similar to: ext4 and attributes, plus how to do reboots

Does rsync support acl and xattr (as with acl and user_xattr mount options)? I saw some acl patches for rsync, so probably it's not officially blessed yet. However, I didn't see any xattr patches - although some talks about it on the list go back into year 2003. So how it is with support for these? If I backup a Samba server, which has a filesystem mounted with acl,user_xattr (with

I think this is an NFS or ext4 question, but wanted to post this here for a sanity check. :) I've been searching for over a week for a solution and have turned up nil. I'm trying to rsync with options -AX over an NFSv4 mount TO an ext4 drive FROM an ext4 drive and both have acl and user_xattr enabled. The command: rsync -aAX /data/ /mnt/back/data results in: rsync:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Xattrs are not supported via NFS: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.nfs/53259 I would suggest letting rsync do the networking between the Linux systems (probably over ssh). This will also prevent you from being stuck in --whole-file. On 03/11/2015 09:41 AM, Andrew LaPierre wrote: > I think this is an NFS or ext4 question, but wanted to post

i have been playing with 3.3beta2 for a few weeks now and i can easily create inconsistencies between replicas. my first test was to start an rsync from a client using the gluster fuse code and then reboot one of the servers. after the rsync finishes, i can see that the replicas are out of sync (which is to be expected), so i start a self-heal via find. after that has run to completion, i

i (and others) have missed messages on centos-devel as well. did other people not see the 4.7 announcement message? i'm wondering if the centos list server is having some kind of issue.

Hi, after many VM crashes during upgrades of Gluster, losing network connectivity on one node etc. I would advise running replica 2 with arbiter. I once even managed to break this setup (with arbiter) due to network partitioning - one data node never healed and I had to restore from backups (it was easier and kind of non-production). Be extremely careful and plan for failure. -ps On Mon, Aug

I have extended attributes in my fstab set with the following options: /dv/md0 /mnt/raid ext4 auto,errors=remount-ro,user_xattr 0 2 Aside from the "user_xattr" flag, do I have to set any other options to save extended attribute or file permissions information correctly to my share? I am running Samba 3.4.7 under Ubuntu 10.04 server. Derek

Hi, I'm running the latest qa build of 3.3 and having a bit of trouble with extended attrs. [root at compute-0-0 ~]# rpm -qa | grep gluster glusterfs-geo-replication-3.3.0qa20-1 glusterfs-core-3.3.0qa20-1 glusterfs-rdma-3.3.0qa20-1 glusterfs-fuse-3.3.0qa20-1 Firstly, is it mandatory to mount ext3 file systems with 'user_xattr'? The issue I'm having is that I would like to delete

after this latest centos 5 kernel update, i am seeing 40 second delays on automount points. nothing in the rpm changelog looks obviously related to autofs and the autofs module seems to be the same as the previous kernel. i'm starting to do some strace'ing and other debugging, but nothing has jumped out at me yet. i'm hoping someone else has seen it so i know i'm not alone

Hi all, I have downloaded and installed the following: [root at compute-0-0 ~]# rpm -qa | grep gluster glusterfs-rdma-3.3beta2-1 glusterfs-fuse-3.3beta2-1 glusterfs-core-3.3beta2-1 I have also compiled all those from source but they didn't work either. The problem I'm having is that when I start glusterd I get the following and I'm not sure how to fix it: [2012-01-26

Hi all, I would like to ask if, and with how much success, you are using GlusterFS for virtual machine storage. My plan: I want to setup a 2-node cluster, where VM runs on the nodes themselves and can be live-migrated on demand. I have some questions: - do you use GlusterFS for similar setup? - if so, how do you feel about it? - if a node crashes/reboots, how the system re-syncs? Will the VM

while in firefox if i use arrow keys in text fields, it acts very oddly. starting at the beginning of the line it works fine for a few characters and then jumps to the end of the line. backarrow jumps backwards from the end of line to within a few chars of the beginning. anyone else seeing this?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello everyone, I been using CF cards for almost more then 7 years now with ext file-system without any major problems on ALIX boards. Last year I took 30 other systems in production with ext4 and the CF cards been dropping out pretty fast, it may have been a bad batch but I do want to look at it. I don't think the devices writes a lot of IO (is

i see one available in the repos, but i don't recall seeing any announcement about it. from googling, it does seem to be real, but still a bit disconcerting to not have an announcement about it.

sorry i figured this out after deleting the other parts of the thread. just run vino-preferences as the user who runs the main x display. it will have various options to enable and as soon as you do that you can get to hostname:0 via vnc. works quite well.

i've downloaded the new 2.6.9-34 kernel src rpm and keep getting signature issues or md5 issues if i tell rpm to ignore signatures. it seems that maybe the master copy is corrupted?

there doesn't seem to be a src.rpm for the newest kernel up on mirror.centos.org. i need to apply a local patch. is it the same as the upstream version? also, the centosplus unsupported version is either missing the -doc package or people need to know to do some manual intervention to get the regular version to replace the old unsupported version.

redhat did apply the opendesktop patch to build the iso8859-1 fonts, but then they forgot to rebuild the fonts-xorg package to pick them up. they have done some magic with how that happens such that you have to build the full xorg-x11 with a special %define set, and then go rpm2cpio stuff and tar that and blah blah blah. i am trying to work through this and i have whined at redhat again. and

Hi, I appologise if this totally irritates people as there seems to be quite a lot of info about this issue but a lot of it is quite old, for samba 2.x and kernels around 2.0 also. I have been beating my head against it for a little while - bumped into a dead end now ;( I am running centos-3 x86_64 (RH ES equiv) with samba 3.0.7-1 as the server, and OS2 as the client. Kernel is 2.4.21-20.EL.

Hello list, I've got a question from reading Using Samba 3rd, where it puts: ... the final permission is caculated by below filters in the order used by Samba: 1. Apply any DOS attribute mapping options << I take this as either map DOS attributes to execute bits, or store DOS attributes in extended attributes. Correct? 2. Apply the create mask settings 3. Apply the force