similar to: Bind9 dlopen version

I removed the centos bind build and installed bind 9.9.3 from ISC source, and went to /usr/local/samba/private/named.conf and changed the line from bind 9.8 to bind 9.9 and now I get this error and named will not start with the include line for samba in /etc/named.conf: get: "dlz_dlopen: incorrect version 2 should be 1 in '/usr/local/samba/lib/bind9/dlz_bind9_9.so'" Help!

I've just installed samba4 beta 7 with defaults and everything went OK. As I download bind9.9.1 tarball and compiled it I had to follow steve's advice: to declare we'll be using DLZ_DLOPEN_VERSION 2 in /samba-master/source4/dns_server/dlz_minimal.h /*#ifdef BIND_VERSION_9_8 #define DLZ_DLOPEN_VERSION 1 #else #define DLZ_DLOPEN_VERSION 2 #endif */ #define DLZ_DLOPEN_VERSION 2 I

i want to use bind 9.11beta2 version. I do not see bind9_11.so Best regards cat /usr/local/samba/private/named.conf # This DNS configuration is for BIND 9.8.0 or later with dlz_dlopen support. # # This file should be included in your main BIND configuration file # # For example with # include "/usr/local/samba/private/named.conf"; # # This configures dynamically loadable zones (DLZ)

Hi list! I follow the Samba 4 HOWTO on Ubuntu 10.04, git ok make ok make install ok make ok (needed for provision to work, even though i use the installed provision) /usr/local/samba/sbin/provision --realm=samdom.example.com --domain=SAMDOM --adminpass=SOMEPASSWORD --server-role='domain controller' ok added "domain samdom.example.com" to resolv.conf When starting Bind 9.9.0b1

I installed Bind9 on a new ubuntu 13.04 server using apt-get install bind9 and am trying to integrate AD into it. Bind starts fine and will resolve my domain and computer names, but when I add the line include "/usr/local/samba/private/named.conf" into /etc/bind/named.conf, Bind9 fails to start. I have edited that file to ensure the correct line is included for Bind 9.9, and I am not

Hi, We migrated the domain to AD on a ubuntu 18.04 box with samba 4.7.6. The DNS backend is DLZ We are seeing DNS issues as per below When using dnsupdate we get the following error. The server can resolve the hostname(itself) added interface eth0 ip=192.168.117.10 bcast=192.168.117.255 netmask=255.255.255.0 IPs: ['192.168.117.10'] need cache add: A server5.intdom.group 192.168.117.10

Hi everyone openSUSE 12.1 samba Version 4.0.0alpha18-GIT-30d4484 Following the wiki instructions for Samba 4, I added include "/usr/local/samba/private/named.conf"; to /etc/named.conf (the last line) The logs give: 3 23:52:50 hh3 named[5743]: Loading 'AD DNS Zone' using driver dlopen 3 23:52:50 hh3 named[5743]: dlz_dlopen failed to open library

On 2016-10-16 12:55, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 12:38:00 -0500 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I am working on my second Ubuntu 16.04.1LTS running Samba 4.5.0 with >> Bind9_DLZ. >> >> I have one machine just like this one. Same hardware, same software >> setup. First machine is

I am working on my second Ubuntu 16.04.1LTS running Samba 4.5.0 with Bind9_DLZ. I have one machine just like this one. Same hardware, same software setup. First machine is working fine. At the moment this (second) machine is not joined to the other (until I get Bind running.) I have searched log complaints. Compared settings between the two machines and despite bind running on the first one,

Hi, I'm trying to replace my current samba4/bind setup with Tridge's new DLZ bind method (s. http://blog.tridgell.net/?p=122). Instructions about how to set this up seem a little rare right now, and I'm not even sure wether this is supposed to work at all in its current state (but I'll give it a try anyway :-) What I found so far: In order to use the new dlopen DLZ you'll

Rowland, In a multi DC environment must all DC's run Bind that serve DNS? Is it sufficient to just have the SOA run Bind? Thanks. On 12/16/2014 10:07 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 16/12/14 14:43, James wrote: >> Rowland, >> >> Thanks for the reply. I believe you're right. It appears the zone >> information is retrieved from

From: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke at hauke-m.de> Without this patch a pixel clock rate above 165 MHz on a TMDS link is assumed to be dual link. This is true for DVI, but not for HDMI. HDMI supports no dual link, but it supports pixel clock rates above 165 MHz. Only activate Dual Link mode when it is actual possible. Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke at hauke-m.de> Signed-off-by: Ilia

Hi Rowland, Thank you. I think the 5 zones maybe a parsing issues somewhere. Also, the realms are in capital, must have been a typo. The UFW has been disabled and selinux is in a disbaled state /etc/bind/named.conf.options has options { directory "/var/cache/bind"; // If there is a firewall between you and nameservers you want // to talk to, you may need to

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/04/2015 08:41 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> From: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke at hauke-m.de> >> >> Without this patch a pixel clock rate above 165 MHz on a TMDS link is >> assumed to be dual link. This is true for DVI, but not for HDMI. HDMI >> supports no dual link, but it supports

Hi Rowland, The samba-tool dns zonelist 127.0.0.1 -U Administrator%xxxxxxxxxx | grep 'pszZoneName', gives Using binding ncacn_ip_tcp:127.0.0.1[,sign] Mapped to DCERPC endpoint 135 added interface eth0 ip=192.168.117.10 bcast=192.168.14.255 netmask=255.255.255.0 added interface eth0 ip=192.168.117.10 bcast=192.168.14.255 netmask=255.255.255.0 Mapped to DCERPC endpoint 1024 added interface

On 28.05.2018 13:05, Hauke Fath wrote: > On 05/28/18 11:08, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> >> >> On 28.05.2018 12:06, Hauke Fath wrote: >>> On 05/21/18 17:55, Aki Tuomi wrote: >>>> ssl_ca is used only for validating client certificates. >>> >>> But it was used (though not documented, IIRC) for validating server >>> certs, too. Since

On 28.05.2018 12:06, Hauke Fath wrote: > On 05/21/18 17:55, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> ssl_ca is used only for validating client certificates. > > But it was used (though not documented, IIRC) for validating server > certs, too. Since intermediate CA certs are usually valid a lot longer > than the server certs, having to concat the certs is awkward, at best. > > I would very

On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 13:22:07 +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Can you try if it works if you concatenate the cert and cert-chain > to single file? We'll start looking if this is misunderstanding or bug. This is a production machine, so I would rather stick with the downgrade until you've looked into the issue. I went home late yesterday. ;) Cheerio, Hauke -- The ASCII Ribbon

Hi list, after about a day of operation, dovecot 1.0alpha5 (NetBSD/i386 2.1) died on me with Dec 14 10:53:52 bounce dovecot: pipe() failed: Too many open files Dec 14 10:54:23 bounce last message repeated 279661 times Dec 14 10:56:23 bounce last message repeated 1071807 times Dec 14 10:56:59 bounce last message repeated 325386 times -- any ideas on what to tune? hauke -- /~\ The ASCII

On 28.05.2018 14:30, Hauke Fath wrote: > On Mon, 28 May 2018 13:52:01 +0300, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> I'm sure. But putting it as ssl_ca makes no sense, since it becomes >> confused what it is for. > I guess - I haven't had a need for client certs, and only ever used > ssl_ca for the server ca chain. > >> We can try restoring this as ssl_cert_chain setting in