similar to: Samba4 user mapping into filesystem

Hello, for reasons I want to know the return value of TYPEOF(R_NilValue), I expect it to be NILSXP, but I can't find this documented anywhere. Ideally, I'd like to see the source definition of R_NilValue, but after fair bit of searching I cannot find an obviously location for this. Would someone please point me in the right direction? thanks -- CRICOS provider code 00123M

Hi all, I'm trying to resize a journal on my root filesystem. This is Ext3, kernel 2.4.19, latest e2fsprogs + htree patch. I've remounted my root filesystem as ext2, but still when I 'tune2fs -O ^has_journal' I get ---- The has_journal flag may only be cleared when the filesystem is unmounted or mounted read-only. ---- So, how can I increase the size of the journal? I

Not in my testing especially about the time of 6.4. On Apr 22, 2016 5:16 PM, "Gordon Messmer" <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote: > On 04/22/2016 01:33 AM, Rob Townley wrote: > >> tune2fs against a LVM (albeit formatted with ext4) is not the same as >> tune2fs against ext4. >> > > tune2fs operates on the content of a block device. A logical volume

tune2fs against a LVM (albeit formatted with ext4) is not the same as tune2fs against ext4. Could this possibly be a machine where uptime has outlived its usefulness? On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:02 PM, Chris Murphy <lists at colorremedies.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Matt Garman <matthew.garman at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > ># rpm -qf `which

I am using a Redhat 7.1 system with the Kernel 2.4.10. I have the two partitions on the system: /dev/hda1 = / /dev/hb5 = /extra I was able to create the journal for both filesystems using the tune2fs -j command. I have also updated my "fstab" file to reflect "ext3" When I try to reboot the machine without unmounting the filesystems. It still shows that I have not cleanly

I have an ext4 filesystem for which I'm trying to use "tune2fs -l". Here is the listing of the filesystem from the "mount" command: # mount | grep share /dev/mapper/VolGroup_Share-LogVol_Share on /share type ext4 (rw,noatime,nodiratime,usrjquota=aquota.user,jqfmt=vfsv0,data=writeback,nobh,barrier=0) When I try to run "tune2fs" on it, I get the following error:

Dear Mailinglist, this morning I had a very strange problem with my SuSE Groupware-Server SLOX 4.1. The webmail-access was very slow and even with thunderbird the access to my mailboxes was not okay. I rebooted the whole system, but the problem still was there. I thought, this may be a problem with cyrusd, but I realized, that the error was somewhere deeper in the system, maybe in the

Hello everyone, Ok, I admit it - I'm an idiot. But it seemed the right thing to do at the time.... I'm running RH 6.2 with a 2.2.19ext3 (ext3 0.0.7). I wanted to try out the new 2.4 kernel line, so I upgraded modutils, gcc and few other things.. Compiled the kernel (did NOT patch it to ext3) and installed it and rebooted. Well, it didn't understand ext3 fs.. Ok... Boot back into

On Sat, April 30, 2016 8:54 am, William Warren wrote: > uptime=insecurity. This sounds like MS Windows admin's statement. Are there any Unix admins still left around who remember systems with kernel that doesn't need [security] patching for few years? And libc that does not need security patches often. I almost said glibc, but on those Unixes it was libc; glibc, however, wasn't

Hi! I'm justing in the process of setting up a new fileserver for our company. I'm installing CentOS 5.3 (64 bit) on it. One of the "problems" with it is that it has a 3.5TB filesystem for the user data which I formatted during setup as an ext3. Now my experience with our current fileserver is that a 0.5TB ext3 filesystem needs approx half an hour to complete (and kicks in

Peter Kjellstr?m wrote: > On Monday 23 January 2006 16:46, Plant, Dean wrote: >> I need to downgrade a system from Centos x4.2 to v3.6 (x86) due to >> performance problems with Arkeia Network Backup and AIT-4 tape >> drives. The backup database is stored on a v4.2 created ext3 >> partition. When accessing this partition after the downgrade, Centos >> complains on

I just came back after being out for the evening. Apparently there was a power failure long enough to discharge the UPS completely on my Linux box. After powering back up, I received notice that the / filesystem needed "manual fsck"ing. I booted off CD and attempted to fsck. Unfortunately, everything I've tried has proved futile and I'm _desperate_ for some help. I've

All, I suspect this is OT, or a solution may have been posted. Either way, I beg your indulgence. While I've used Samba for quite a few years, I recently took a stab at using it in an organization I volunteer at to create a PDC, in conjunction with openldap. The good news is it works, for the most part, after some set-up struggles. I have a couple of remaining issues, but let me take them

i posted on rhel list about proper creating of 6tb ext3 filesystem and tuning here.......http://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2006-November/msg00239.html i am reading lots of ext3 links like...... http://www.redhat.com/support/wpapers/redhat/ext3/ http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2005-September/052533.html http://batleth.sapienti-sat.org/projects/FAQs/ext3-faq.html ............but

All -- I'm curious is if it safe or even wise to run the following command on a mounted filesystem, namely root (/)? tune2fs -j /dev/hda1 What about if someone goes into single user mode and runs this first? mount -o remount,ro / And then to enable it, runs this? mount -t ext2 -o remount,rw / I assume it is not safe to do so, but one user in my LUG assumes otherwise. Just curious,

Hi List, I want to use Active Directory for my samba users passwords and /etc/group for storing group membership. /etc/nsswitch.conf looks like: group: file Problem: the tests i ran show that the samba server does not know about group membership (deleting file from other user belonging to the same group fails). The same test works as expectet when winbindd is switched off. What do i have to

Hi, I just installed Redhat AS 2.1 on a a new machine with tons of RAID5 space. During the install, I created the partition/filesystem /largedisk with 550784264 blocks. After everything is installed and mounted, I get the following in a df: /dev/sda8 550784264 32828 522773144 1% /largedisk The avail + used != total, not even close. I realize that the 32828 is probably the

Let me preface this by saying "Yes, I know *nix filesystems don't need to worry about fragmentation". That said, is there a way to check the overall level of fragmentation of a live ext3 filesystem? I know about filefrag, but that's for specific files. And I think e2fsck tells you, but only if you take the filesystem offline for the scan. Is there anything that will give

Dear all, Could you please help me how to get the output as I described in the following example? x<-c(543, 543, 543, 543, 551 , 551 ,1128 ,1197, 1197) diff<-x-lag(x) diff [1] NA 0 0 0 8 0 577 69 0 How to index the occasions in x repeatedly if the diff<15? if diff>=15, it will give a new index. I want the output be like y. y<-c(1,1,1,1,1,1,2,3,3) Thank you so

Dear all, Could you please help me how to get the output as I described in the following example? x<-c(543, 543, 543, 543, 551 , 551 ,1128 ,1197, 1197) diff<-x-lag(x) diff [1] NA 0 0 0 8 0 577 69 0 How to index the occasions in x repeatedly if the diff<15? if diff>=15, it will give a new index. I want the output be like y. y<-c(1,1,1,1,1,1,2,3,3) Thank you so