.4. Then I configured bind according to the samba wiki

Hello: I would like to know what is wrong in my configuration. I can't see this server in network neighborhood. samba 3.5.6 joined to my active directory domain. [global] # message command = /bin/sh -c '/usr/bin/linpopup "%f" "%m" %s; rm %s' & security = ADS netbios name = dos realm = EPEPM.CUPET.CU password server = ad.epepm.cupet.cu workgroup =

Hi I have s4 with bind9 working fine. I see that it sets up a forward zone without using zone files (is that the dlz bit?) Is it possible to get it to produce a reverse zone? Thanks, Steve pp lcb

I followed the Howto http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO Using: -Samba4 alpha15 -Bind9.8.0 When I added an XP PC (192.168.123.244) to my domain I got this in syslog: May 11 12:04:18 samba4 named[10705]: client 192.168.123.244#1061: update 'mydomain.com/IN' denied May 11 12:04:18 samba4 named[10705]: tkey.c:486: ENSURE(result == (((1) << 16) + 28) || result == 0) failed,

I provisioned using the defaults. So now I'm using the internal DNS server. Since I've been having some issues with it (see Internal dns server stops forwarding) I would like to change to bind9, but now I don't have the files samba4 creates to use with it because I started using the internal dns server. How can I switch from internal dns server to bind9??? Cheers, Felix.

Recently I migrated to samba4 in my company. So far so good. debian 6 samba4.1.0pre1 bind9.9.1-P1 (working pretty well. it even updates the reverse zone and no problems at all with the forwarder) ntp-4.2.6p5 All services authenticating with samba4: mail (postfix + dovecot + squirrelmail), jabber (openfire), proxy (squid), even MS Sql server 2000, Net Support Manager and GFI Endpoint Security.

I have read in the samba http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_HOWTO that you can start samba just typing samba at the command promt, but what are the commands to stop and restart the service? thanks

Hi everyone. I have a Linux nsupdate client sending dns update requests via sssd. Just gone from 4.1.2 to 4.1.3. I've done this: http://linuxcostablanca.blogspot.com.es/2013/09/samba4-bind9dlz-stale-dns-records-with.html After which the forward zone update is working fine: 2014-01-10T12:32:35.376142+01:00 hh16 named[4963]: samba_dlz: starting transaction on zone hh3.site

I've just installed samba4 beta 7 with defaults and everything went OK. As I download bind9.9.1 tarball and compiled it I had to follow steve's advice: to declare we'll be using DLZ_DLOPEN_VERSION 2 in /samba-master/source4/dns_server/dlz_minimal.h /*#ifdef BIND_VERSION_9_8 #define DLZ_DLOPEN_VERSION 1 #else #define DLZ_DLOPEN_VERSION 2 #endif */ #define DLZ_DLOPEN_VERSION 2 I

Hello to everyone >From one day to another my internal dns server in samba4 stopped forwarding queries. It was resolving well my domain. I had to restart samba4 then it worked fine. Cheers, Felix.

centOs5.5/samba4/named here is a short guide setting it up to work. I added TSIG for bind-master amd bind-slave. Update to samba4 alpha13 added (installing git on CentOs 5.5). If you do this howto right now you will start with samba4 alpha13. You do not need the update section. But you need git for your installation because the rsync-thing is broken!!!!!! First of all do not install the bind

I have Samba4 running, and it had a win2k3 server joined to it. This is working great. I'd like to add another Ubuntu 12.04 server with samba4 beta5. What's the best join method? Do I provision the server as a member, then join using samba-tools domain join <domain> When I do it looks like it doesn't replicate the directory, just forwards? Should I provision as a DC with

Could you, please, give me some clue on how to configure dlz in Bind to work with Samba4? I installed samba4 from git check out from a week ago, then I provisioned it but DNS is not working. Best regards, Felix.

git checkout dd5868d when I try to provision I get the following: Populating ForestDnsZones partition bin/tdbbackup: /home/samba-master/bin/shared/private/libtdb.so: version `SAMBA_4.0.0ALPHA18_DEVELOPERBUILD' not found (required by bin/tdbbackup) Failed to setup database for BIND, AD based DNS cannot be used Traceback (most recent call last): File "./source4/setup/provision",

Hello. How can I have my windows clients synchronized with my Samba4 domain controller without using startup scripts?? I've played with Group Policies the same way they are configured when a w2k3 server is used and I couldn't make it this way. I also tried installing ntpd. I'm using Samba4 alpha 15 in a Debian Lenny Box. Any suggestions?? Thanks in advance. Regards, Felix.

Hello. I noticed that any domain user can delete the content of the shared folder sysvol in the domain controller from a windows client. How can I avoid that? Greetings, Felix

Reading Whatsnew.txt in samba I understand that If I use s3fs, as it is set by default in the provision step, I won't be able to modify GPOs later, right? So I have a couple of questions: - What's the advantage of using s3fs over ntvfs in new installations? - If I'm planning to deploy a new Domain, probably needing to change GPOs later, should I select ntvfs??? Best regards, Felix