Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "virt-install: "ERROR Host does not support any virtualization options""
2017 May 23
2
Odd Virsh Capabilities response
Tried to migrate a few VMs from existing system to an older host that we
threw in the rack to facilitate some server reshuffling.
Migration complained about lack of capabilities (which I expected its an
older server) but when I looked at what I should throw into the xml file
I got a core2duo when it should have been at least Penryn or something
(Xeon E5345)
Of course the VMs work fine with
2012 Apr 18
1
Problems using latest qemu-kvm and latest libvirt ( hvm missing )
Hi all
I have faced this issue already and the solution was to go back to a
old version of qemu-kvm and/or libvirt and things start falling into
place but this time I would want to solve this.
I have used these versions as per the o/p of the commands below. To
jumpstart a new machine which is libvirt capable, it always is a hastle
to find out which of the version combination of
2017 May 23
0
Re: Odd Virsh Capabilities response
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 05:03:21PM -0700, W Kern wrote:
>Tried to migrate a few VMs from existing system to an older host that we
>threw in the rack to facilitate some server reshuffling.
>
>Migration complained about lack of capabilities (which I expected its an
>older server) but when I looked at what I should throw into the xml file
>I got a core2duo when it should have been
2014 Jul 10
2
How to config qga to support dompmsuspend
Hi,
I tried to run domsuspend command on my PowerPC board but failed.
# virsh dompmsuspend sdk --target mem
error: Domain sdk could not be suspended
error: argument unsupported: QEMU guest agent is not configured
It seemed that support suspend-to-mem only from capabilities.
# virsh capabilities
<capabilities>
<host>
2014 Jun 02
0
numa support question on centos 6.5
Hi, All
The vm can't start when using numa based on centos 6.5(kernel:
kernel-2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.x86_64,
qemu-kvm: qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.8.x86_64). My numa setting in vm
xml is the following:
--------------------
<numatune>
<memory mode='strict' nodeset='1'/>
</numatune>
--------------------
When 'nodeset' sets '0', the
2013 Jan 23
1
VMs fail to start with NUMA configuration
I am using libvirt 0.10.2.2 and qemu-kvm 1.2.2 (qemu-kvm 1.2.0 + qemu
1.2.2 applied on top plus a number of stability patches). Having issue
where my VMs fail to start with the following message:
kvm_init_vcpu failed: Cannot allocate memory
Following the instructions at
http://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsNUMATuning I've added the
following to my VCPU configuration:
<vcpu
2014 Jan 13
2
how to detect if qemu supports live disk snapshot
Hi everyone,
Using the QEMU hypervisor, when a live disk snapshot is requested through libvirt,
the request can fail if the underyling qemu binary lacks the snapshotting
support.
In python, we have something like
libvirtError: Operation not supported: live disk snapshot not supported with this QEMU binary
I'd like to detect ahead of time if the underlying QEMU can or cannot do
2012 Mar 14
6
Host does not support virtualization type 'xen'
Hello Community,
I successfully installed and run xen (xm list and xm info can output
appropriately).
However, while I was installing domU image by using virt-install -p at
domU OS. I encountered an
error information" Host does not support virtualization type ''xen'' ".
I built xen from source. Some of my friends have the same issue, but if
they use pre-build xen, the
2008 Jun 08
8
Windows GPLPV under OpenSolaris not working
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 3:28 PM, James Harper <james.harper@bendigoit.com.au>
wrote:
> I''ve just uploaded 0.9.8 to http://www.meadowcourt.org/downloads
>
> As a reminder, the wiki page is
> http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenWindowsGplPv
>
> This release fixes a bug which could be hit under high disk load (high
> number of outstanding requests with fragmented
2020 May 10
0
Nested Virtualization on Google Cloud.
I am using nested virtualization on a Google Cloud Compute instance. Things
are generally working fine with libvirt using qemu+kvm, however I observed
that <cpu mode='host-model'> is not exposing avx and avx2 instruction set
to the guest Linux instance. Google Cloud platform claims the CPU model of
the host compute instance is Broadwell, however libvirt capabilities maps
it to
2012 Oct 24
3
KVM + virsh nodeinfo + CentOS 6.3
Hi,
Please let me know in case I am posting my question to the wrong forum.
