similar to: Will CentOS 6.1 still be supported?

Can we get the people who normally translate the Release Notes started on the current version of the notes for 6.1? Here is the current version ... I am getting ready to add the CDs and the sha1sums soon, everything else should be fairly stable in there. http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.1 Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was

Hi We use mrepo to keep a local repository. I downloaded the CentOS6.1 iso and used that as the base. We also have the CR repo added. I was expecting this change to cause no issues but the following packages have version issues between the base 6.1 and the CR repo:- base version CR version dbus-libs-1.2.24-4.el6_0.x86_64 dbus-libs-1.2.24-5.el6_1.x86_64

Hi Folks, I've inherited an old RH7 system that I'd like to upgrade to CentOS6.1 by means of wiping it clean and doing a fresh install. However, the system has a software raid setup that I wish to keep untouched as it has data on that I must keep. Or at the very least, TRY to keep. If all else fails, then so be it and I'll just recreate the thing. I do plan on backing up

We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of CentOS-6.1 install media for i386 and x86_64 Architectures. Release Notes for 6.1 are availble at http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.1 - we recommend everyone looks through those once. CentOS-6.1 is based on the upstream release EL 6.1 and includes packages from all variants. All upstream repositories have been combined

We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of CentOS-6.1 install media for i386 and x86_64 Architectures. Release Notes for 6.1 are availble at http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.1 - we recommend everyone looks through those once. CentOS-6.1 is based on the upstream release EL 6.1 and includes packages from all variants. All upstream repositories have been combined

Hello all, I am having some problems with the group policies in a small (~10 pc's) AD. I have set up Samba and i used a NAS for saving home folders and policies. I then had to replace the NAS and i used a new ip for the new NAS. For the last step i changed the ip of the redirected folders in the policy in order to point all pc's to the new NAS. It seems the policies are not applied

Hello! let: test<-1:3 list(test) names(test)<-c("X11","X12","Y23") >test[["Y2"]] 3 I had assumed that the names in a list are like a keys in a hash. Therefore i thought that no value should be returned. The behavior of: >test["Y2"] <NA> NA is as i expected. Should it be as it is? How is the definition of [[]] and []?

I am considering building a pair of storage servers that will be using CentOS and GFS to share the storage from a Coraid (SATA+Raid) EtherDrive shelf. Has anyone else tried such a setup? Is GFS stable enough to use in a production environment? There is a build of GFS 6.1 at http://rpm.karan.org/el4/csgfs/. Has anyone used this? Is it stable? Will I run into any problems if I use CentOS 3.5

On Mon, 27 Mar 2023 23:25:49 -0700 John Hubbard <jhubbard at nvidia.com> wrote: > On the patch process, I see that this applies to linux-stable's 6.1.y > branch. I'd suggest two things: > > 1) Normally, what I've seen done is to post against either the current > top of tree linux.git, or else against one of the mm-stable branches. > And then after it's

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

Hello, When I add "server signing = mandatory" to my smb.conf file (AIX V6.1, 6100-04-11-1140 running Samba v3.6.5) that has "encrypt passwords = no", my windows client no longer can connect. It fails with system error 64. The windows system is running XP vers 2002 with service pack 3. The security settings are set to: Microsoft network client: Digitally sign communications

I have a server that frequently hangs while rebooting. I see no errors, but during the boot process it stops at this stage: Initializing hardware... storage network audio The cursor sits just after the word "audio" and I have to do a hard reset to get out of it. This server has no audio capabilities, so I am thinking that I just need to disable the audio stuff so it doesn't

Hi all, Somebody knows when RHCS for CentOS 4 will be out??? -- CL Martinez carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com

I have a backup spooling onto a DLT drive. Is there any tool that will let me monitor the data throughput on the device? -- Bowie

Hello, Has anyone had a chance to review this question? Thank you, Bill ----- Forwarded by Bill Chockla/Durham/Contr/IBM on 09/26/2012 10:04 AM ----- From: Bill Chockla/Durham/Contr/IBM To: samba at samba.org, Date: 09/10/2012 12:52 PM Subject: Connection fails with Server/Client Signing = Mandatory Hello, When I add "server signing = mandatory" to my smb.conf file (AIX V6.1,

The QA web site at http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/blog was really helpful for those of us who were curious as to how CentOS 6.0 was coming along. However, there doesn't seem to be much information as to how CentOS 6.1 is going from either the QA web site, the forums (Announcements), or Kananbir's twitter feed -- but it may be I'm just not looking in the right place. Does the QA

One of my CentOS boxes has started giving me errors. The box is CentOS-4.4 (i386) fully updated. It has a pair of SATA drives in a software raid 1 configuration. The errors I see are: ata1: command 0xca timeout, stat 0x50 host_stat 0x24 ata1: status=0x50 { DriveReady SeekComplete } Info fld=0x1e22b8, Current sda: sense key No Sense ata2: command 0xca timeout, stat 0x50

I have two identical servers. The only difference is that the first one has Maxtor 250G drives and the second one has Seagate 320G drives. OS: CentOS-4.4 (fully patched) CPU: dual Opteron 280 Memory: 16GB Raid card: 3ware 9550Sx-8LP Raid volume: 4-disk Raid 5 with NCQ and Write Cache enabled On the first server I have decent performance. Nothing spectacular, but good enough. The second one

I have two identical servers. The only difference is that the first one has Maxtor 250G drives and the second one has Seagate 320G drives. OS: CentOS-4.4 (fully patched) CPU: dual Opteron 280 Memory: 16GB Raid card: 3ware 9550Sx-8LP Raid volume: 4-disk Raid 5 with NCQ and Write Cache enabled On the first server I have decent performance. Nothing spectacular, but good enough. The second one

Hi, i''ve been experimentating with dynamicCSS.js [1] to hide content only if JavaScript is enabled. It works pretty well and fires before onload to avoid the flash of visible content. Now i''m wondering if there is a Prototype way of doing this. [1] http://www.bobbyvandersluis.com/articles/dynamicCSS.php My main problem is that Prototype functions like Element.toggle() do