similar to: CESA-2011:1821 Moderate CentOS 6 pidgin Update

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:1102 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1102.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 5b595bb9e6d5741172cd47e6de5faa275c73f58d4a71bd68127db404b45c6493 finch-2.7.9-5.el6.2.i686.rpm

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

I use "virsh pool-define rbd.xml" to create a rbd storage pool,but get this error virsh pool-define /tmp/rbd.xml error: Failed to define pool from /tmp/rbd.xml error: internal error: missing backend for pool type 8 rbd.xml <pool type="rbd"> <name>cloudstack</name> <source> <name>cloudstack</name> <host

As much as I hate to be the bearer of news, I saw over 400 updates this morning on my upstream 6.1 box.... checking the upstream website, yeah, EL6.2 is out, at least for updates. I didn't see ISO's in my subscribed channel yet, though. I figured someone would notice soon enough. So before anyone goes into flame mode, think about the difficulties that have faced the CentOS developers in

we recently deployed some large XFS file systems with centos 6.2 used as NFS servers... I've had some reports of a problem similar to the one reported here... http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/red-hat-31/xfs-inode64-nfs-export-no_subtree_check-and-stale-nfs-file-handle-message-855844/ these reports are somewhat vague (third indirectly reported via internal corporate channels from

Update me Richie, Meanwhile, I've booted the server in latest kernel, Its still not working for me. 2015-03-17 0:54 GMT+05:30 Thirumalai Nambi <thirumalai.sandy@gmail.com>: > > libtool-2.2.6-15.5.el6.x86_64 > upstart-0.6.5-13.el6_5.3.x86_64 > atmel-firmware-1.3-7.el6.noarch > redhat-rpm-config-9.0.3-42.el6.centos.noarch > plymouth-scripts-0.8.3-27.el6.centos.1.x86_64

I have a large raid (lsi megaraid sas2 9261-8i card) and when I use parted to initialize it as the one big partition I want, it gives me a warning. # parted /dev/sda "mklabel gpt" Warning: The existing disk label on /dev/sda will be destroyed and all data on this disk will be lost. Do you want to continue? Yes/No? yes # parted -a optimal /dev/sda

For those who don't follow the QA RSS, see: http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/node/120 to get the latest info on the status of 6.2. Looks good so far!

Seems to only write the first block, or with some clients only a zero length file. Perms are obviously not an issue if at least one block can be written? Anyone know what might give? Thanks, jlc

Hi all, I've just migrated my mail system from procmail to managesieve/sieve and I'm having trouble trying to duplicate a could of rules I used to use in my procmail config. One particular rule would be this: :0 Wfh * ^Sender: owner-scientific-linux-devel at LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV | (sed -e '/^Subject:/ s/\[SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL\] *//g'| sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/Precedence:

libtool-2.2.6-15.5.el6.x86_64 upstart-0.6.5-13.el6_5.3.x86_64 atmel-firmware-1.3-7.el6.noarch redhat-rpm-config-9.0.3-42.el6.centos.noarch plymouth-scripts-0.8.3-27.el6.centos.1.x86_64 patchutils-0.3.1-3.1.el6.x86_64 bc-1.06.95-1.el6.x86_64 cscope-15.6-6.el6.x86_64 coreutils-8.4-37.el6.x86_64 ncurses-devel-5.7-3.20090208.el6.x86_64 libselinux-utils-2.0.94-5.8.el6.x86_64

I get the following error message every time I run R. I am on an Intel Mac, Mac OS X, 10.4.8: 2006-12-08 16:59:40.564 R[1821] *** -[NSBundle load]: Error loading code /Users/michael/Library/InputManagers/Smart Crash Reports/Smart Crash Reports.bundle/Contents/MacOS/Smart Crash Reports for bundle / Users/michael/Library/InputManagers/Smart Crash Reports/Smart Crash Reports.bundle, error

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1821 Summary: Public part of authorized user credentials cannot be exposed within session Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.6p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: sshd

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1821 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |djm at mindrot.org Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1821 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Close all resolved bugs after 7.3p1 release

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:1821 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1821.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 80ff871f6c19feceac33011557da23d1a4ebb91acfdca8f0bc464d3376f0babd ccs-0.16.2-69.el6_5.1.i686.rpm

Hi All, I a working on configuring a not-quite minimal installation of CentOS 6.2. I tried doing the "minimal" installation available with the installer, but it's a bit too minimal to be useful. So I'm cutting down from a less minimal starting place. I'm pretty familiar with 5.x, but what I'm finding in 6.2 is a lot of new stuff, and a lot of odd behavior. For example,

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:0139 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0139.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 54cd22cf339e22a28301695c9be011921cc5541ccb77264214b7998297cf2b0d finch-2.7.9-27.el6.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0646 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0646.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: c652795fb86cece54b9927a3daa6710a486b3b142f4fbe76dff568c31fa858e2 finch-2.7.9-10.el6_4.1.i686.rpm