similar to: securing rsync backup solutions?

Hello everybody! Out of curiosity: What (backup) solutions do you use to let rsync store device files and ownership permissions without root privileges? I found out about "fakeroot" so far. Is there actually a practical use for the "--super" option? I didn't find anything as fakeroot doesn't need it... Additionally it would be a nice idea to refer to

On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 01:28:29AM +0900, Jun Koi wrote: > hi Richard, > > i am trying libguestfs 1.0.64, and have below errors at "make" step: > > make[2]: Entering directory > `/home/quynh/projects/libguestfs/libguestfs-1.0.64/appliance' > mv initramfs.fedora-11.i686.img initramfs.fedora-11.i686.img.bak > mv: cannot stat `initramfs.fedora-11.i686.img':

[was Re: [Nut-upsuser] Belkin USB UPSes] On 5/24/07, Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev at gmail.com> wrote: > Simply symlink debian to packaging/debian, and either "fakeroot > debian/rules binary" or whatever is your prefered method. I just noticed that if you use the "fakeroot debian/rules binary" method, the "ifeq (linux,$(DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS))" test is false,

Dear Arnaud, > guys, > > sorry for the lag in jumping over there. > You anyway do a good job! Thanks for prompt answers! > > If you want to do it yourself: > - look here for the needed build tools > http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ch-start.en.html#s-needprogs > - svn co svn://svn.debian.org/nut/trunk > - cd trunk > - ln -s packaging/debian > - fakeroot

Hi, If I have multiple kernel sources in /usr/src, e.g. linux-headers-2.6.26-1-686 linux-headers-2.6.26.custom.1 how does the Zaptel Makefile(?) know which one to pick? Is it a good approach to compile the kernel first and then compile Zaptel "manually" afterwards? Or should I rather put zaptel in /usr/src/modules and use fakeroot make-kpkg ... modules_image in the kernel

Package: xen-3 Version: 3.2.1-2 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... fakeroot debian/rules clean if [ -f debian/control ] && [ -f debian/control.md5sum ] && [ -f debian/rules.gen ]; then \ if md5sum debian/changelog

Source: xen Version: 4.0.1~rc3-1 Severity: serious From my pbuilder build log: ... fakeroot debian/rules clean if [ -f debian/control ] && [ -f debian/control.md5sum ] && [ -f debian/rules.gen ]; then \ if md5sum debian/changelog debian/bin/gencontrol.py debian/templates/control.hypervisor.in debian/templates/control.main.in debian/templates/control.source.in

Hi, I would like to know if there's a way of moving a fakeroot directory (that was created with winetools) and how to do it. I'd have to move it to another partition. Thanks, Dom -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-users/attachments/20050906/6ed9e893/attachment.htm

Sorry for messed up text. Here it goes again: I am learning to use the gsDesign package. I have a question about Pocock and OBF boundary. As far as I can understand, these 2 boundaries require equal spacing between interim analyses (maybe this is not correct?). But looks like I can still use gsDesign to run an analysis based on unequal spacing:? >

rrsync used to throw the error /usr/local/bin/rrsync: invalid rsync-command syntax or options when run under BackupPC 3.2.1, with this patch full and incremental backups work. --- support/rrsync | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/support/rrsync b/support/rrsync index 6f83f9d..c231ea3 100644 --- a/support/rrsync +++ b/support/rrsync @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ our

Hi: I installed Lucid Lynx amd64 on my system today, dual booted with Win 7. I've managed to install several packages through the Ubuntu Software Center with success and also installed texlive. Alas, installing my favorite software has not been so joyful. I went through the last few months of posts in this group to find something similar, but to no avail. After a couple of false starts, I

Hi. On all of my machines, except for a netbook cursed with the GMA500 chipset, the R packages are synced to lenny-cran. I have been using rpy in a chroot using the official lenny R packages (2.7.1) given that i have not been able to find compatible rpy deb packages to work with lenny-cran. I am able to build the rpy deb package from source in a 32-bit lenny chroot (with the stock R packages)

Hi, I am learning to use your gsDesign package!?I have a question about Pocock and OBF boundary. As far as Iunderstand, these 2 boundaries require equal spacing between interim analyses(maybe this is not correct?). But I can still use gsDesign to run an analysisbased on unequal spacing:?gsDesign(k=2,test.type=2,timing=c(0.75,1),alpha=0.05,sfu='Pocock')Symmetrictwo-sided group sequential

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11879 Bug ID: 11879 Summary: escape rrsync restricted folder Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter:

Still failed. The first secret is in your email program settings, to use Plain Text format (at least for emails you send to this mailing list). The second secret tool to use is the reprex package to let you verify that your code example will do on our computers what it is doing on your computer before you send it to us. That will also involve giving us some sample data or referencing some data

> On 23 Sep 2017, at 01:32, array chip via R-help <r-help at r-project.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am learning to use your gsDesign package! I have a question about Pocock and OBF boundary. As far as Iunderstand, these 2 boundaries require equal spacing between interim analyses(maybe this is not correct?). But I can still use gsDesign to run an analysisbased on unequal

Hello-- I've been trying to build libguestfs 1.2.14 with the appliance enabled on an older type of system at my company. Getting all the required dependencies installed has been an arduous process, but I've finally hit an obstacle I don't know how to get around. The final output of "make": + febootstrap-run initramfs -- /sbin/depmod -a ABOUT-NLS BUGS COPYING COPYING.LIB

Hi all, is it possible to get rrsync with the "--delete" option working? Or is the rsync server really started unidirectional in this special scenario? Regards. JS -- GRATIS f?r alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01

On 12/03/2014 01:37:58 PM, Kevin Korb wrote: > As far as a backup provider goes I wouldn't expect them to use rsync > over SSL unless that were built into rsync in the future (and has > been > around long enough that most users would have it). > > I would expect them to either use rsync over ssh secured by rrsync or > rsyncd over ssh with them managing the rsyncd.conf

from a security perspective this is bad. think of a backup provider who wants to make rsyncd modules available to the end users so they can push backups to the server. do you think that such server is secure if all users are allowed to open up an ssh shell to secure their rsync transfer ? ok, you can restrict the ssh connection, but you open up a hole and you need to think twice to make it secure