similar to: integrate (error: evaluation of function gave a result of wrong length)

Hello R Help, I am trying solve an MLE convergence problem: I would like to estimate four parameters, p1, p2, mu1, mu2, which relate to the probabilities, P1, P2, P3, of a multinomial (trinomial) distribution. I am using the mle2() function and feeding it a time series dataset composed of four columns: time point, number of successes in category 1, number of successes in category 2, and

Hi, The code below is giving me this error message: Error in while (err > eps) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed In addition: Warning messages: 1: In dnbinom(x, size, prob, log) : NaNs produced 2: In dnbinom(x, size, prob, log) : NaNs produced I know from the help files that for dnbinom "Invalid size or prob will result in return value NaN, with a warning", but I am not able

Dear All, I may look ridiculous, but I am puzzled at the behavior of the nls with a fitting I am currently dealing with. My data are: x N 1 346.4102 145.428256 2 447.2136 169.530634 3 570.0877 144.081627 4 721.1103 106.363316 5 894.4272 130.390552 6 1264.9111 36.727069 7 1788.8544 52.848587 8 2449.4897 25.128742 9 3464.1016 7.531766 10 4472.1360 8.827367 11

Dear all: Assume I have 3 distributions, x1, x2, and x3. x1 ~ normal(mu1, sd1) x2 ~ normal(mu2, sd2) x3 ~ normal(mu3, sd3) y1 = x1 + x2 y2 = x1 + x3 Now that the data I can observed is only y1 and y2. It is easy to estimate (mu1+m2), (mu1+mu3), (sd1^2+sd2^2) and (sd1^2+sd3^2) by EM algorithm since y1 ~ normal(mu1+mu2, sqrt(sd1^2+sd2^2)) and y2 ~ normal(mu1+mu3, sqrt(sd1^2+sd3^2)) However, I want

Hi all. I was having some trouble with a for loop and I found the problem is the following. Does anyone have some idea why I got the following R result? Since mone is equal to 3, why mu1 only have 2 components? library(MASS) > p0 <- seq(0.1, 0.9,by=0.1) > m <- 10 > > > p0 <- p0[7] > > ## data generation > > mzero <- p0*m > mone <- m-mzero >

I continue to struggle with mixed models. The square zero version of the problem that I am trying to deal with is as follows: A number (240) of students are measured (tested; for reading comprehension) on 6 separate occasions. Initially (square zero) I want to treat the test time as a factor (with 6 levels). The students are of course ``random effects''. Later I want to look at

Hi, My name is Laura. I'm a PhD student at Queen's University Belfast and have just started learning R. I was wondering if somebody could help me to see where I am going wrong in my code for estimating the parameters [mu1, mu2, lambda1] of a 2-phase Coxian Distribution. cox2.lik<-function(theta, y){ mu1<-theta[1] mu2<-theta[2] lambda1<-theta[3]

Windows 7, R 2.12.1 Colleagues, I am trying to understand the n.for.2means function. The code below is a copy of the function (renamed to n.for.2means.js). I have inserted a single line of code towards the bottom of the function which uses the cat function to print the value of n1. You will note the value (preceded by stars) is printed as 1. The function (1) prints a lot of output without any

I am wanting to plot a 95% confidence band using segplot, yet I am wanting to have groups. For example if I have males and females, and then I have them in different races, I want the racial groups in different panels. I have this minor code, completely made up but gets at what I am wanting, 4 random samples and 4 samples of confidence, I know how to get A & B into one panel and C&D in to

Hi, I??m trying to use the Win2BUGS package from R and I have a similar problem that reurns with the message: Error in FUN(X[[1]], ...) : symbol print-name too long But, there is no stray ` character in the file ( Sugestions given by: Duncan Temple Lang <duncan> Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 07:31:08 -0700 ) The progam in R is: library(R2WinBUGS) library(rbugs) dat <-

hello: I have 3 data.frame objects. First df object: Of dim (149,31). Columns 2:31 are marked as T1..T14 and N1..N16. Name T1 T2 N1 T3 N2 N3 N4 T4 mu1 10 10 9 10 9 9 8 10 mu2 11 11 9 11 9 9 9 11 ... muN 12 12 9 11 9 9 8 12 Second df object: of Dim (50000,31). Columns 2:31 are maked as T1...T14 and N1..N16.

hello everybody I use the following code for my programming & it runs with the error as specified below.Any help that would disolve the error will be highly appreciated. Thanks in advance my code looks like this #### R programme for simulating the power of the two sample t test vs various #### non-parametric alternatives sim.size <- 200 sample.size <- 10 set.seed(231) mu1 <- 0 delta

Dear R users, I used to "OPTIM" to minimize the obj. function below. Even though I used the true parameter values as initial values, the results are not very good. How could I improve my results? Any suggestion will be greatly appreciated. Regards, Kathryn Lord #------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ x = c(0.35938587,

Dear R users, I used to "OPTIM" to minimize the obj. function below. Even though I used the true parameter values as initial values, the results are not very good. How could I improve my results? Any suggestion will be greatly appreciated. Regards, Kathryn Lord #------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ x = c(0.35938587,

I have problems reading a file with more than one row to carry out mathematical calculations I have a a file of the form mu1 mu2 alpha beta Wsigma sigmaA b r 25 15 .05 .05 22 3 .3 .5 30 20 .1 .2 22 .3 .3 .5 I intend to read one row , carry out the calculations and then the next row with which I intend to do the same calculations. I do the following.

Hi all, I'm trying to define and log-likelihood function to work with MLE. There will be parameters like mu_i, sigma_i, tau_i, ro_i, for i between 1 to 24. Instead of listing all the parameters, one by one in the function definition, is there a neat way to do it in R ? The example is as follows: ll<- function(mu1=-0.5,b=1.2,tau_1=0.5,sigma_1=0.5,ro_1=0.7) { if (tau1>0 &&

The following plot is a first approximation to what I need: *********************************** mu1 <- 0 mu2 <- 5 s <- 1 x <- seq(-2.5, 7.5, length = 41) y <- seq(-2.5, 2.5, length = 41) f <- function(x,y){ term1 <- 1/(2*pi*sqrt(s*s)) term2 <- -1/2 term3 <- (x - mu1)^2/s term4 <- (y - mu1)^2/s term5 <- (x - mu2)^2/s term1*(.5 * exp(term2*(term3 + term4)) + .5 *

Hi all, I appreciate the help this list has given me before. I have a question which has been perplexing me. I have been working on doing a Bayesian calculating inserting studies sequentially after using a non-informative prior to get a meta-analysis type result. I created a function using three iterations of this, my code is below. I insert prior mean and precision (I add precision manually

Dear R Help, I have two nested negative log-likelihood functions that I am optimizing with the spg function [BB package]. I would like to perform model selection on these two objective functions using AIC (and possibly anova() too). However, the spg() function returns a list and I need a fitted model object for AIC(), ICtab() [bbmle package], or anova(). How can I perform AIC-based model

Hi Folks, Given k RVs with MVN distribution N(mu,S) (S a kxk covariance matrix), let (w.l.o.g.) X1 denote the first r of them, and X2 the last (k-r). Likewise, let mu1 and mu2 denote their respective expectations. Then, of course, the expectation of X2 given X1=x1 is mu2 + S21*inv(S22)*(x1 - mu1) and the covariance matrix of X2 given X1=x2 is S22 - S21*inv(X11)*S12 where Sij is the