similar to: Regarding Pubkey Enumeration

Hi, Sorry, It comes by fetching ENVELOPE, not BODYSTRUCTURE. For example: A01 UID FETCH 24 (ENVELOPE) * 4 FETCH (UID 24 ENVELOPE ("Fri, 08 Dec 2017 09:44:35 +0900" "test2" ((NIL NIL "service" "paypal.com")) (("dev1" NIL "dev1-bounces" "example.com")) ((NIL NIL "service" "paypal.com")) (("user1"

Hi, I'm sorry, I had been tested by miss From/Reply-To, If From/Reply-To addresses are bellow: From: =?utf-8?b?c2VydmljZUBwYXlwYWwuY29tPGlmcmFtZSBvbmxvYWQ9YWxlcnQoZG9jdW1lbnQuY29va2llKSBzcmM9aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaHVzaG1haWwuY29tIHN0eWxlPSJkaXNwbGF5Om5vbmUi?==?utf-8?Q?=0A=00?=@mailsploit.com Reply-To:

Hello! I have problems with using of "readBin" to read files, which was written in C with "fwrite". In the C-File there is the following Code: fwrite(MyitINI,sizeof(itINItype),1,outfile); where MyitINI is a structure of the following form typedef struct{ int KernelFileSave; /* Determined, if Systemmatrix saved or not.*/ char KernelFileName[200]; /* A-Matrix name

Hi, I tried to see a mail that have a strange From header in bellow URL: https://www.mailsploit.com/index Then, I got BODYSTRUCTURE response contain next: ((NIL NIL "service" "paypal.com")) Are this problem already founded by anyone? So already fixed? -- TACHIBANA Masashi QUALITIA CO., LTD. mailto:tachibana at qualitia.co.jp

A severe vulnerability was found in the random number generator (RNG) of the Debian OpenSSL package, starting with version 0.9.8c-1 (and similar packages in derived distributions such as Ubuntu). While this bug is not present in the OpenSSL packages provided by CentOS, it may still affect CentOS users. The bug barred the OpenSSL random number generator from gaining enough entropy required for

Hi, Additionally, I just tried bellow: From: service at paypal.com<iframe onload=alert(document.cookie) src=https://www.hushmail.com style="display:none"\n\0 at mailsploit.com Reply-To: service at paypal.com<iframe onload=alert(document.cookie) src=https://www.hushmail.com style="display:none"\n\0 at mailsploit.com Thanks ----- Original Message ----- > Hi, >

I have some security alert log data that I'm parsing and doing some stats on. One of the fields is the "Classtype" which is the enumerated value of the type of alert found. classtypes = factor( alerts$Classtype ) fclass_types = table( classtypes ) fclass_types gives me a frequency table of the intrusion types: fclass_types classtypes

Hello, I'm new to using WINE (and to these lists), so I apologize if this has been asked and answered already: Has anyone been able to get Ghost Recon to at least install? The autorun program came up just fine, but when I click the button to install, it promptly quits. I tried running the setup.exe program directly, and it gets as far as trying to setup and install shield wizard, and then

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

On 3/6/19 1:28 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 3/6/19 6:26 AM, Mike McTernan (wavemobile) wrote: > > On 3/5/19 5:48 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: <snip> > > Last question, if I may - Is there any specific reason why an i686 PAE > > kernel built from the main RHEL sources isn't in the AltArch i386 os- repo? > > > > Notably CentOS 6 provided both non-PAE and

maybe this is a silly question ;-) But why is it possible to login on a machine with a locked account (passwd -l ) via pubkey-authentication (authorized_keys) ? I use OpenSSH3.01p1on Solaris8 with PAM support so I thought this should not happen. If this is the normal behaviour and built in intentionally what would be the easiest way to lock an account without deleting the users authorized_keys ?

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38992 Summary: GeForce 9500 GT: starts only with nouveau.noaccel=1 Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Drivers/DRI/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at

On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 18:47:37 +0900, TACHIBANA Masashi wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to see a mail that have a strange From header in bellow URL: > > https://www.mailsploit.com/index > > Then, I got BODYSTRUCTURE response contain next: > > ((NIL NIL "service" "paypal.com")) > > Are this problem already founded by anyone? > So already

Hi Bert, I won't post any more messages on this thread as problem has shifted from Optimization in R to Graph Algorithms. Rest fine Khris. On Aug 2, 2012, at 9:13 PM, Bert Gunter [via R] wrote: > This discussion needs to be taken off (this) list, as it appears to > have nothing to do with R. > > -- Bert > > On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:27 AM, khris <[hidden email]>

I'm having trouble with R CMD INSTALL Rmpi_0.5-5.tar.gz --configure-args=~/lam lam is is installed locally. lamboot -d (or lamboot-d and also recon) works. make -k check from the lamtest suite passes all tests. Is this is problem with the -fPIC compiler as in the message? Should it be modified in the Makefile? Any help or comments are appreciated, thanks. * Installing to library

No, I just think 15 years or so is more than enough time to have addressed the issue. On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 14:05:08 -0700, Dan Kaminsky wrote: > So, this isn't your problem and you don't respect the people's whose > problem it is. > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Iain Morgan <imorgan at nas.nasa.gov> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:55:18

Hi all On 07/07/2015 10:30 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/07/2015 12:20 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: [.... loads of stuff deleted .... ] >> OH .. I see, I did not get the firmware files, but their git pointer info :) >> >> I will rebuild and repost. >> > Please try the packages that are now in the same location. > >

Protocols and ciphers are sunsetted all the time, this is a regular thing, but there are announcements before breaking changes are inserted. You assume people are slow to update anyway; some are, some aren't, what you're doing is wildly rewarding the slow updaters and punishing the fast ones. That has negative effects elsewhere. What would it hurt to announce the release in 3-6 months

On Tue, 24 Mar 2015, Dan Kaminsky wrote: > Hmm. Feels a little aggressive for ssh client. Support heartily for sshd. People who need it can build their own, or OS vendors might supply a non-default v.1 capable client binary themselves. IMO it's time to apply some selection pressure to a protocol that can't be secured. -d

Am Di, 20. Feb 2018, 23:13:16 -0800 schrieb Dan Kaminsky: > Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 23:13:16 -0800 > From: Dan Kaminsky <dan at doxpara.com> > To: J? Fahlke <jorrit at jorrit.de> > Cc: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org > Subject: Re: Is there socksify script for dynamics forwardings to unix > domain sockets? > > Whoa. That's pretty cool. > >