similar to: How to properly build model matrices

Usually when using raw glmnet I let the implementation choose the lambdas. However when training via caret::train the lambda values are predetermined. Is there any way to have caret defer the lambda choices to caret::train and thus choose the optimal lambda dynamically? -- Yang Zhang http://yz.mit.edu/

I'm dealing with classification problems, and I'm trying to specify a custom scoring metric (recall at p, ROC, etc.) that depends on not just the class output but the probability estimates, so that caret::train can choose the optimal tuning parameters based on this metric. However, when I supply a trainControl summaryFunction, the data given to it contains only class predictions, so the

Hello all! I am once again analyzing patient survival data with chronic liver disease. The severity of the liver disease is given by a number which is continuously variable. I have referred to this number as "meld"--model for end stage liver disease--which is the result of a mathematical calculation on underlying laboratory values. So, for example, I can generate a Kaplan-Meier plot

I am used to packages like e1071 where you have a tune step and then pass your tunings to train. It seems with caret, tuning and training are both handled by train. I am using train and trainControl to find my hyper parameters like so: MyTrainControl=trainControl( method = "cv", number=5, returnResamp = "all", classProbs = TRUE ) rbfSVM <- train(label~., data =

The documentation for caret::train shows a list of parameters that one can tune for each method classification/regression method. For example, for the method randomForest one can tune mtry in the call to train. But the function call to train random forests in the original package has many other parameters, e.g. sampsize, maxnodes, etc. Is there **any** way to access these parameters using train

Hello, I'm training a set of data with Caret package using an elastic net (glmnet). Most of the time train works ok, but when the data set grows in size I get the following error: Error en { : task 1 failed - "arguments imply differing number of rows: 9, 10" and several warnings like this one: 1: In eval(expr, envir, enclos) : model fit failed for Resample01 My call to train

Hi, I'm using package "caret" to rank predictors using random forest model and draw predictors importance plot. I used below commands: rf.fit<-randomForest(x,y,ntree=500,importance=TRUE) ## "x" is matrix whose columns are predictors, "y" is a binary resonse vector ## Then I got the ranked predictors by ranking

Hei, I have two spatial datasets Sa and Sb, both with lat-lon coordinates and from same geographic area, but from different localities within the area (independent samples). Sa is biotoc data, Sb is some environmental parameter (fertility). I 'know' that Sb affects Sa, but wonder on which scale. I tried different interpolations by creating different grids of Sb (e.g. 20x20 and 100x100

Hi, I am having problems passing arguments to method="gbm" using the train() function. I would like to train gbm using the laplace distribution or the quantile distribution. here is the code I used and the error: gbm.test <- train(x.enet, y.matrix[,7], method="gbm", distribution=list(name="quantile",alpha=0.5), verbose=FALSE,

H2O va bien (muy bien) tanto en un ordenador sobremesa/portátil y sobre un clúster. En uno de sobremesa si tienes buena RAM y muchos cores, mejor. Y no tienes porqué usar Spark si no necesitas una solución tiempo real o "near real-time". H2O tiene otra solución para interaccionar con Spark (Sparkling Water). Incluso sobre un clúster, puedes usar "sparklyr" y

I'm using caret to assess classifier performance (and it's great!). However, I've found that my results differ between R2.* and R3.* - reported accuracies are reduced dramatically. I suspect that a code change to kernlab ksvm may be responsible (see version 5.16-24 here: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/caret/news.html). I get very different results between caret_5.15-61 +

Hi, I am trying to construct a svmpoly model using the "caret" package (please see code below). Using the same data, without changing any setting, I am just changing the seed value. Sometimes it constructs the model successfully, and sometimes I get an ?Error in indexes[[j]] : subscript out of bounds?. For example when I set seed to 357 following code produced result only for 8

Hi all, For some odd reason when running na?ve bayes, k-NN, etc., I get slightly different results (e.g., error rates, classification probabilities) from run to run even though I am using the same random seed. Nothing else (input-wise) is changing, but my results are somewhat different from run to run. The only randomness should be in the partitioning, and I have set the seed before this

I have never been able to get class probabilities to work and I am relatively new to using these tools, and I am looking for some insight as to what may be wrong. I am using caret with kernlab/ksvm. I will simplify my problem to a basic data set which produces the same problem. I have read the caret vignettes as well as documentation for ?train. I appreciate any direction you can give. I

In case you don't get an answer from someone more knowledgeable: 1. I don't know. 2. But it is possible that other packages that are loaded after set.seed() fool with the RNG. 3. So I would call set.seed just before you invoke each random number generation to be safe. Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking

Hello, We have a system which creates thousands of regression/classification models and in cases where we have only one input variable NaiveBayes throws an error. Maybe I am mistaken and I shouldn't expect to have a model with only one input variable. We use R version 2.6.0 (2007-10-03). We use caret (v4.1.19), but have tested similar code with klaR (v.0.5.8), because caret relies on

Hi all, I've been using a custom summary function to optimise regression model methods using the caret package. This has worked smoothly. I've been using the default bootstrapping resampling method. For bagging models (specifically randomForest in this case) caret can, in theory, uses the out-of-bag (oob) error estimate from the model instead of resampling, which (in theory) is largely

Hy, I got the following problem when trying to build a rpart model and using everything but LOOCV. Originally, I wanted to used k-fold partitioning, but every partitioning except LOOCV throws the following warning: ---- Warning message: In nominalTrainWorkflow(dat = trainData, info = trainInfo, method = method, : There were missing values in resampled performance measures. ----- Below are some

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 3:25 PM, Gary Black <gwblack001 at sbcglobal.net> wrote: (Sorry to be a bit slow responding.) You have not supplied a complete example, which would be good in this case because what you are suggesting could be a serious bug in R or a package. Serious journals require reproducibility these days. For example, JSS is very clear on this point. To your question >

On rare occasions I want to run a remote X command (like 'meld' to interactively merge changes in files) and normally 'ssh -Y remote_host' from a terminal in an NX/freenx window that is acting as my desktop to start and any X program subsequently started would open in a new window via X-forwarding - at least when the target is a 5.x host. I don't do it often enough to remember