similar to: predict.naiveBayes() bug in e1071 package

Hi, I have written a code in R for classifying microarray data using naive bayes, the code is given below: library(e1071) train<-read.table("Z:/Documents/train.txt",header=T); test<-read.table("Z:/Documents/test.txt",header=T); cl <- c(c(rep("ALL",10), rep("AML",10))); cl <- factor(cl) model <- NaiveBayes(train,cl);

Hi I'm trying to use RWeka to use a NaiveBayes Classifier(the Weka version). However it crashes whenever there is a NA in the class Gender Here is the.code I have with d2 as the data frame. The first call to NB doesn't make R crash but the second call does. NB <- make_Weka_classifier("weka/classifiers/bayes/NaiveBayesSimple") d2[,64]<-d2$Gender=="M"

I'm trying to fit a naive Bayes model and predict on a new data set using the functions naivebayes and predict (package = e1071). R version 2.5.1 on a Linux machine My data set looks like this. "class" is the response and k1 - k3 are the independent variables. All of them are factors. The response has 52 levels and k1 - k3 have 2-6 levels. I have about 9,300 independent variables

Hey, I just like to know how to extract details from the naiveBayes model (package e1071). I mean, for each possible value the model defines how much it influences the outcome. I want to sort those probabilities and show the values with the highest impact. How could I do that? PS: I tried using []'s to get to the model's internals, however, all I get is a "list" not a

Hallo! I would need a code for 10-fold cross validation for the classifiers Naive Bayes and svm (e1071) package. Has there already been done something like that? I tried to do it myself by applying the tune function first: library(e1071) tune.control <- tune.control(random =F, nrepeat=1, repeat.aggregate=min.,sampling=c("cross"),sampling.aggregate=mean, cross=10, best.model=T,

Hello, I will use the lca method in the e1071 package. But I get the following error: Error in pas[j, ] <- drop(exp(rep(1, nvar) %*% log(mp))) : number of items to replace is not a multiple of replacement length Does anybody know this error and knows what this means? Kind regards, Tryntsje

Hi, I run R 2.10.1 under ubuntu 10.04 LTS (Lucid Lynx) and klaR version 0.6-4. I compute a model over a 2 classes dataset (composed of 700 examples). To that aim, I use the function NaiveBayes provided in the package klaR. When I then use the prediction function : predict(my_model, new_data). I get the following warning : "In FUN(1:747[[747L]], ...) : Numerical 0 probability with

Hello, We have a system which creates thousands of regression/classification models and in cases where we have only one input variable NaiveBayes throws an error. Maybe I am mistaken and I shouldn't expect to have a model with only one input variable. We use R version 2.6.0 (2007-10-03). We use caret (v4.1.19), but have tested similar code with klaR (v.0.5.8), because caret relies on

I did this: nb <- naiveBayes(users, platform) pl <- predict(nb,users) nrow(users) ==> 314781 ncol(users) ==> 109 1. naiveBayes() was quite fast (~20 seconds), while predict() was slow (tens of minutes). why? 2. the predict results were completely off the mark (quite the opposite of the expected overfitting). suffice it to show the tables: pl: android blackberry ipad

Hi everyone, I have a question regarding a C function of the "stats" package in R. I tried to understand the ?loglin? basic function of the ?stats? package implemented in R. The implemented function itself runs without any problem (perhaps see sample). When I ran it line by line it stopped at the lines 23-24 of the loglin-function; (the following line): z <- .Call(C_LogLin,

Dear all, I tried a simple naive Bayes classification on an artificial dataset, but I have troubles getting the predict function to work with the type="class" specification. With type= "raw", it works perfectly, but with type="class" I get following error : Error in as.vector(x, mode) : invalid 'mode' argument Data : mixture.train is a training set with 100

Hi, Vince and I have noticed a problem with non-syntactic names in data frames and some modeling code (but not all modeling code). The following, while almost surely as documented could be a bit more helpful: m = matrix(rnorm(100), nc=10) colnames(m) = paste(1:10, letters[1:10], sep="_") d = data.frame(m, check.names=FALSE) f = formula(`1_a` ~ ., data=d) tm =

Hi! I'm using the Naive Bayes classifier provided by the e1071 package ( http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/e1071) and I've noticed that the predict function has a different behavior when the level set of the columns used for prediction is different from the ones used for fitting. From inspecting the predict.naiveBayes I came to the conclusion that this is due to the conversion of

Hey guys, I can't get my Naive Bayes model to predict. Forgive me if its simple... I've tried about everything and can't get it to work. Reproduceable code below. Thank you, Mike -- Michael Schumacher Manager Data & Analytics - ValueClick mike.schumacher@gmail.com * Functional Example Code from UCLA:

Hi, I tried to use naivebayes in package 'e1071'. when I use following parameter, only one predictor, there is an error. > m<- naiveBayes(iris[,1], iris[,5]) > table(predict(m, iris[,1]), iris[,5]) Error in log(sapply(attribs, function(v) { : Non-numeric argument to mathematical function However, when I use two predictors, there is not error any more. > m<-

Hi, I tried to use naivebayes in package 'e1071'. when I use following parameter, only one predictor, there is an error. > m <- naiveBayes(iris[,1], iris[,5]) > table(predict(m, iris[,1]), iris[,5]) Error in log(sapply(attribs, function(v) { : Non-numeric argument to mathematical function However, when I use two predictors, there is not error any more. > m <-

My data is 50,000 instances of about 200 predictor values, and for all 50,000 examples I have the actual class labels (binary). The data is quite unbalanced with about 10% or less of the examples having a positive outcome and the remainder, of course, negative. Nothing suggests the data has any order, and it doesn't appear to have any, so I've pulled the first 30,000 examples to use as

Hello, The e1071 function naiveBayes gives an error when called by do.call, although it doesn't give any error if I call it manually. Browse[1]> trainParams at classifier function (x, ...) UseMethod("naiveBayes") <environment: namespace:e1071> Browse[1]> trained <- do.call(trainParams at classifier, paramList) Error in names(dimnames(tables[[i]])) <- c(Yname,

hi there!! i am trying to implement the code of the e1071 package for naive bayes, but it doens't really work, any ideas?? i am very glad about any help!! i need a naive bayes with 10-fold cross validation: code: library(e1071) model <- naiveBayes(code ~ ., mydata) tune.control <- tune.control(random = FALSE, nrepeat = 1, repeat.aggregate = min, sampling = c("cross"),

Hi all, For some odd reason when running na?ve bayes, k-NN, etc., I get slightly different results (e.g., error rates, classification probabilities) from run to run even though I am using the same random seed. Nothing else (input-wise) is changing, but my results are somewhat different from run to run. The only randomness should be in the partitioning, and I have set the seed before this