similar to: [nut-commits] svn commit r3407 - trunk/docs/man

Well, that wasn't as nasty as I feared it would be. Turns out that in the general case it's possible to partition a mixed-branch revision into branch cliques and generate multiple import-stream commits, one for each affected branch. We lose only if the split commit is the source of a later directory copy; I have a check for that that says, basically, "if you see this fatal error,

This is a consolidated reply to your four most recent emails. > I am trying to leverage reposurgeon to automate the process of finding merge > points, and I seem to be spinning my wheels. Can you provide an example of how > you are searching for merges? Not a working one, yet. That code is buggy. It's my next thing to work on. >reposurgeon% merge (apcsmart-dev)

On Nov 13, 2012, at 3:37 PM, Arnaud Quette wrote: > Fix Buildbot failures on commit r3776 One small request in the commit messages: please mention exact commit numbers only if the commit is hard to find. Something like "fix buildbot failures from previous commit" is specific enough, without making the reader look up a specific commit number. The reason is that it will be harder to

--- upsmon.8 2012-01-23 11:52:34.000000000 +0200 +++ upsmon.8.mod 2012-01-23 11:53:27.000000000 +0200 @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ upsmon \- UPS monitor and shutdown contr .sp \fBupsmon\fR \-c \fIcommand\fR .sp -\fBupsmon\fR [\-D] [\-p] [\-u \fIuser\fR] +\fBupsmon\fR [\-D] [\-K] [\-p] [\-u \fIuser\fR] .SH "DESCRIPTION" .sp \fBupsmon\fR is the client process that is responsible for

On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Regid Ichira <regid23 at nt1.in> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 04:51:52PM -0400, Gene Cumm wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Regid Ichira <regid23 at nt1.in> wrote: > Without --force I get: > Not a removable drive (use -f to override) > I tried now without --force, and to ignore the suggestion to use -f. > It

On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 04:51:52PM -0400, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Regid Ichira <regid23 at nt1.in> wrote: > > > label xp > > com32 chain.c32 > > append hd0 1 ntldr=/ntldr > > > 2. Installed by > > From xp cmd prompt: > > c:\downloadedPrograms\syslinux\syslinux.exe --active \ > >

There is now a public reposurgeon repository at: git at gitorious.org:reposurgeon/reposurgeon.git I've tagged 2.0pre9 there, for two purposes: * Charles can verify that I've solved the missing-files problem. * Hartmut can rework the few of his patches I didn't merge into reposurgeon. Charles, our next and final challenge is to generate proper merge commits in the NUT repo

Dear developers, thanks to Charles (Lepple) and ESR hard work, we are now able to finalize our migration from Subversion to Git, on Alioth. As of now, our Subversion repository on Alioth<https://alioth.debian.org/scm/?group_id=30602>is FROZEN! Any new svn commit may simply be discarded, so beware! Most active developers are currently using github, as a temporary mean. But if you have any

I've solved the detached-branch problem! It wasn't actually the branch-rename overwrites that were doing this - turns out I was trying to remove cvs2svn-generated junk commits too soon and in the process deleting critical branch links. I've uploaded a new tarball to http://www.catb.org/esr/nut-conversion/nut-conversion.tar.gz with the 2.0-pre3 version of reposurgeon in it. That

Hi Eric, One corner case I ran across when building from a reposurgeon-generated tree is that .gitignore files do not seem to be generated when a directory is created at the same time as its svn:ignore property is set. In NUT, this manifests itself in r3109: http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/3109 Trac doesn't show it there, but scripts/avahi was created in that commit,

I received the attached bug report from a Debian user; it applies to http://www.openssh.com/faq.html (I ship a copy of the FAQ in the Debian package). Could somebody make this adjustment on the OpenSSH web site? Thanks, -- Colin Watson [cjwatson at debian.org] -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Regid Ichira

On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Regid Ichira <regid23 at nt1.in> wrote: > label xp > com32 chain.c32 > append hd0 1 ntldr=/ntldr > 2. Installed by > From xp cmd prompt: > c:\downloadedPrograms\syslinux\syslinux.exe --active \ > --directory /downloadedPrograms/syslinux/ --force \ > --install --mbr c: Why are you

(Copied to Dave Hart at the NTP project, who's interested in the code's progress for non-NUTty reasons. Dave, the background is that I'm doing a trial conversion of the Network UPS Tools repo.) First, repostreamer per se is dead. As it evolved it kept pulling in more bits of code from reposurgeon until I said "screw it!" and merged the repostreamer logic in as a reposurgeon

Hi! Anyone else experiencing performance problems when using the new monorepo? My experience is that performance of gitk (and git log) sometimes is really bad when working in the monorepo. I've mainly seen it when using gitk on specific files/directories, but since gitk seems to be using "git log --no-color -z --pretty=raw --show-notes --parents --boundary HEAD -- <file>" it

Hans van Kranenburg writes ("Re: git workflow, redux"): > On 08/23/2018 08:07 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > > I think git-debrebase is going to be easier for all these things than > > the current approach. > > Ok, let's try it! Thanks a lot for doing the above writeup. Great, thanks. (I hope it's OK that I have snipped most of your responses to the discussion,

Hi, I have been trying to do a regression test between 1.1.10 and 1.1.12, as there seems to be a number of problems with the installation of the Macromedia suite (Dreamweaver, Fireworks, Flash). I think I have ccache installed. I think I have git OK. I run git bisect start ok, Then when I run git bisect good wine 1.1.10, I get: Bad rev input: wine 1.1.10. What am I doing wrong?

I was trying to set up a USB stick with syslinux.exe, on a XP machine. Had the following problems: 1. Tried: 1.1 from XP native cmd shell: E:\>syslinux\syslinux.exe --directory /syslinux --install --force --mbr --active e: 1.2 and a similar command from cygwin. where e: is the USB stick. With cygwin I got a segmentation fault. With XP

My reason for patching circa line 225 is that I think it is clearer. The reason for patching circa line 575 is http://bugs.debian.org/647603. They concluded that a .0 file is recognized not only by PXELINUX. And what is NBP? --- a/doc/syslinux.txt 2011-12-07 04:53:29.201556663 +0200 +++ b/doc/syslinux.txt 2011-12-07 04:50:11.000000000 +0200 @@ -221,7 +221,6 @@ LABEL label The following

On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 21:07, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >> > Known issue. http://bugzilla.syslinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35 and >> perhaps a few others but this should be resolved in the master branch. >> > I just committed my fix this morning so there's no -pre

Riello Netman Plus 102 Card plugged into a Riello Sentinel SDL 6000-7 and a Riello Sentinel Dual SDH 1000-7 upsc RielloSentinelSDL6000 battery.charge: 100.0 battery.current: 0.0 battery.runtime: 16560.0 battery.runtime.low: 3 battery.voltage: 217.7 driver.name: snmp-ups driver.parameter.mibs: ietf driver.parameter.pollinterval: 2 driver.parameter.port: 10.20.30.39 driver.version: 2.2.2