similar to: PXE Question(s)

Hello, I have summarized the topics for the IO controller mini-summit and written the ideas seen in the mailing list. - The place where IO controller should be implemented - Block layer in conjunction with the IO scheduler - Common layer right above the IO scheduler - CFQ enhancement. - Both block and common layer, users can select whichever controller they want. - VFS layer -

Hello, I have summarized the topics for the IO controller mini-summit and written the ideas seen in the mailing list. - The place where IO controller should be implemented - Block layer in conjunction with the IO scheduler - Common layer right above the IO scheduler - CFQ enhancement. - Both block and common layer, users can select whichever controller they want. - VFS layer -

Hello, I have summarized the topics for the IO controller mini-summit and written the ideas seen in the mailing list. - The place where IO controller should be implemented - Block layer in conjunction with the IO scheduler - Common layer right above the IO scheduler - CFQ enhancement. - Both block and common layer, users can select whichever controller they want. - VFS layer -

Hi All, As I have notified before, The 1st Linux IO controller Mini-Summit will be held in Tokyo Japan on Oct 17 -- day before the 9th Linux kernel summit. So I would like to propose the following topics for the mini-summit and discuss about them. - Multiple IO controller development projects - There are two activities for the development of IO controller, Vivek's io-controller and

Hi All, As I have notified before, The 1st Linux IO controller Mini-Summit will be held in Tokyo Japan on Oct 17 -- day before the 9th Linux kernel summit. So I would like to propose the following topics for the mini-summit and discuss about them. - Multiple IO controller development projects - There are two activities for the development of IO controller, Vivek's io-controller and

Hi All, As I have notified before, The 1st Linux IO controller Mini-Summit will be held in Tokyo Japan on Oct 17 -- day before the 9th Linux kernel summit. So I would like to propose the following topics for the mini-summit and discuss about them. - Multiple IO controller development projects - There are two activities for the development of IO controller, Vivek's io-controller and

Folks, I''m happy to report that dates have been finalized for the next Xen Summit: November 14-16 2007; Santa Clara CA, USA Sun Microsystems have kindly agreed to host the event at their Santa Clara campus. The plan is to start at 1pm on Wednesday the 14th, then run until lunchtime on Friday. The next steps are to put together a program committee and send out a formal Call For

Folks, I''m happy to report that dates have been finalized for the next Xen Summit: November 14-16 2007; Santa Clara CA, USA Sun Microsystems have kindly agreed to host the event at their Santa Clara campus. The plan is to start at 1pm on Wednesday the 14th, then run until lunchtime on Friday. The next steps are to put together a program committee and send out a formal Call For

Hi All, We will hold a Linux IO controller Mini-Summit in Tokyo, Japan on Saturday, Oct. 17, 2009 -- day before the 9th Linux kernel summit. This is a good opportunity to meet face-to-face to discuss issues and directions for developing IO controller. Details of the summit are still sketchy, so suggestions for agenda topics are welcome. Please e-mail to me or post on the wiki page at

Hi All, We will hold a Linux IO controller Mini-Summit in Tokyo, Japan on Saturday, Oct. 17, 2009 -- day before the 9th Linux kernel summit. This is a good opportunity to meet face-to-face to discuss issues and directions for developing IO controller. Details of the summit are still sketchy, so suggestions for agenda topics are welcome. Please e-mail to me or post on the wiki page at

Hi All, We will hold a Linux IO controller Mini-Summit in Tokyo, Japan on Saturday, Oct. 17, 2009 -- day before the 9th Linux kernel summit. This is a good opportunity to meet face-to-face to discuss issues and directions for developing IO controller. Details of the summit are still sketchy, so suggestions for agenda topics are welcome. Please e-mail to me or post on the wiki page at

Hi, I just came across this annoncement, which is particularly interesting as it is only 25 min away from my place... :-) Anyway, I guess the core of this is targeted at developers mainly. Cheers, Philipp Free Software/Open Source-Telephony-Summit 2004 http://www.guug.de/veranstaltungen/telephony-summit-2004/ http://www.heise.de/newsticker/data/avr-16.12.03-000/ We are happy to announce

Folks, Regarding the Virtualization BoF, Ted Tso clarified that the remaining BoF sessons would just be scheduled on paper at OLS. We only need to use a scheduled BoF slot if we want to use a room there, I guess, else we can schedule at any free time and use a corridor or pub. Available BoF slots are only Friday evening, note. Since I don't believe the Xen team is available Friday evening,

Aiming at a release later in October (before Xen Summit I would hope), I''d like to cut RC1 next week. Please indicate any bug fixes that so far may have been missed in the backports already done. Jan

Hello I have some rules inserted in the NAT table dual SNAT and DNAT for a connection They use at some moment the same port of the outside network. The problem i have is that the connection tracking in the kernel checks first the oldest rule and then the newest one. I use a system based on ARM XScale processor. Is that the default behaviour and how can i change this behaviour? Marius

Hi, I am routinely compiling a package and since I have moved to R 2.10.0, it troncates some section texts in the doc: With the following section in the rd file: \details{ The function calls gpsbabel via the system. The gpsbabel program must be present and on the user's PATH for the function to work see <http://www.gpsbabel.org/>. The function has been tested on the following

Hi CentOS, I just completed the yum update to 4.2, hoping to get included with libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.4) for the x86_64. I need the libs to run cinelerra: [ryan at dorje]# cinelerra cinelerra: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.4' not found (required by cinelerra) An: "rpm -q -i --provides -l libstdc++-3.4.4-2" returns: (A bunch of stuff....)

On 28/06/15 02:17, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > Your script within the rpm should have the logic. Clearly if > you know how to update it, you know how to identify if it > needs updating. Thanks Joseph. I am aware of this option, but it would be only a last resort, because checking the format of the config file is error-prone. I would prefer RPM to tell me the old and new version numbers,

After reading the following articles, it doesn''t sound very hopeful for Xen. [1] Xen vs. KVM: Verdict still out on dueling hypervisors http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid80_gci1368664,00.html [2] Xen vs. KVM Linux virtualization hypervisors http://searchservervirtualization.techtarget.com/generic/0,295582,sid94_gci1371226,00.html [3] Xen vs. KVM: The Linux

After reading the following articles, it doesn''t sound very hopeful for Xen. [1] Xen vs. KVM: Verdict still out on dueling hypervisors http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid80_gci1368664,00.html [2] Xen vs. KVM Linux virtualization hypervisors http://searchservervirtualization.techtarget.com/generic/0,295582,sid94_gci1371226,00.html [3] Xen vs. KVM: The Linux