similar to: incomplete final line found on <name of my sourced function file>

Hi All, I seem to be having a few troubles with aggregating data back onto the the dataframe, I want to take the max value of a user, and then apply this max value back against all id's that match (i.e a one to many matching) Can anyone offer any advice? is there a better way of doing this? Dummy data and code are listed below:- dataset is called Mcookie user_id c_we_conversion 1

I'm trying to get the following section of code to work, I think the problem is being caused by the assignment of data to the lm function not evaluating to "train" in the parent environment but I can't seem to figure out how to do this. fitmodel <- function(trial,data) { wrap.lm <- function(formula,data,...) { cat("in wrap lm",NROW(data),"\n");

Hello, I am having trouble understanding how R is coercing between matrices and lists in the following example. I have an aggregate behavior I like: aggregate(a[,"num"],by=list(product=a[,"product"],region=a[,"region"]), sum) Now in reality I have more columns than just product and region, and need to pick different combinations. So I want to abstract this into a

Hi all, I put up an exhaustive model to use R's "step" function: ------------------------ mygam=gam(col1 ~ 1 + col2 + col3 + col4 + col2 ^ 2 + col3 ^ 2 + col4 ^ 2 + col2 ^ 3 + col3 ^ 3 + col4 ^ 3 + s(col2, 1) + s(col3, 1) + s(col4, 1) + s(col2, 2) + s(col3, 2) + s(col4, 2) + s(col2, 3) + s(col3, 3) + s(col4, 3) + s(col2, 4) + s(col3, 4) + s(col4, 4) + s(col2, 5) + s(col3,

I have 2 dataframes. "mydata" contains numerical data. "mybys" contains information on the "group" each row of the data is in. I wish to aggregate each column in mydata using the corresponding column in mybys. Please see the example below. What is a more elegant or "better" way to accomplish this task? Thanks! mydata =

All, Given a data frame and a list containing factor definitions for certain columns, how can I apply those definitions from the list, rather than doing it the standard way, as noted below. I'm lost in the world of do.call, assign, paste, and can't find my way through. For example: #set up df y <- data.frame(colOne = c(1,2,3), colTwo =

Hi All, I am not sure if this is a relevant platform to ask but I have tried other more related platforms and haven't had any luck so i thought i would try my luck here. Basically I want to generate a selectInput widget with a conditional under renderUI in Shiny. The number of widgets generated will depend on the number of variables a user selects. Try as I may I have not been able to get

Hi Thomas, Thanks for your kind response! Please review my backport for hs25, thanks a lot! diff -r 3544d85cfe11 src/share/vm/opto/lcm.cpp --- a/src/share/vm/opto/lcm.cpp Thu Jul 19 10:00:36 2018 +0100 +++ b/src/share/vm/opto/lcm.cpp Fri Jul 20 10:06:37 2018 +0800 @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ // Check whether val is not-null-decoded compressed oop, // i.e. will grab into the base of the heap

Hi Thomas, Looks good. Your changes in loopPredicate.cpp does not match original changes - they miss iff->is_RangeCheck() check [1]. But in JDK8 we did not have specialized RangeCheckNode class in C2. Suggested fix should be fine fro jdk 8u. Reviewed. Please, when sending RFA ( approval request) use original 8174050 bug id. Thanks, Vladimir [1]

Hello all, I have files (see attached) which are created daily. I want to load about a weeks worth of them (7 daily files) and plot a weeks worth of one variable together. So one variable name is delta_D_H. I would like to plot this variable from all 7 days on one plot. I'm having trouble figure out how to do this. I've loaded them all up using this time=Sys.time() t1<-

Hi Alex, Thanks for the feedback. My first thought was that introducing the new pseudo var @EXPR is a nice way to generalize that syntax beyond @LINE since it would also evaluate to an arithmetic value. On the other hand there is a small inconsistency because @LINE evaluates to a value which can be part of an expression while @EXPR is an expression, and so the @ syntax as a whole becomes defined

Hi HotSpot and LLVM developers, I am building OpenJDK8[1] with LLVM toolchain[2] for mips64el, it failed to build: /home/loongson/jdk8-mips/hotspot/src/share/vm/opto/lcm.cpp:52:35: error: ordered comparison between pointer and zero ('address' (aka 'unsigned char *') and 'int') if (Universe::narrow_oop_base() > 0) { // Implies UseCompressedOops.

Hi Alexander, Please forgive me if I'm missing the obvious but I do not see how the order helps allowing a comma in the expression. It seems to me that what would allow it is to make FMTSPEC mandatory or at least the comma to separate it (ie. [[#,EXPR]] for the default format specifier). In any case comma in a function-call like expression can be distinguished from comma for the format

Hi Alex, On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 at 11:53, Alexander Richardson <arichardson.kde at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 at 10:28 Thomas Preudhomme <thomas.preudhomme at linaro.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Alexander, >> >> Please forgive me if I'm missing the obvious but I do not see how the >> order helps allowing a comma in the expression. It seems

I can certainly envision a use case for a [BASE + LENGTH + 4] computation to verify the address of a next-thingy. Comes up in DWARF dumps all the time. --paulr From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of James Henderson via llvm-dev Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2018 11:53 AM To: Thomas Preudhomme Cc: llvm-dev Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Syntax for FileCheck numeric variables

To be clear, I do not intend to add support for hex specifier in the current patch, I just want to make sure the syntax we choose is going to allow it later. My immediate use case is decimal integer and I intend to write the code so that it's easy to extend to more type of numeric variables and expressions later. This way we'll only add specifier that are actually required by actual

Hi James, Yes I think you summary proposal is a good one though I disagree with the colon being optional because there is ambiguity with looking for the value of VAR5 in the %x format. If anything, [[# %x, VAR5]] is equivalent to [[#:%x, VAR5]] or ([[#:%x = VAR5]] with your proposal. My other suggestion would be to use == rather than = since = could be confused with assignment. Note that