similar to: Migrate Users from existing Samba4 Domain?

I have been doing some work with the new Samba4 version and have some questions. Is this the right list to ask on, or is there a development list that would be better? (I am currently following the Samba4 HOWTO Wiki at: http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO, and building from the "git" repository. The system seems to be working well, but I have some questions about migrating

I'm not sure if this is an LDAP issue, a Samba issue, a BSD issue or a FreeNAS issue... I'm working at migrating a large block of file shares from an aging CentOS/Samba 3.0.9 server to a FreeNAS (8.0.2) server. (The FreeNAS box is running FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p3 and Samba 3.5.11.) I will eventually be migrating the entire domain and user base off of that server, but for the time being, I

Version 4.0.0alpha18-GIT-e75c436 Ubuntu 11.10 Built now with make clean ./configure.developer make make install samba -i -d3 gives this: ldb: unable to stat module ${PREFIX}/modules/ldb : No such file or directory ldb_wrap open of privilege.ldb samba: using 'standard' process model Unknown process model 'standard' my $PREFIX should be /usr/local/samba I think. The path is

hi, ? i am very new to samba and have run into an issue with setting up directory/file permissions. ? i have a nfs share on redhat 6 linux server that a group of users will share. basically each user will run their own respective jobs and save the logs in this share. my issue is that? all of the users are able to delete each others files, which i do not want ? can somebody please help me setup

Is : samba-dsdb-modules Installed ? dpkg-query -s samba-dsdb-modules |grep Status Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Csorba R?bert via samba > Verzonden: maandag 20 juli 2020 13:29 > Aan: Rowland penny; samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Migrate GPO policies does not work

Hi, I migrated from my the main domain controller.I use Centos 7 server with tranquilrepository. The destination server is a test enviorement with different domain name but the same system specifications. I can browse the sysvol network share without any problem. If i want to check the sam.ldb file on the test server I got these errors. WARNING:Module [samba_dsdb] not found - do you need to

Hi, I successfully migrated my GPO policies in a new installation of domain controller. After I joined a Windows 10 machine to the domain the gpupdate /force command printed this errors all of my policies. filtering not applied (empty) On the server side everything looks fine. I checked the tdb files under the /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/ folder. The

I'm running Fedora14 on all machines, including my wife's -- and I'm the nearest (distant) thing there is to tech support. She's far more likely to outlive me than I her; so I want to install something requiring a lot less maintenance on her machine, so that she'll have it and be used to it, years ahead of need. I'm thinking CentOS 6, whenever it's ready, is

Perhaps you could add a warm-start to the AEC, such that the parameters start near the correct values on all but the first use? Stuart On 05/25/2011 08:22 AM, Andras Kadinger wrote: > 2011.05.25. 4:52 keltez?ssel, Arun Raghavan ?rta: >> On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 11:09 -0400, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >>> The fact that the AEC takes a few seconds to converge is normal. The >> Do

Hi! Sorry my late answer. I did run the sysvolcheck/reset commands and everything seems fine. On my server I use the following rpm packages, installed from the tranquil.it repository. ldb-tools.x86_64 2.0.10-1.el7?????????????????? @samba_custom libldb.x86_64?????????????????????? 2.0.10-1.el7 @samba_custom libldb-devel.x86_64???????????????? 2.0.10-1.el7 @samba_custom

> Yes, you are not forced to reset the AEC between calls at all, if you > can assume the actual echo path (physical environment) will not change > much, you can keep the instance and continue using it for the next call. > > Also what we did was keep the AEC running between calls - but we had a > rather high-duty system with sounds and signals played between calls, so > the AEC

Hi there, I use this rsync command to backup "/" of a remote server: rsync -Hav --delete --exclude-from=backup.excludes --delete-excluded -e "ssh -p 45658" root at samwise:/ /mnt/backup/samwise/backup Where: samwise: is the name of the server (yes yes, I know, naming computer after Hobbits may be considered bad form) 45685 is the port samwise is listening on for ssh. I

I have a recorded conversation from an analog trunk. As usual one side is stronger that the other one. In my case, the gap between signal levels are even bigger. How does speex AGC preprocessor will perform on this type of audio recording? Maybe I am wrong and AGC is not really what I need to equalize the two persons in my phone conversation? As I Understand, AGC will perform better if each

On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 11:09 -0400, Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > The fact that the AEC takes a few seconds to converge is normal. The Do you think there might be a way to reduce this? > fact that it needs to completely re-converge in the middle of a call > probably indicates that something went "wrong" in the audio > capture/playback. For example, that could be an

Solved: Seems that, as long as you put the "Login script" in the correct place under the Sysvol volume, in AD it needs to be specified as JUST the name of the script. (You know, the irony of working with all this wonderful Samba4 stuff is that I actually end up having to learn more about administering WINDOWS! Sheesh! ;-) On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Charles Tryon

________________________________ From: Uday Mhatre<mailto:uday_mhatre at hotmail.com> Sent: ?05-?12-?2014 12:58 To: Andrea Venturoli<mailto:ml at netfence.it> Subject: RE: [Samba] samba 2.2.7a tech issue Just wondering if these samba versions are backward compatible with fedora14 and other Linux distributions. Regards, Uday ________________________________ From: Uday

Hello, A windows XP machine 'X' (the only one left in the LAN) sees all fedora14/samba3 shares on f14 machine 'A' but cannot see fedora20/samba4 shares on machines 'B' or 'C'. 'X' can ping all of the others by name, and all of the others 'A', 'B' and 'C' CAN see ALL of the other shares INCLUDING on the XP machine 'X'.

Since I don't seem to be having any luck with the classicupgrade, I decided to try starting from scratch and then adding users. I ran the command: /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool domain provision --realm=<my realm> \ --domain=<mydomain> --adminpass 'mypass' --server-role=dc \ --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ Then I tried both adding and changing users. In neither case can I

Hi Andras, others, Andras Kadinger <bandit <at> surfnonstop.com> writes: > > > Daniel, > I recommend you to start from a simple case and gradually progress > towards your goal. > Can you make things work with the "Speex in a Disco" (Example 6) > testcase at http://ns.surfnonstop.com/~bandit/speex/echocard1/ ? > These files

Hello, I work for the company Smartjog (http://smatjog.com/) where we use a modified version of Icecast. We would like to contribute back those patchs, and hopefully have them merged in the official repository. I have posted them on the patch tracker, so feel free to leave a comment on them. Some of those patch are based on the work done by Niv Sardi (see