I apologize if that is the case!
Here is my question:
We run CentOS 6.3 on a server with dual Xeon CPU's. Our "dual blade"
server uses this motherboard:
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon/C600/X9DRT-HF.cfm
We have two of these CPUs installed and working:
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @
2014 Jul 09
5
[LLVMdev] [PATCH][REQUEST] Could someone submit this CSR Kalimba definitions patch please?
Hello LLVMdev!!
Yesterday I posted a patch request to the llvm-commits list requesting
that someone could apply a patch to Triple.h and Triple.cpp for me. I
didn't get any response so I wondered whether I should have posted to
this list instead.
My story is as follows: we are trying to get lldb/llvm support for CSRs
range of Kalimba DSPs. Eventually we are planning to hire someone to
2012 Aug 17
3
[LLVMdev] RFC: MCJIT enhancements
On Aug 17, 2012, at 2:50 AM, Paweł Bylica <pawel.bylica at ibs.org.pl> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Kaylor, Andrew <andrew.kaylor at intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Paweł,
>
>
>
> Thanks for continuing this discussion.
>
>
>
> I like the simplicity of your suggestion. My only concern involves the ambiguity of what is meant by “environment”.
2012 Aug 16
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: MCJIT enhancements
Hi Paweł,
Thanks for continuing this discussion.
I like the simplicity of your suggestion. My only concern involves the ambiguity of what is meant by “environment”. Presently there are functions in the llvm::Triple class to access the environment as an enumeration of a fixed set of values. It seems that some non-enumerated values are already in use, but introducing possible combinations of
2012 Aug 17
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: MCJIT enhancements
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Kaylor, Andrew <andrew.kaylor at intel.com>wrote:
> Hi Paweł,****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks for continuing this discussion.****
>
> ** **
>
> I like the simplicity of your suggestion. My only concern involves the
> ambiguity of what is meant by “environment”. Presently there are functions
> in the llvm::Triple class to access
2012 Sep 05
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: MCJIT enhancements
ping
From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Kaylor, Andrew
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 11:10 AM
To: Jim Grosbach; Pawel Bylica; Chris Lattner
Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu (LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu)
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] RFC: MCJIT enhancements
Has anything more happened with this?
-Andy
From: Jim Grosbach [mailto:grosbach at apple.com]
Sent:
2012 Aug 28
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: MCJIT enhancements
Has anything more happened with this?
-Andy
From: Jim Grosbach [mailto:grosbach at apple.com]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 7:51 AM
To: Paweł Bylica; Chris Lattner
Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu (LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu); Kaylor, Andrew
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] RFC: MCJIT enhancements
On Aug 17, 2012, at 2:50 AM, Paweł Bylica <pawel.bylica at ibs.org.pl<mailto:pawel.bylica at ibs.org.pl>>
2012 Sep 05
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: MCJIT enhancements
Chris, are you OK with the below changes to the Triple?
-Jim
On Sep 4, 2012, at 5:21 PM, "Kaylor, Andrew" <andrew.kaylor at intel.com> wrote:
> ping
>
> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Kaylor, Andrew
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 11:10 AM
> To: Jim Grosbach; Pawel Bylica; Chris Lattner
> Cc: llvmdev
2012 Sep 07
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: MCJIT enhancements
On Sep 4, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote:
> Chris, are you OK with the below changes to the Triple?
If at all possible, I'd like to keep the triple changes separate (separate patch series and separate discussion) from the other MCJIT changes. How dependent are the MCJIT improvements on the Triple changes?
As you've noticed, Triple is not a
2012 Aug 16
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: MCJIT enhancements
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Kaylor, Andrew <andrew.kaylor at intel.com>wrote:
>
> -------------------------------****
>
> ELF Support on Windows****
>
> -------------------------------****
>
> ****
>
> There are various reasons that it would be nice to be able to support
> generation of ELF objects on Windows through the MCJIT interface, one of
>