similar to: Static server side listing

A bit late, but someone (anonymous) provided a link to download. the md5 is correct, it matches the last sourceforge state. And the md5 and sha256 mentioned at https://www.itefix.no/i2/node/12862 - before he gave up the project. MD5 c787dfa854775793d1a1b5c3502b57b5 sha256 5abeec588e937bd749456ddb347e4116b0f8407e15f412281fc64c763d1de62d For obvious reasons you should check the md5 / sha256 after

I came across this thread from a couple years ago: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-November/119346.html Has there been any progress on RDF for X86? Or is there some other preferred alternative for performing reachability analysis after register allocation? Thanks, Scott Constable -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Do you know whether it has been fixed on the 8.0.1 release? Scott On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 9:45 AM Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at quicinc.com<mailto:kparzysz at quicinc.com>> wrote: The one blocking issue that existed in the past has been fixed. I haven’t had time to do any work on it lately, but I’m not aware of any fundamental problems that would make it not work on x86. --

I hopethis hope this makes sense. How do you make rsync run even when not physically connected to the server? In other words, I run rsync from the terminal via vnc and when I log out of the connection, rsync stops running. Is there a script or something I can use? Sent from my iPhone

Ubuntu 20.04, Dovecot 2.3.7.2, SpamProbe v1.4d. For the past weeks my sieve filters that call spamprobe have been crashing out for some users. I have a dozen similar server setups and this is not happening on any of the other servers and it was working just fine for a year up until recently. This particular server is quite busy. There is plenty of disk space and inode usage is about 2.5%.

Hi Scott, Sorry for the late reply, I was out of office during the holidays. 1. A def node can reach either a use node, or another def node. In the highlighted phi node (p3224), the def (d3225) reaches another def (1598) in statement (s1597), that’s why it’s needed. 2. The reason why the def of R11 in s1578 is not connected directly to the use in s1725 is that there may be an intervening

Hi Scott, That #1073741833 is a register mask. They are treated as aggregate registers (essentially sets of registers), so if it includes R9D and R11D, it will be treated as being aliased with both. These separate defs are there because they reach disjoint registers. -- Krzysztof Parzyszek kparzysz at quicinc.com<mailto:kparzysz at quicinc.com> AI tools development From: Scott

Hi   I am running a web server in one of my xen guests. Using ab as a load generating tool i have collected some throughput data for different file sizes like 5KB, 10KB and 100KB. One thing that i have noticed strange here is throughput drops down in a virtual http server, it happends in case of 5KB and 10KB files. Also it takes longer to run tests in virtual environment. Doc Size

Hi   I am running a web server in one of my xen guests. Using ab as a load generating tool i have collected some throughput data for different file sizes like 5KB, 10KB and 100KB. One thing that i have noticed strange here is throughput drops down in a virtual http server, it happends in case of 5KB and 10KB files. Also it takes longer to run tests in virtual environment. Doc Size

I currently use Ubuntu 20.04 with Dovecot 2.3.7.2 and OpenSSL 1.1.1f. A few months ago there was an update to all these systems and since then I've had to talk W7 and old Mac clients through disabling ports 993/995 with TLS enabled back to ports 143/110 without SSL or they could not pick up email. Thunderbird users (ie; me) were unaffected. Could anyone share a set of port 993/995 SSL

On 06 Jul 2020, at 20:30, Mark Constable <markc at renta.net> wrote: > you could try disabling SSL/STARTTLS on port 143. What? I?ve never seen SSL/StARTTLS on port 143,a dn I doubt that would work? -- Rumour is information distilled so finely that it can filter through anything. It does not need doors and windows -- sometimes it does not need people. It can exist free and wild, running

On Tue Jul 07 2020 02:07:08 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Mark Constable <markc at renta.net> wrote: > FWIW I meant if the client is Windows7/old-Outlook then changing either > 993/SSL or 143/STARTTLS to 143/NONE could help pick up the mail. We had > to do this for a 100 or so clients a few months ago after upgrading to > Ubuntu 20.04. Really, really bad idea. You just

On 16/7/20 5:54 am, Benny Pedersen wrote: >>> FWIW I meant if the client is Windows7/old-Outlook then changing >>> either 993/SSL or 143/STARTTLS to 143/NONE could help pick up the >>> mail. > > windows 7 just need tls 1.0, why its need to disabled all, is as well > beyong me, do not disable tls 1.0 in dovecot aslong one have windows > 7 clients Would anyone

Forgive me if this has been addressed here before. We have a remote office that we need to backup to our NAS. We have a site to site certificate VPN. The remote site has over 51gb that needs to be backed up to our NAS over that VPN. I have tried this command: rsync --verbose --progress --stats --compress --recursive --times --perms --links --delete /Share/* /

I want to supply separate Letsencrypt certificates for each virtual domain and seeing that SNI does not work I need to allocate separate IPs. Could anyone give some pointers, or keywords to search for, on... a) how to make dovecot listen for different domains on different IPs? b) how to configure separate SSL certs for each of these IPs?

Perhaps I have not looked hard enough but is it possible to get at the current users auth userdb "home" (or $HOME) variable from inside a sieve script? Example?

On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 01:45:06AM +0300, Sami Ketola wrote: > > > > On 7. Jul 2020, at 0.48, The Doctor <doctor at doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote: > > > > Got a client that usually uses Outlook I think 2010. This person tends to move > > their e-mails to certain folers. On Thunderbird, the move shows. > > Not on Outlook. > > > > Any

Dear Community, sorry for the somewhat dumb question. Maybe someone has any pointer to how to setup the RED queue to mark pakets with ECN. In particular what are appropriate parameter settings for limit, min, max, etc. All my trials end up with either "RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument", although the command line (at least for me) looks fine in regard to what is said on the

So the short summary of my problem is, the batch file rsync creates is HUGE for a very small change. The idea is to create workstation image with partimage, update it with some software and send the image update diff over the wire to a large number of destinations over a satellite link, but the batch file updates are several orders of magnitude too large. I don't know exactly how partimage

Am 07.07.2020 um 08:07 schrieb Mark Constable: > > FWIW I meant if the client is Windows7/old-Outlook then changing either > 993/SSL or 143/STARTTLS to 143/NONE could help pick up the mail. We had > to do this for a 100 or so clients a few months ago after upgrading to > Ubuntu 20.04. Curious, what's the rationale behind that move? Is it because that old beast of Outlook does