similar to: calculating correlation coefficients on repeated measures

Dear list, I have a dataset where we sampled multiple individuals either 1 or 9 times. Our measurement variable is 'Delta13C' (see below sample dataset). I cannot figure out how to efficiently use a vector command (preferably) or a loop to create a new vector of the names of the individuals sampled 9 times. Note that the 'FeatherPosition' variable will only be "P1" for

Dear all, I would like to conduct a Pearson's correlation using cor.test separately for each individual in my data set. Each individual has nine observations of the measurement variable 'Delta13C'. I can figure our how to do it manually one 'Individual_ID' at a time, but I cannot figure out how to automate the process (a loop I am guessing). In addition, I would like to

Dear list, The below dataset and code creates a new dataset with the results from the function cor.test being performed on each individual ('Individual_ID') from my original dataset. How do I convert each variable from the cor.test results to a numeric data type, as it is passed into the new dataframe? For example, 'estimate', 'p.value', and 'conf.int' should be

I have a list of observations of individuals. I would like to make a list of individuals, with a data frame of observations for each individual. The following code usually works, but not always ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # Make a list of empty data frames animals = list() indivs = levels(Z$individual_id) donotprint <- sapply(indivs, function(i){

Hello R users, Doing My PhD I collected count data which I believe is zero inflated. I have run a statistical model with lmer and family=poisson and got summary(model)@sigma=1 so I believe there is no overdispertion. I would like to use the fmr function from the 'gnlm' library but I just cannot figure out from the examples in the help page and some forums out there how to convert the lmer

Hi All I am trying to translate a proc mixed into a lme() syntax. It seems that I was able to do it for part of the model, but a few things are still different. It is a 2-level bivariate model (some call it a pseudo-3-level model). PROC MIXED DATA=psdata.bivar COVTEST METHOD = ml; CLASS cluster_ID individual_id variable_id ; MODEL y = Dp Dq / SOLUTION NOINT; RANDOM Dp Dq / SUBJECT = cluster_ID

Hi All, I'm trying to run a simulation of host-pathogen evolution based around individuals. What I need to have is a dataframe or table of some description - describing all the individuals of a pathogen population (so far I've implemented this as a matrix): ID No_of_Effectors Effectors (Sequences) [1,] 0001 3 ## 3

Dear List, i am trying to produce a 3d plot using wireframe using the code: wireframe(Residuals_FD ~ Elevation * Temperature, data = data2, scales = list(arrows = FALSE), drape = TRUE, colorkey = TRUE) As you can see when the code (using the data below) is run the plot area is set-up correctly but the actual surface is missing? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Chris #data Elevation

R Help - I'm trying to run a correlation matrix with a covariate of "age" and will at some point will also want to covary other variables concurrently. I'm using the "psych" package and have tried other methods such as writing a loop to extract semi-partial correlations, but it does not seem to be working. How can I accomplish this? library(psych) > set.cor(y =

On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 04:16:29PM -0800, Michael Dalton wrote: > Commit 2613af0ed18a ("virtio_net: migrate mergeable rx buffers to page frag > allocators") changed the mergeable receive buffer size from PAGE_SIZE to > MTU-size, introducing a single-stream regression for benchmarks with large > average packet size. There is no single optimal buffer size for all >

On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 04:16:29PM -0800, Michael Dalton wrote: > Commit 2613af0ed18a ("virtio_net: migrate mergeable rx buffers to page frag > allocators") changed the mergeable receive buffer size from PAGE_SIZE to > MTU-size, introducing a single-stream regression for benchmarks with large > average packet size. There is no single optimal buffer size for all >