similar to: Would difference in size (and content) of a file on replicated bricks be healed?

I've got configuration which in simple includes combination of afrs and unify - servers exports n[1-3]-brick[12] and n[1-3]-ns and client got cluster configuration: volume afr-ns type cluster/afr subvolumes n1-ns n2-ns n3-ns option data-self-heal on option metadata-self-heal on option entry-self-heal on end-volume volume afr1 type cluster/afr subvolumes n1-brick2

Hi, I got the same problem as Juergen, My volume is a simple replicated volume with 2 host and GlusterFS 3.2.0 Volume Name: poolsave Type: Replicate Status: Started Number of Bricks: 2 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: ylal2950:/soft/gluster-data Brick2: ylal2960:/soft/gluster-data Options Reconfigured: diagnostics.brick-log-level: DEBUG network.ping-timeout: 20 performance.cache-size: 512MB

2017-07-20 11:34 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com>: > > Could you check if the self-heal daemon on all nodes is connected to the 3 > bricks? You will need to check the glustershd.log for that. > If it is not connected, try restarting the shd using `gluster volume start > engine force`, then launch the heal command like you did earlier and see if > heals

To test gluster's behavior under heavy load, I'm currently doing this on two machines sharing a common /mnt/gfs gluster mount: ssh bal-6.example.com apt-get install dbench && dbench 6 -t 60 -D /mnt/gfs ssh bal-7.example.com apt-get install dbench && dbench 6 -t 60 -D /mnt/gfs One of the processes usually dies pretty quickly like this: [608] open

Hi all, I have 4 glusterd servers running a single glusterfs volume. The volume was created using the gluster command line, with no changes from default. The same machines all mount the volume using the native glusterfs client: [root at localhost ~]# gluster volume create datastore replica 2 transport tcp 192.168.253.1:/glusterfs/primary 192.168.253.3:/glusterfs/secondary

Hi All. Hoping you can help me with a healing problem. I have one file which didn't self heal. it looks to be a problem with a directory in the path as one node says it's dirty. I have a replica volume with arbiter This is what the 3 nodes say. One brick on each Node1 getfattr -d -m . -e hex /path/to/dir | grep afr getfattr: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names

Le Jeudi, Novembre 16, 2017 13:07 CET, Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com> a ?crit: > On 11/16/2017 12:54 PM, Daniel Berteaud wrote: > > Any way in this situation to check which file will be healed from > > which brick before reconnecting ? Using some getfattr tricks ? > Yes, there are afr xattrs that determine the heal direction for each > file. The good copy

Hi, I'm running glusterFS 3.3.1 on Centos 6.4. ? Gluster volume status Status of volume: glustervol Gluster process Port Online Pid ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Brick KWTOCUATGS001:/mnt/cloudbrick 24009 Y 20031 Brick KWTOCUATGS002:/mnt/cloudbrick

Thanks Ravi for your answer. Stupid question but how do I delete the trusted.afr xattrs on this brick? And when you say "this brick", do you mean the brick on the arbitrer node (node 3 in my case)? ?? ??????? Original Message ??????? On April 9, 2018 1:24 PM, Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com> wrote: > ?? > > On 04/09/2018 04:36 PM, mabi wrote: > > >

Hello, Last Friday I upgraded my GlusterFS 3.10.7 3-way replica (with arbitrer) cluster to 3.12.7 and this morning I got a warning that 9 files on one of my volumes are not synced. Ineeded checking that volume with a "volume heal info" shows that the third node (the arbitrer node) has 9 files to be healed but are not being healed automatically. All nodes were always online and there

On 04/09/2018 05:09 PM, mabi wrote: > Thanks Ravi for your answer. > > Stupid question but how do I delete the trusted.afr xattrs on this brick? > > And when you say "this brick", do you mean the brick on the arbitrer node (node 3 in my case)? Sorry I should have been clearer. Yes the brick on the 3rd node. `setfattr -x trusted.afr.myvol-private-client-0

As I was suggested in the past by this mailing list a now ran a stat and getfattr on one of the problematic files on all nodes and at the end a stat on the fuse mount directly. The output is below: NODE1: STAT: File: ?/data/myvol-private/brick/dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/dir5/dir6/dir7/dir8/dir9/dir10/dir11/dir12_Archiv/azipfiledir.zip/OC_DEFAULT_MODULE/problematicfile? Size: 0 Blocks: 38

Again thanks that worked and I have now no more unsynched files. You mentioned that this bug has been fixed in 3.13, would it be possible to backport it to 3.12? I am asking because 3.13 is not a long-term release and as such I would not like to have to upgrade to 3.13. ??????? Original Message ??????? On April 9, 2018 1:46 PM, Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com> wrote: > ??

I've touched the directory one level above the directory with the I\O issue as the one above that is the one showing as dirty. It hasn't healed. Should the self heal daemon automatically kick in here? Is there anything else I can do? Thanks David On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 at 07:03, Strahil Nikolov <hunter86_bg at yahoo.com> wrote: > You can always mount it locally on any of the

On 04/09/2018 04:36 PM, mabi wrote: > As I was suggested in the past by this mailing list a now ran a stat and getfattr on one of the problematic files on all nodes and at the end a stat on the fuse mount directly. The output is below: > > NODE1: > > STAT: > File:

Here would be also the corresponding log entries on a gluster node brick log file: [2018-04-09 06:58:47.363536] W [MSGID: 113093] [posix-gfid-path.c:84:posix_remove_gfid2path_xattr] 0-myvol-private-posix: removing gfid2path xattr failed on /data/myvol-private/brick/.glusterfs/12/67/126759f6-8364-453c-9a9c-d9ed39198b7a: key = trusted.gfid2path.2529bb66b56be110 [No data available] [2018-04-09

On 07/20/2017 03:42 PM, yayo (j) wrote: > > 2017-07-20 11:34 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com > <mailto:ravishankar at redhat.com>>: > > > Could you check if the self-heal daemon on all nodes is connected > to the 3 bricks? You will need to check the glustershd.log for that. > If it is not connected, try restarting the shd using

Currently it would seem that AFR will simply copy everything to every brick in the AFR. If I did something like ... volume afr-example type cluster/afr subvolumes brick1 brick2 brick3 brick4 brick5 brick6 brick7 brick8 end-volume I would wind up with 8 copies of every file. Clearly, this is too many. What I would rather have is maybe 3 copies of each file distributed randomly across

I am seeing this crashing happening, I am working on the self healing errors as well, not sure if the two are related. I would appreciate any direction on trying to resolve the issue, I have clients dropping connection daily. [2013-10-26 15:35:46.935903] E [afr-self-heal-common.c:2160:afr_self_heal_completion_cbk] 0-ENTV04EP-replicate-9: background meta-data self-heal failed on / [2013-10-26

Hi, After running rm -rf on a directory, the files under it got deleted, but the directory was not deleted and was showing stale file handle error. After 18 minutes, I'm able to delete the directory. So could anyone help me in knowing what could have happened or when in general I get such errors. The following is NFS log: [2017-12-21 13:56:01.592256] I [MSGID: 108019]