similar to: Re: Setting capabilities for process running under Wine

Whenever I run any application with wine it takes upwards of five minutes to start, even apps included with wine like wine cmd. I have been googling this for hours and cannot find anything really applicable to my situation. I am running Fedora 14 x86_64. I don't have a network printer. As far as I am aware fc-cache-32 doesn't exist on Fedora. I am trying to get some other program to

Hey there I've been using wine for various application and I'm wondering if anybody got enough luck working out livezilla in wine I've tried everything possible core fonts and netframework 2.0 Is it possible to run it under wine at all? what about netframework 3.5?

I was wondering if it might be possible for an rsync developer to look over the attached patch (tested on Linux 2.4.24 against the rsync-2.6.0 release), and offer suggestions on how I could improve it. Basically I want to use Linux finer grained capabilities to retain only CAP_SYS_CHROOT & CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH when rsync drops root privs. That way I can take whole system backups as a (mostly)

Hi! I installed wine - version 1.2.2, and cs 1.6 no stream, on ubuntu 11.04, But when I start the counter-strike.bat, got the following error: CS>counter-strike.bat fixme:exec:SHELL_execute flags ignored: 0x00000100 Z:\home\battuske\.PlayOnLinux\wineprefix\CS\drive_c\Program Files\CS> fixme:ole:OleLoadPictureEx (0x93022c,774,1,{7bf80980-bf32-101a-8bbb-00aa00300cab},x=0,y=0,f=0,0x33f198),

I've upgraded mine Ubuntu distribution and mouse wheel does not work anymore (just in Wine), any suggestions?

Lukash wrote: > Hello to everybody! > I finally managed to launch Mafia II on my Ubuntu 10.10 64bit - Steam version thanx to Kairhos. I was not able to do so earlier. > But, If I try to launch new game, it gets stuck. Any ideas? Thanks Hi! I was able to launch Mafia on Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit :)

jjmckenzie wrote: > On 5/22/11 9:29 AM, vitamin wrote: > > > Vincent van Bruchem wrote: > > > > > err:ole:CoCreateInstance apartment not initialised > > > > > Post complete terminal output, not just one line. > > > > > Not only that, vitamin, but this error does not indicate anything wrong > is happening. I get these all the time

Hi, I believe having less root setuid binaries on system is The Way ... so: Why does RH6.2 ships with /sbin/dump & /sbin/restore root setuid? These are for sysadmins, not for regular users I hope. Is /sbin/unix_chkpwd really used and what is it used for? I haven't find anything about it in pam documentation. Is it really necessary to ship /usr/bin/gpasswd and /usr/bin/newgrp? Does

Thunderbird wrote: > You should set this capability on wineserver as that's what is actually creating the sockets. Thanks, this did the trick for me. (v. 1.1.44)

I'm trying to create a setuid Perl script (yes, I am aware about the security implications), but am getting this error: % cat testsetuid.pl #!/usr/bin/perl -UT print "My real user id is $< but my effective user id is $>\n"; exit(0); % ./testsetuid.pl Can't do setuid (cannot exec sperl) I am using the stock Perl that came with CentOS 4.5. The problem I

We have a large (20Gb, 250000 files) tree which needs to replicate across our WAN on a regular basis. We have been using a wrapper script around rsync to do this; the wrapper script runs setuid-root on a Solaris 8 server. However, we have on-going problems with files whose permissions don't replicate correctly. These file permissions are the REAL problem; if the permissions aren't

Hi, many people are having problems using SFTP with ChrootDirectory when the jail directory (or the path above) is not owned by root. The question is if chroot'ing to usual home directories can be allowed, even though they are owned by regular users. I know that this topic has been discussed on the list several times now, so I searched the list archives for posts that invalidate the

Well, I had just finally gotten around to downloading a snapshot to test the latest on Tru64 a couple of days ago but hadn't had a chance to build it yet, and 3.7p1 has now been released. Sigh. The problem is that Tru64 setreuid() and setregid() are broken, so privsep doesn't work. This could also be a security problem for SIA authentication in general (any version of OpenSSH on Tru64,

Hello, I'm trying to export a /home/ partition for multiple users, using Samba and the setuids option. My goal is to deliver emails into $HOME/.Maildir/ for each user. So I mount the share as user "root", hoping that each user will be able to use their own home directory (just like an NFS /home/ mount). (This feature depends on the Unix extensions.) I have the

I make a simple mail program which need listen port 25 and 110.but i found it's imposible , after searching with google i found non-root user can't listen port under 1024.at first i try a script(witch lauch my program) and use setuid but that still did't work.any way can handle this. Thanks for any help. -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From:

hay.. how to make all the applications installed in wine can be used by all users on Fedora 15? thanks

All, Could someone explain the purpose of the uidswap functions with respect to ssh ( the client ). From what I gathered , ssh installs as setuid root and swaps ids when reading potential key files that may be read only by root. Also , I think when binding to a privileged port ssh swaps id. Is that so? What are the consequnences if you do not install ssh setuid root? ( As far I as know no uid

Running dovecot 1.2.4 on FreeBSD using Postfix. Everything works fine normally, but deliver is executable by world. This is not normally a problem, as I don't run deliver SetUID root. But for whatever reason, when deliver is called by something that IS SetUID root I get the following error: /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver must not be both world-executable and setuid-root. This

I reported the following vulnerability to AUSCERT, but they weren''t interested. People on this list might be, though! GNU tar is lazy about file creation modes and file owners when unpacking a tar file. Because GNU tar defaults to creating files owned by the userid running tar when the username is not found on your system, it can be possible to inadvertantly create setuid root

I'm running Debian/Squeeze on an AMD64 system. For some reason they have recently stopped shipping mount.cifs with the setuid bit set. Now it appears that they have changed the internal settings to prevent it from running setuid. This means that I can't define the share in fstab with "user" and connect from my Linux user account. Mounting smb/cifs shares seems to be blocked