similar to: [PATCH 0/3] Fix guestfish edit command.

The first patch preserves file mode, UID, GID and SELinux context across edited files. The second patch adds a useful new command in guestfish ('llz') which shows SELinux context (like 'ls -laZ') that was useful when debugging this. Rich.

Hi, attached there is a prototype of patch for adding a new copy-attributes command. Such command would allow copy the attributes of a "file" to another, so for example in guestfish: copy-attributes foo bar permissions:true xattributes:false would only copy the permissions of foo to bar, not copying its extended attributes too. Just few notes: - my first daemon command, so

Make use of the new copy-attributes command to properly copy all file attributes from a file to the new version of it. --- builder/perl_edit.ml | 29 +--------------------------- edit/edit.c | 49 ++--------------------------------------------- fish/edit.c | 54 ++-------------------------------------------------- 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-) diff --git

Hi, this series does a couple of code reorganizations/refactoring in code used by tools: the windows path handling code, and the two types of file editing (using editor, and using perl expression). There's still a code duplication between the two variants of file editing, but it is just within a single source, and can be easily solved now (planning as next step). Pino Toscano (13): edit:

This patch set fixes a two year old bug in guestfish, namely that the 'glob' command does not expand /dev/* patterns. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635971 Rich.

These two patches make appliance building thread-safe. The first adds a test which easily demonstrates the problem. The second fixes the issue. For more information see Ian McLeod's analysis of the bug here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790528#c5 Rich.

This is the same as the previous patch, but the partition type is now chosen automatically from mbr or gpt, unless the user expresses a preference. https://gb.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2012-January/msg00136.html Rich.

Rather than me explaining over again what it does, I've included the man page below. Rich. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- virt-format(1) Virtualization Support virt-format(1) NAME virt-format - Erase and make a blank disk SYNOPSIS virt-format [--options] -a disk.img [-a disk.img ...] DESCRIPTION

Currently any api which takes a FileIn or FileOut parameter is implicitly cancellable. This change make cancellable an explicit flag in anticipation of it being added to other apis. --- generator/generator_actions.ml | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- generator/generator_checks.ml | 3 +- generator/generator_types.ml | 1 + 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

Memory leaks found by the tool--valgrind along with static reviewing. Based on Daivd''s branch ''integration-20130903''. Gui Hecheng (5): btrfs-progs:free local variable buf upon unsuccessful returns btrfs-progs:local variable memory freed btrfs-progs: missing tree-freeing statements added btrfs-progs:free the local list pending_list in btrfs_scan_one_dir

As suggested by rjones. --- src/generator.ml | 6 ++++-- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/generator.ml b/src/generator.ml index 94dc268..7ac4ac8 100755 --- a/src/generator.ml +++ b/src/generator.ml @@ -1756,7 +1756,8 @@ This uses the L<blockdev(8)> command."); [InitBasicFS, Always, TestOutput ( (* Pick a file from cwd which isn't

Hello everyone, I have a question about logging. I need to find out whether it is possible to see user id/session id inside logs or somewhere else. It is not passed in structured across the network, so where should I look to find out, which user (which session) is currently performing the actions?

Hi, I started creating a small class but I'm courious about how it is working. To create a instance of my class "Partri" I write this at Rgui: x <- new("Partri", name="Gilvan") and to change the slot "name" of this instance, I write: setName(x, newname="Justino") It is not working, because when I type "x" at Rgui, it shows

Fixing one bug uncovers the next one... To reproduce: llvm-ar rc ./libgcc.a libgcc/./_muldi3.o <and-lots-more-.o-files...> The result: C:\msys\1.0\home\llvm_home\install\bin\llvm-ar.exe: Can't move './libgcc.a-000003' to './libgcc.a-000002': Cannot create a file when that file already exists. So apparently, we're trying to move one file on top of another. The

A better way to solve this I think. Rich.

I can report that the computer renaming worked. As it turned out, only the cn was incorrect ... ldbsearch -H ldap://DC1 -UAdministrator 'CN=DT06' dn: CN=DT06,OU=Desktops,OU=Computers,DC=domain,DC=com objectClass: computer cn: DT06 operatingSystem: Windows 10 Pro displayName: WH23$ sAMAccountName: WH23$ ... so a simple LDAP rename worked ... ldbrename -H ldap://DC1 -UAdministrator

Hi, I've looked all over for a solution to this, but haven't had much look in specifying what I want to do with appropriate search terms. Thus I'm turning to R-help. In the process of trying to write a simple function to rename individual column names in a data frame, I ran into the following problem: When I rename the columns within my function, I can't seem to get it to

Thank you for your replies. I greatly appreciate the wealth of documentation on this subject and the time spent by the John Chambers and the R Core Team making object-orient programming in R a reality. I hope to be able to give code (not just bug reports) back to the R community as my projects advance. I hoping to generalize my as.character question to a real-life as.character / print method

Yep, you found another bug. Unlike Unix, Windows does not allow a file to be implicitly replaced via renaming. I'll fix it. Greg Pettyjohn wrote: > Fixing one bug uncovers the next one... > > To reproduce: > llvm-ar rc ./libgcc.a libgcc/./_muldi3.o <and-lots-more-.o-files...> > > The result: > C:\msys\1.0\home\llvm_home\install\bin\llvm-ar.exe: Can't move

Folks, Per a post to StackOverflow, I'm looking for an opinion on whether something should be documented: When adding a named item to a list, its guaranteed that the item will be added to the end of the list. SO post: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7599349/adding-named-item-to-list-guaranteed-to-append-to-end-of-list/7599610#7599610 This is my first email to r-devel, so I hope this is