similar to: auth-worker temporary failures causing lmtp 500 rejection

Hi there, I'm running Dovecot 2.0.16 just set up the director with cut&paste from the wiki. It's working & running fine for pop/imap connections (as verified by doveadm director status user), however when I specify 'RCPT TO' for a (tcp) lmtp connection straight away I get: 451 4.3.0 <xxx at yyy.com> Temporary user lookup failure and in the logs:

Following on from this thread: http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2010-September/052704.html <https://owa2010.webfusion.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=a447887e3d204944a8c766142df41453&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dovecot.org%2flist%2fdovecot%2f2010-September%2f052704.html> in 2.0.16 I am seeing the same issues. I believe this would be related to some timeouts set on our mysql servers which are pretty

On 29 September 2014 15:16, Robinson, Paul <Paul_Robinson at playstation.sony.com> wrote: > That promise is what I understood from a discussion within the past month, > e.g. http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2014-September/076815.html > If I misunderstood, clarification on the clarification would be helpful. ;-) I see, I missed that one. My concerns seem to be similar to

In case someone's using the nixspam RBL and wondering why the influx from the CentOS mailing lists has stopped today: http://www.dnsbl.manitu.net/lookup.php?language=en&value=72.21.40.12 Kai -- Kai Sch?tzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Hi there, We're trying to convert users from Maildir to sdbox at present; I'm using dsync to achieve this (2.0.16) however when the user's have been converted we only get minimal information in the caching files. Is there some way to preserve all the caching decisions that were previously made so that when the user logs in to the new mailbox we don't have to cause an io storm

Hi all, I'm trying out bridging for my wireless and wired LAN, so that they can both use my PPPoE connection. Here's the network structure, pretty easy: darjeeling (192.168.1.7) ringo (192.168.1.3) (mtu 1500) (mtu 1500) \ / \ wlan0 <--br0 (mtu 1500)--> eth1

I've noticed an increasing tendency for people to use '=' rather than the older '<-' symbol. When '=' became available as an assignment operator in S-PLUS in the late '90s my first reaction was to switch to it as well. Brian Ripley warned me that it was not a good idea. As usual he was right, but it took a couple of pretty serious finger-burning episodes

I am getting this error: ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to mail-in.cbl.abuseat.org.: >>> DATA <<< 550 HELO for IP 24.123.23.170 was "unifiedpaging.messagenetsystems.com" 550 5.1.1 <helocheck at cbl.abuseat.org>... User unknown <<< 503-All RCPT commands were rejected with this error: <<< 503-HELO for IP

Hi list, I have a small problem with recipient_delimiters contained in usernames. Recently I have extended recipient_delimiter from "+" to "+-" in both Postfix and Dovecot (using lmtp) and now any user that have a '-' in it's username can't receive mail anymore, because lmtp truncates the localpart after the '-' and of course can't find the first

FreeBSD 11.2 Postfix 3.3.2 Dovecot 2.3.4 I am trying to use dovecot lmtp with postfix to verify authentication of incoming email and to avoid being a spam relay (an issue I was having using sendmail as my MTA). I am getting the following log message in /var/log/maillog: Mar 30 20:31:38 ns postfix/smtpd[40373]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from

Hi all, I'm currently changing some systems to use the redirector service, which means that to get local deliveries going I need to get lmtp set up so it can be redirected as well. This is working fine, however we have a number of different ports running on our servers depending on which brand a customer is using. When the time comes to do the user look up, we use (port, user, domain) to

Hi, we're running dovecot 1.1.2 (centos5 32-bit rpm from atrpms) havn't had any real issues with it, but today it looks like an index has become badly corrupted. We're seeing this in the logs every time we log in to a particular account: 2008-09-10T11:56:07+01:00 mail8 dovecot: Panic: IMAP(xxx): Trying to allocate 2273345672 bytes 2008-09-10T11:56:07+01:00 mail8 dovecot: IMAP(xxx):

I'm running Dovecot 2.2.27 (c0f36b0) on Debian Stretch and I'm having some trouble with LMTP delivery from Postfix to Dovecot. The message in the logs is Mar 9 09:21:19 mail postfix/smtpd[3295]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from some.mail.server[1.2.3.4]: 450 4.1.1 <alias at my.domain>: Recipient address rejected: unverified address: host my.mail.server[private/dovecot-lmtp] said: 550

Hello We have migrated our email services from a server, which did not support IMAP and folders, therefore threated the plus sign + as a normal character in a part of an email address. Our new server delivers the emails via lmtp to dovecot. the few users which got a + character in the username first could not log-in (fixed by adding + to auth_username_chars). Now the next problem turn out to

Hi, About a week ago I upgraded our reasonably heavily loaded mail servers from a pretty recent courier version to dovecot-1.1rc10. IMAP performance on dovecot is amazing, however POP3 performance is worse than courier :-( I have uploaded some munin graphs taken today to http://linweb.atlas.pipex.net/dovecot/; the dovecot server is handling about 2000 pop logins/sec and 300 imap sessions (but

Hi there, I was doing some testing on sdbox yesterday. Basically I did the following procedure: 1) Create new sdbox; deliver 2 messages into it (u.1, u.2) 2) Create a copy of the index file (no cache file created yet) 3) deliver another message to the mailbox (u.3) 4) copy back index file from stage (2) 5) deliver new mail Then the message delivered in stage 3 ie u.3 gets replaced with the

<!doctype html> <html> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> </head> <body> <div> <br> </div> <blockquote type="cite"> <div> On 31 March 2019 17:41 Jerry via dovecot < <a href="mailto:dovecot@dovecot.org">dovecot@dovecot.org</a>> wrote: </div> <div>

Hi all, I?ve got postfix setup to use dovecot-lmtp for (virtual) user delivery, and things to users or aliases that Dovecot knows about now get delivered correctly. However, I?ve done something wrong with postfix and/or the LMTP configuration because upon RCPT TO, instead of forwarding the mail off to the configured smartest, somehow dovecot-lmtp is ending up in the mix. (Perhaps this is more a

Hi, I am trying to set up my own mail server (to get off Google) and I have a problem with mail delivery. I'm using Postfix as a SMTP front-end, and use the LMTP server included in dovecot to receive mail from postfix. I have a setup which works with the dovecot LDA, it involves calling dovecot-lda with the -d flag. Postfix computes the username by removing what's after the

Dear All, I'm having an intermittent problem, with dovecot slowing to a crawl. Restarting dovecot fixes the problem. Looking at the maillog, I see loads of these errors.... dovecot: pipe() failed: Too many open files dovecot: Temporary failure in creating login processes, slowing down for now dovecot: Created login processes successfully, unstalling looking at the processes, I can see