similar to: Director to keep redirecting users to the same server even after all sessions closed?

Hi, we're running dovecot 1.1.2 (centos5 32-bit rpm from atrpms) havn't had any real issues with it, but today it looks like an index has become badly corrupted. We're seeing this in the logs every time we log in to a particular account: 2008-09-10T11:56:07+01:00 mail8 dovecot: Panic: IMAP(xxx): Trying to allocate 2273345672 bytes 2008-09-10T11:56:07+01:00 mail8 dovecot: IMAP(xxx):

Hi, About a week ago I upgraded our reasonably heavily loaded mail servers from a pretty recent courier version to dovecot-1.1rc10. IMAP performance on dovecot is amazing, however POP3 performance is worse than courier :-( I have uploaded some munin graphs taken today to http://linweb.atlas.pipex.net/dovecot/; the dovecot server is handling about 2000 pop logins/sec and 300 imap sessions (but

Dear All, I'm having an intermittent problem, with dovecot slowing to a crawl. Restarting dovecot fixes the problem. Looking at the maillog, I see loads of these errors.... dovecot: pipe() failed: Too many open files dovecot: Temporary failure in creating login processes, slowing down for now dovecot: Created login processes successfully, unstalling looking at the processes, I can see

My existing pop3/imap environment is courier imap + vpopmail + qmail with MySQL backend. I'm looking at migrating this to Dovecot. Currently I have multiple instances of Courier bound to different loopback IPs (the IPs correspond with the virtual IPs on a server load balancer). When a user authenticates they don't have to specify a domain - if they don't, Courier will use a

Hi there, I've been seeing this error in our logs quite frequently on our nfs storage (v3): 2008-11-10T13:24:26+00:00 mail8 dovecot: IMAP(XXX at YYY.com): nfs_flush_fcntl: fcntl(/var/spool/mail/XXX/Maildir/dovecot.index.cache, F_RDLCK) failed: No locks available Which is because we don't run lockd on our servers. Why is dovecot trying to use fcntl() ? I explicitly set it to use dotlocks

Hi, often I run into the situation where a dovecot server goes down for maintenance, and all users get concentrated in the remaining dovecot server (considering I have 2 dovecot servers only). When that dovecot server comes back online, director server will send new users to it, but the dovecot server that was up all the time will still have tons of clients mapped to it. I suggest the director

Following on from this thread: http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2010-September/052704.html <https://owa2010.webfusion.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=a447887e3d204944a8c766142df41453&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dovecot.org%2flist%2fdovecot%2f2010-September%2f052704.html> in 2.0.16 I am seeing the same issues. I believe this would be related to some timeouts set on our mysql servers which are pretty

Hello All, We are struggling to find a solution to a problem we are encountering with a load-balanced email setup. Currently, we have a Coyote loadbalancer, and 3 Postfix/Dovecot nodes that then get their information from a mysql database. The problem is that after a couple weeks, we start seeing NFS locking issues occur, which then takes email completely down, requiring a site visit to

Hi there, I run a system that has a lot of virtual users. We invoke deliver from exim and pass the directory to deliver into using the HOME environment variable, so deliver doesn't do any database lookups during the delivery process. The exim pipe environment is described at http://exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/index.html#toc0239, but basically I'd like to know the domain

Today I will try Dovecot Director for a setup using a Cluster Backend with GFS2 on rhel5, my question is if is Director stable for use in production for large sites, I know is mainly designed for NFS but I believe it will do the job also for a cluster filesystem like GFS2 and should solve the mail persistence problem with a node and locking issues. I plan to add a layer behind a load balancer to

Hi all, Lets say I have a maildir which doesn't contain any dovecot files but has some emails lying around in it. If I add a message to this mailbox using deliver, dovecot creates the uidlist file with a single entry (the message that was just delivered). When I then log in to the mailbox, all the other messages are added into the uidlist file in the normal order (directory list order I

Hi all, We updated to 1.1.7 a week or two back from 1.1.6 (both standard atrpms builds). Since doing so, twice now I've seen the imap services accept connections but they hang before the banner is printed (pop seems to be unaffected). I see this in the logs: Dec 23 14:02:15 mail9 dovecot: pipe() failed: Too many open files Dec 23 14:02:15 mail9 dovecot: Temporary failure in creating login

Hi guys, Anyone know what this error with deliver is (v1.1.1)? 2008-07-03T09:45:19+01:00 mail4 deliver(alexander): Panic: file mail-index-transaction.c: line 642 (mail_index_transaction_lookup): assertion failed: (seq >= t->first_new_seq && seq <= t->last_new_seq) Seen a few of these this morning. Mark -- Mark Zealey -- Shared Hosting Team Leader Product Development *

Timo - I upgraded to 2.1.10 on our director servers two nights ago and apart from errors associated with the directors processes restarting everything looked great for ~24 hours until I failed our the real servers last night to update the nfs mount options for the spools. I followed the suggested procedure for each backend server, just run on one of the directors, which seemed to work as

Hi there, I'm running Dovecot 2.0.16 just set up the director with cut&paste from the wiki. It's working & running fine for pop/imap connections (as verified by doveadm director status user), however when I specify 'RCPT TO' for a (tcp) lmtp connection straight away I get: 451 4.3.0 <xxx at yyy.com> Temporary user lookup failure and in the logs:

Hi all, We need to set our filestore to read-only for quite a while, and I want to mitigate the effects for our clients. First issue; dovecot. If we just change the nfs mounts to read-only, dovecot complains: 2009-02-19T14:03:19+00:00 mail2 dovecot: pop3-login: Login: user=<test2 at markandruth.co.uk>, method=PLAIN, rip=10.15.10.95, lip=10.15.10.102:11002 2009-02-19T14:03:19+00:00 mail2

Hello, I am trying to configure director as described at http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Director. I have previously tried the proxy and it worked. The problem I have is that whenever I try to connect I get the error: Jul 1 11:41:41 myotis40 dovecot: pop3-login: Error: auth: connect(director) failed: No such file or directory This is my doveconf -n: # 2.0.13: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS:

Hi, I've been running dovecot for many years, but now i've hit a strange problem. when retrieving imap there is sometimes in 1 of 4 imap requests a 4sec latency. * notes: - connected directly to the backends this latency disappears - removing a director from the loadbalancer(lvs) so i'm the only connected to the director this latency disappears too I would appreciate some feedback

Hi all, This is just an idea I had over the weekend; I was wondering if instead of storing the indexes/caches on disk, it would be possible to have an option to store them in a remote database (eg mysql). There are several issues that we currently have with scaling dovecot, and I think that if it could store indexes in an external database we could alleviate most of these issues. In no particular

Hi there, I'm using dovecot 2.0.16 with a mysql user database. From time to time when we have a big influx of messages (perhaps more than 30 concurrent rcpt to:<> sessions at the same time so no auth-workers free?) or when we have a transient issue connecting to the database server, we see the message: Jan 25 16:38:23 mailbox dovecot: auth-worker: sql(foo at bar.com,1.2.3.4):