similar to: Python bindings for libvirt

Hi, I am facing the below error while compiling dom0. Please guide. root@cbananth:/usr/src/xen-3.3.1# make linux-2.6-xen0-config CONFIGMODE=menuconfig make -f buildconfigs/mk.linux-2.6-xen0 config make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/xen-3.3.1'' set -e ; \ if [ ! -e linux-2.6.18-xen.hg/.hg ] ; then \ __repo=$(sh buildconfigs/select-repository linux-2.6.18-xen.hg .:..) ; \

Hello, When I install guest OS on xen using "xm create /path/of/file/ubuntu.cfg -c" , I am getting an error message *"Error*: Device 0 (*vif*) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not working <http://markmail.org/message/24aj3qs6ddrtwdks>" . I also saw that hotplugs and udev are prerequisites to be installed before compiling xen. I could not find hotplugs in Yast.

Hello, When I install guest OS on xen using "xm create /path/of/file/ubuntu.cfg -c" , I am getting an error message *"Error*: Device 0 (*vif*) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not working <http://markmail.org/message/24aj3qs6ddrtwdks>" . I also saw that hotplugs and udev are prerequisites to be installed before compiling xen. I could not find hotplugs in Yast.

Hi, Libvirt provides classes such as Xen_ComputerSystem, Xen_Processor etc., in order to build applications using libvirt-api which can interact with the Xen Hypervisor. I would like to know what are the corresponding classes for the KVM hypervisor, so that I can use libvirt-cim to communicate with the hypervisor. Would it be Kvm_ComputerSystem or Qemu_Computersystem? Any help in this regard

Hi libvirt users: Who can tell me where is the fucking doc? I want to use libvirt-python in my project.But I can't found the doc. I only found "TBD" in http://libvirt.org/guide/html/Application_Development_Guide-Language_Bindings.html Did I miss something? Thanks. -- ???: http://www.xuanmingyi.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I am trying to connect to libvirt on KVM host from a remote python client, using the connection string "qemu+ssh://<IP Address>/system" If I setup password less SSH (Public key) between the machines, I am able to proceed with the connection. But If I have not setup the public key authentication, my code hangs trying to connect to libvirt, and there is a prompt for entering

fixing missing subject line in original email. ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Ananth Durbha <avdurbha at yahoo.com> To: llvm list <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2011 11:38 PM Subject: Hi,      I am interested in getting llvm IR only for a subset of the input source code - basically starting from a specified top level function, including all its callee

Just adding a few more details to the previous mail so that I can avoid some trouble for you folks. 1. I have done a /execname != "dtrace"/ to avoid dtrace itself causing more syscalls to be fired. 2. I have also supressed the printing on the terminal which makes dtrace slower. And what happens is this: dtrace -qn ''syscall::read:entry /execname != "dtrace"/ {

Hi,      I am interested in getting llvm IR only for a subset of the input source code - basically starting from a specified top level function, including all its callee functions (recursively).      For example, in the following code, I am interested in a command like "extract -top_function blah()" that will create an llvm IR with just blah() and foo().       int foo() {          

Hi, I am using KVM hypervisor on Ubuntu 12.04 (libvirt-0.9.8). The call to list the interfaces seem to be failing on this version of libvirt as seen below. virsh # iface-list error: Failed to list active interfaces error: this function is not supported by the connection driver: virConnectNumOfInterfaces I have seen this issue with libvirt 0.9.2 as well, which seemed to be working in 0.9.4

Hello llvmdevs, In a function pass, I need to visit all the basic blocks in bottom-up order (the exact opposite of ReversePostOrderTraversal). I noticed some APIs like po_iterator but wasn't able to figure out an example usage for this on web. Any pointers/suggestions are highly appreciated. Thanks, Ananth -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I'm not really clear on the actual benefits of the TBD file, and why Apple migrated to them in the first place. Shouldn't a dynamic library containing only the relevant parts (e.g. the dynamic symbol table) be roughly comparable in size? And, much simpler to support? I assume that's effectively what "Mach-O Dynamic Library Stubs" actually _were_, before the introduction of

> On Apr 9, 2018, at 3:23 PM, James Y Knight via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I'm not really clear on the actual benefits of the TBD file, and why Apple migrated to them in the first place. Shouldn't a dynamic library containing only the relevant parts (e.g. the dynamic symbol table) be roughly comparable in size? And, much simpler to support? I assume

Hi, In continuation with my previous mail, I changed the vif entry in the config file as, vif = ["mac=00:16:3e:43:b7:99,bridge=xenbr0"] and I was able to boot into the guest, but I was not able to ping any system from the guest. I have attached the snapshot of the boot error messages. Thank you Regards Ananth -----Original Message----- From: CB, Anantha Padmanabhan Sent: Wednesday,

Was there any progress in the upstreaming effort? I'd be interested in having lld be able to link against tbd files, and I think it'd be cool if libtool -static could write tbd files (similar to thin archives on linux) since that should make archiving much faster. Juergen, maybe uploading your initial patch to phabricator instead of attaching might get more traction? On Wed, Apr 25, 2018

I have a question about setting up a samba BDC (with a samba PDC). I am running Samba as the PDC on a small network. Other Unix boxes on the network are running with: security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes update encrypted = Yes password server = 192.168.1.5 So they make use of the PDC for smbmount and smbsh applications. The W2K box also uses Samba at the PDC. I want to set up a Redhat

Great to hear, thanks! On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 1:56 PM Jake Ehrlich <jakehehrlich at google.com> wrote: > A member of my team +Armando Montanez <amontanez at google.com> is going to > drop a proposal for the ELF part of this soon (like sometime next week) and > will be working on the implementation. I'll be one of the reviewers for > anything that comes out of that so

Benifits of TBD: 1) It's human readable and diffs on TBDs correspond to changes in the ABI. Diffs can be automatically added to review processes to ensure that changes to the ABI are reviewed. The TBDs also document your precise ABI. 2) The size is smaller which means they can be shipped in an SDK instead of binaries to reduce the size of an SDK 3) Stubs are producible from TBDs (or should be)

Seems like there are a few of us interested in this then. I new around here and don't really know how decisions are made, so what's next? Just open a diff with the entire library?? John On 04/10/2018 05:33 PM, Jake Ehrlich wrote: > Benifits of TBD: > 1) It's human readable and diffs on TBDs correspond to changes in the > ABI. Diffs can be automatically added to review

Hi Juergen, At a minimum I think adding the support to libobject, etc so the various llvm tools can read or even write files from/for OSX should be fairly non-controversial so how about go ahead and do that first (I'll happily review if you'd like) and then we can go from there to do anything else with TAPI and llvm? Sound good? -eric On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:01 PM Juergen Ributzka via