similar to: MSDFS on [homes] share for two samba servers

Hello, Last week I submitted a problem with msdfs on samba. I didn't receive any reaction. I've also tried the samba-cvs version but this has also problems. We really like to use msdfs from samba, because we want to put all our homedirectories ( more than 4000 ) in one dfsroot. This is not possible with Microsoft's dfs because this has a limit of 1000 .... I didn't found this

Hi all, I currently have one dovecot 2.2.15 working and I would like to add a second master server. If I configure the second server and enable the dsync in both servers, the sync will copy everything from A to B ? I mean, B server won't remove messages in A as it doesn't have anything in its users mailbox? The second master server will be a cold server just for contingency. Thanks

just small update: - idfix tool (Directory Synchronization Error Remediation Tool / https://github.com/microsoft/idfix) shows just small issues like empty/missing displayName attrib in some of objects which I have corrected and no more issues present at all. - no errors from AAD connect event viewer: final log message is "Scheduler::SchedulerThreadMain : Completed configured scheduler

Hello I have exactly the same trouble as described here: http://www.nabble.com/ldap-passwd-sync-on-3.0.25a-tf4261008.html on samba-3.0.25b-2.fc7. When i set "ldap passwd sync" to "only" and I change password on some ldap samba user, password in attribute userPassword is never changed by samba daemon (to update NT and LM password I use smbk5pwd overlay). If i set pwd sync to

Hi Michal, Seems we are doing similar things at the moment: getting samba to work with azure AD. We also see the high CPU usage on the DC that the Azure AD Connect server connected to. Between 70 - 100 percent in our case. We are not seeing any replication issues after azure AD Connect, and I have a script that automatically checks replication every few minutes. I was the one reporting the

hello our AD domain is hosted by two samba AD domain controllers version 4.12.6 - replication between controllers is fine, no problems. - no schema errors. - no database errors, all fine. - no CPU utilizations - wthout noticeable bandwidth utilization Recently we have deployed Azure AD connector on dedicated windows system (system is domain member server). since this deployment we are observing

I have been using multiple observers, i.e., observe_field(), on the same input field and relying on them to execute in the same order that they appear in the page. This has been working fine in FireFox, but it does not seem to work in MSIE; the requests come in and are processed in a different order. Now, I''ve always been a little hesitant about using this technique, but it always

Why is that when you create a share, the default is 'msdfs root = yes'? Also, why is that a share that is set 'msdfs root = yes' -- or, rather, a share that does /not/ set 'msdfs root = no' -- advertises that it is a DFS root to the Linux CIFS client, /even /when 'host msdfs = no'? This sounds like A) a bug (ignoring 'host msdfs', and B) a misfeature (msdfs

Hello, i got a msdfs share running and now i want to hide folders from users who got no access to them anyway. For example: List of shares: test1 test2 User sees only: test1 Is something like that possible mit samba itself or does someone know a workaround to get it running like that ? Thanks for any ideas. A.Dura

07.06.2024 07:54, Jeremy Allison wrote: >> msdfs is broken in 4.19.? It worked fine in 4.18. This is not entirely true. >> Is no one using msdfs?? I wonder why I was the first to discover this? > > There must not be a test for your specific use-case. > > MSDFS is tested in the autobuild test suite. Can > you articulate the problem well enough we can > build a

On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 07:16:06AM +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: >06.06.2024 19:33, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: > >>For quite some time I'm trying to find what's going on with MSDFS referrals. >>Samba version is 4.19.6. >.. >>However, when opening the directory in question from client, this name is not >>shown in the listing.? Samba skips

This patch adds SMP support to the previous version. Since that has not been merged I have included it in this patch. This should apply cleanly to the tip. Below is the text of the original submittal, slightly updated. Attached is a preliminary patch that adds Intel(R) LaGrande Technology (LT) (Safer Mode Extensions - SMX) support to Xen. While there are still several enhancements needed for

I've set up a dfs share according to instructions. There is one part of the instructions that I don't understand. I've checked the forum archives but can't find any examples which might help. In the Instructions section (4.1 of the HTML Samba Project Documentation), is shows how to set up the symbolic links in a DFS share, as shown below. I have 2 Samba servers (SMB1 and SMB2).

Hi, I'm new on Samba... I'm trying to set a samba server with a DFS share. I have found this example: # The smb.conf file: [global] netbios name = SAMBA host msdfs = yes [dfs] path = /export/dfsroot msdfs root = yes then I must create some link into /export/dfsroot: root# cd /export/dfsroot root# chown root /export/dfsroot root# chmod 755 /export/dfsroot root# ln -s

I tryed to use msdfs, but it doesn't work. Is it my fault, or is it a bug? log.snmd: smbd/msdfs.c:295(create_conn_struct) create_conn_struct: Can't ChDir to new conn path /mypath/host/%u. Error was No such file or directory Part of smb.conf: [global] ... host msdfs = yes ... [eb] path = /mypath/data/eb force group =smb valid users = @gruppeeb write list = @gruppeeb browseable = no

Hi List, I am struggling a little bit with the msdfs proxy parameter. I want the samba server as a kind of a bridge between two networks, that the samba server only shares some of the shares provided by our file server to a second network. I don't want the samba srv to be a gw or give the clients a route to the internal network, because it is a total different user group. I first tried to

Hello, everyone, I'm seeing some inconsistent behavior across SMB clients when configuring shares using the "msdfs proxy" parameter, and was hoping to get some advice from the community on this. My issue is that various SMB clients seem to behave differently when this parameter is pointed as a path that includes a sub-folder under the root share. So, given the following share

Hi, After some experiment with MSDFS on Samba I have seen this problems and I don't know if this are caused by my possible wrong configuration or if are "feature" of MSDFS: -as described into the documentation I compiled a Samba version with --with-msdfs and this smb.conf (server 172.26.11.236). The configuration file is: [Global] host msdfs = yes [dfs] path = /mnt/disk

06.06.2024 19:33, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: > For quite some time I'm trying to find what's going on with MSDFS referrals. > Samba version is 4.19.6. .. > However, when opening the directory in question from client, this name is not > shown in the listing.? Samba skips this name from the listing when looping over > readdir entries: So, the same config just works in

On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 11:54:28AM +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: >07.06.2024 10:13, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: > >>There is a little difference with your config: I am not using >>symlinks in the filesystem but 'msdfs proxy' in smb.conf.? Not sure >>if that can be related to your finding? > >msdfs proxy is not affected in this context. It is