similar to: CentOS post acknowledgement

Hi Guys, Running the following with a Sangoma A101D PRI card: *Asterisk 1.4.21.2* *LibPRI version: 1.4.10* No inbound or outbound calls can be made. In fact Asterisk CLI doesn't show any activity. Problem goes away on restart of the system or maybe asterisk. I see post about upgrading Libpri to 1.4.10.2 and then I see posts that even that didn't work. Anyone can weigh in this please?

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org > [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Robert Heller > Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 15:46 > To: CentOS mailing list > Cc: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Creating an alternitive install CD for CentOS > 5.2 (w/patched mkinitrd) > > At Sun, 8 Mar 2009 08:47:50 -0400 CentOS

I keep getting repeated copies of ``R-help post acknowledgements'' in respect of a couple of postings that I made to the list this morning (my time). I only posted each posting *once*. I hope that others are not getting repeated copies of my postings .... I mean I *know* my postings are so wonderful they merit re-reading, but one does not need another copy in order to re-read! :-)

Centos 4.0 and 4.1 seem to have a memory leak somewhere and I can't find out what is doing it. I think it may be dovecot. I have installed hundreds of Linux machines, centos/redhat/suse in the past as firewalls and mail relays and use the same/similar methodolgy and config for each. I have found that since Centos 4.0 and 4.1 came along machines that have run well for years and months,

I'm trying to wean my self using the Agent channel in Asterisk. The main reason I use it is for the callback acknowledgement , where the user presses # to finally acknowledge the call. I have implemented this in the Dialplan using the Macro in the docs. This works well as long as the user enters something. However if the user hangs up , then both sides of the bridge call are hung up as

Le 22/04/2017 ? 16:25, Darr247 a ?crit : > Try centos.org/forums instead. > > I tend to avoid wiki sites to which I'm not allowed to contribute; > maybe you'd feel like jumping through their hoops, though. i.e. see > item 3 at wiki.centos.org/Contribute As far as I understand, the CentOS mailing list is this distribution's primary form of communication. Please correct

On 10/4/19 10:00 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > On 10/4/19 3:03 PM, Chris Adams wrote: >> ... >> See the NetworkManager-config-server package. > Ahh, thanks. I was wondering about it but never investigated. Hmmmm..... Description : This adds a NetworkManager configuration file to make it behave more like the old "network" service. In particular, it stops

On 10/4/19 4:42 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: > On 10/4/19 10:00 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> On 10/4/19 3:03 PM, Chris Adams wrote: >>> ... >>> See the NetworkManager-config-server package. >> Ahh, thanks. I was wondering about it but never investigated. > Hmmmm..... > Description : > This adds a NetworkManager configuration file to make it behave more >

Hi Guys, Anyone might know why this error keeps showing up and inbound/outbound is not working on a Bell PRI with Sangoma A101D? -- Got SABME from network peer. Sending Unnumbered Acknowledgement No calls can be made inbound/outbound. Keeps repeating. No alarms ON and no changes been made to the system. Stopped all a sudden. Asterisk CLI doesn't show anything with full verbose for both

Dear Debian-Bugteam Unfortunately this problem still exists. I want to use the server in production environment, but can't by reason of this error. Installed XEN-Versions: ii xen-hypervisor-4.4-amd64 4.4.1-9+deb8u5 amd64 Xen Hypervisor on AMD64 ii xen-linux-system-3.16.0-4-amd64 3.16.7-ckt25-2 amd64

Le 10/11/2017 ? 09:39, James Pearson a ?crit?: > I manually built the driver - from the nvidia-installer.log : > > nvidia-installer command line: > ./nvidia-installer > --accept-license > --no-questions > --silent > --install-libglvnd > > The nouveau driver is blacklisted via the boot cmdline option: > > rd.driver.blacklist=nouveau

Is there a process for finding status updates to open bugs within Centos? The particular bug I am talking about is 0002329 http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2329. This was assigned on 01-20-2008 and, as far as I can tell, there's been no action other than it being acknowledged. I've also searched upstream with RHEL and FC and I cannot seem to find a bug report there though complaints

Dear XEN-Team I've set up a complete new VM, tested copying and backuping with following error again: [ 1920.052129] INFO: task jbd2/xvda2-8:98 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [ 1920.052143] Not tainted 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 [ 1920.052147] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [ 1920.052153] jbd2/xvda2-8 D ffff880004986e78 0 98

At 07:11 AM 8/17/2020, you wrote: >On 8/13/20 11:23 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: > > Hey All, > > > > Is it safe to allow the 193 series kernel update now?? Last time I tried > > that my system refused to boot.? I had to roll back to the 4.18.0-147 > > kernel to get my machine to reboot. > > > > Since that happened I've been watching this mail list

On 1/26/23 20:25, Philip Wyett wrote: > On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 13:16 -0600, Bill Gee wrote: >> I have been running boinc client on CentOS7 hosts for some years. C7 is >> getting close to end of life. Time to upgrade to C9 ... >> >> But I cannot find a package for the boinc client. "dnf search boinc" >> returns nothing. >> >> I have enabled

Nicolas, Did you play with nvidia-settings? Maybe also wipe out xorg.conf and start afresh. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nicolas Kovacs" <info at microlinux.fr> > To: "James Pearson" <james-p at moving-picture.com>, "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org>

I'm trying to configure sip2sip, which says: http://wiki.sip2sip.info/projects/sip2sip/wiki/SipDevicesAsterisk "Asterisk, is currently unable to handle more that one result for a DNS SRV lookup, and the Asterisk configuration needed for getting it work with the SIP2SIP service is not trivial" It then gives a complex multi-section workaround in SIP. I remember reading there'd be

Dear All, My apologies for asking my question on less appropriate list. I did ask it on centos-mirror at centos.org, but that list is really low traffic (and slow response probably - I only got acknowledgement of my post...). On the other hand, I'm sure there are many public mirror maintainers on this list who may help me with my trouble. Upon replacing faulty machine hosting public mirrors

On Nov 17, 2019, at 11:58 AM, Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr> wrote > * chrony: I'm using ntpd and ntpdate You should never be using ntpdate anymore (which is why the ntp project is deprecating it, http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Dev/DeprecatingNtpdate <http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Dev/DeprecatingNtpdate> ). I really only ever suggest ntpd unless you?re running an

Am 17.11.19 um 23:52 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs: > > Le 17/11/2019 ? 18:56, Jonathan Billings a ?crit?: >> You should never be using ntpdate anymore (which is why the ntp project is deprecating it, http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Dev/DeprecatingNtpdate <http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Dev/DeprecatingNtpdate> ). I really only ever suggest ntpd unless you?re running an NTP server