similar to: dovecot / postfix mail bounce problem

Hi all, we are able to observe a very strange behaviour: User A wants to copy a mail to a shared mailbox of user B. This works like a charme if the quota of user A is lower than the used space of user B. But is the used space of user B higher than the quota size of User A, "User A" is not longer able to copy the message to the shared folder of user B. His IMAP Client says something

asterisk-1.8.13.0 iksemel-1.4 I have a client who setup a gvoice account using their domain in the login name: username=client at theirdomain@gmail.com This appears to have caused a problem with authentication. I've tried escaping the @ and quoting the login string, etc. but it simply won't authenticate. I don't believe my configuration is bad as the same server /

I'm soooo close, but this last little thing is eluding me... I have the following Sieve rule in my global sieve rule: require ["fileinto"]; # Move spam to spam folder if header :contains "X-Spam-Flag" "YES" { fileinto "Junk"; stop; } This isn't firing. The .Junk folder exists under the user directories, but messages that have the

Hello, I just migrated from Postfix/Courier/Maildrop to Postfix/Dovecot/Deliver/Sieve and don't unterstand the right syntax for sieve :( I searched and found many small examples and many links to the RFC, but nothing was usefull for me (or i didn't unterstand it) I installed the latest Dovecot-Sieve (hg). Examples from my maildrop config: # Filter FROM if($E =~ /name at domain1\.tld/)

Hi, I?ve got the following problem: When accessing a share on a Samba server from Win2000 or Windows XP this fails. The access is denied. All the shares are visible within ...\Network Neighbourhood\Workgroup\Chs-server.chs.\share1 ...\Network Neighbourhood\Workgroup\Chs-server.chs.\share2 ... ...\Network Neighbourhood\Workgroup\Chs-server.chs.\Drucker und Faxdienste Besides this I see the

Hello, Below an unusual message. My gut feeling says "allow .efi", but haven't done further research. Posted here for creating awareness that E-mail exchange is not as smooth as usual. Good night Geert Stappers one of the people behind the mailinglist ----- Forwarded message from mailman-bounces at zytor.com ----- Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:36:03 -0700 From: mailman-bounces at

wohoo, so if I unterstand it correctly with that patch early media video works over the Asterisk server? In other words the Asterisk server get's able to (process/)forward the early media video stream with that patch? 2018-04-09 17:57 GMT+02:00 Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com>: > On Mon, Apr 9, 2018, at 12:04 PM, Benjamin Marty wrote: > > My understanding based on Wireshark

Looks like there''s enough interest in runnels that it''s time to create a list: https://mail.madstop.com/mailman/listinfo/runnels-dev -- Risk! Risk anything! Care no more for the opinions of others, for those voices. Do the hardest thing on earth for you. Act for yourself. Face the truth. -- Katherine Mansfield

Hi, I was wondering if anyone has seen (or completed) an effect to make something ''bounce'' like icons do in the OS X dock when you launch them? Something that looks like there''s a bit of gravitational behavior to it? Thanks, Trevor Trevor Squires http://somethinglearned.com

------- Forwarded Message From: Jesse Hammons <jessehammons@yahoo.com> Reply-To: jhammons@alumni.princeton.edu Subject: VBR encoding in ogglame? To: vorbis@xiph.org Cc: vorbis-dev@xiph.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hello, I ran a little test where I encoded an audio file at a bunch of different data rates. The results are here:

I have received the below notice about the rsync list. There is a worm among us. ------- Forwarded message follows ------- Return-Path: <postmaster@innevi.com> Received: from bleep.innevi.com ([64.30.26.9]) by mail.dubois-king.COM (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i1K7n3p14977 for <ppalumbo@dubois-king.com>; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 02:49:03 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain;

Any one has any idea why am I being bounced by llvm-commits? My email is not bouncing... :/ -- cheers, --renato http://systemcall.org/ Reclaim your digital rights, eliminate DRM, learn more at http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm

On Apr 13, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > Any one has any idea why am I being bounced by llvm-commits? > > My email is not bouncing... :/ Hi Renato, Please email llvm-admin for these sorts of questions, thanks! -Chris

From: Howard Williams <howielin at home.com> Reply-To: howielin at home.com To: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org Subject: Can't log in via ssh As far as I can tell, I performed a basic configuration properly, but I get an error I can't understand Can you help? Here's my session: SSH Version OpenSSH-1.2.2, protocol version 1.5. Compiled with SSL. debug: Reading configuration

Content-Description: Undelivered Message From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at lkcl.net> To: Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> Cc: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org, pam-list at redhat.com, SE-Linux <selinux at tycho.nsa.gov>, hartmans at debian.org Subject: Re: Debian / SE/Linux - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=193664 Mail-Followup-To: Damien Miller

Hi Srivatsa, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on vhost/linux-next] [also build test ERROR on xen-tip/linux-next linus/master v5.7-rc3 next-20200428] [cannot apply to swiotlb/linux-next] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the base

On Tue, 28 Apr 2020, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > For better security, its desirable that a guest VM's memory is > not accessible to any entity that executes outside the context of > guest VM. In case of virtio, backend drivers execute outside the > context of guest VM and in general will need access to complete > guest VM memory. One option to restrict the access provided to

On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 10:22:32AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: > On 2020/4/29 4:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:19:52PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > > > * Michael S. Tsirkin<mst at redhat.com> [2020-04-28 12:17:57]: > > > > > > > Okay, but how is all this virtio specific? For example, why not allow > > > >

On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 03:14:10PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > * Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> [2020-04-29 02:50:41]: > > > So it seems that with modern Linux, all one needs > > to do on x86 is mark the device as untrusted. > > It's already possible to do this with ACPI and with OF - would that be > > sufficient for achieving what this

On 29.04.20 12:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 03:39:53PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: >> That would still not work I think where swiotlb is used for pass-thr devices >> (when private memory is fine) as well as virtio devices (when shared memory is >> required). > > So that is a separate question. When there are multiple untrusted >