similar to: Samba + acl,user_xattr

Hello! Sorry if I repeated. I have next problem with Samba 3.5.8 *Scenario:* - CentOS 5.5 - Mounted disk image with loop device to /mnt/.sharedDisk mount (output) /SharedDiskImage.img on /mnt/.sharedDisk type vfat (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,loop=/dev/loop0,uid=99) df -h (output) Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /SharedDiskImage.img 128M 128M 1.5K 100% /mnt/.sharedDisk -

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3667 Summary: touch rsync configure output Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: vapier@gentoo.org QAContact:

[username@localhost source]# ./configure --with-fhs --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --with-privatedir=/etc/samba --with-lockdir=/var/state/samba --localstatedir=/var --with-netatalk --with-smbmount --with-pam --with-syslog --with-sambabook --with-utmp --with-acl-support > ~/myconfig.out 2>&1 [username@localhost source]# cat ~/myconfig.out | grep acl checking for sys/acl.h... yes

Hi, I've a problem in running configure for samba 2.2.5. I'm using redhat 7.3, with ACL support from http://acl.bestbits.at/. I've tested that the ACL is working on the filesystem, and samba can find it too. Here's the error: checking if large file support can be enabled... yes checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... yes checking for ACL

I have compiled both my kernel (2.4.17) and samba (2.2.3a) to support ACL/EAs. It looks like it has gone well, but I get one message that worries me, but I don't know if it should or not. checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... yes checking for ACL support... yes Using posix ACLs checking for acl_get_perm_np... no As you can see, the last line is where my

Thanks for the help on the missing '-p1' for the acl and xattr patches. Things are configuring and making properly now. However, I couldn't help noticing this during the configure: checking whether to support ACLs... ACLs requested -- running tests checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... no checking for ACL support... yes checking ACL test results... Using posix ACLs checking for

Hi. I'm attempting to compile rsync 2.6.9 with both the acls & xattr patches on an MacBook pro (ie: Intel processor), with the latest Apple Developer Tools. While this is OS X client, I've enabled acls via "sudo /usr/bin/fsaclctl -p / -e" and rebooted, prior to attempting to compile rsync. Is there something else inherent in OS X Server perhaps, that I'm still

Dear Support, I'm newbie for this redhat 9 and samba 3.0, i having a problem on = paradox database with samba file server, can any support would like to = help. Your help is much appreciated. Will i have 30 PC running on WIn95 = & Win98 and application Corel Paradox 8. I already configure samba as = below, it having locking problems and slow. # Samba config file created using SWAT #

Dear All! Does anyone have troubles with setting hidden attribute? Read-only set and unset properly Hindden - can't set at all mount: /mnt/disk.img on /drv1 type ext4 (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,loop=/dev/loop0,acl,user_xattr) Samba 3.5.8 smb.conf ---------------------------- [global] pid directory = /opt/samba/run lock directory = /opt/samba/cache private dir = /opt/samba/cache log file =

Hello Marc, Am 24.10.2013 21:00, schrieb Marc Muehlfeld: > Hello Thoralf, > > Am 24.10.2013 20:32, schrieb "Th. S?ldenwagner": >> is it possible to hide/restrict access to the home drives of our samba >> users when accessing them directly via netbios address? >> >> The server is running at school and there are several pupils who have >> the ability

I've managed to fix the problem with copying to a samba share resulting in the "server is no longer available message". The problem was caused by the SGI libacl-2.0.9 upgrade. Seems like SGI broke some of the attr function calls from the acl lib into the attr lib. Since samba binaries tended to be linked ONLY to libacl, and not libattr this caused issues with samba. My solution on

Hi, I am trying samba4 alpha5 because I would like to use the feature of xattr for ACL. I followed the howto.txt comes with it exactly. I found that if I use user_xattr in /etc/fstab, I got "System cannot find the file specified" error very often (more than 50% of the time) when I try to create a file from a windows machine using share test (dir /data/test on samba server). If I

Documentation/ext3.txt suggests that the "user_xattr" and "acl" mount options are on by default. This doesn't seem to be the case, as the kernel deduces the default mount options from the filesystem superblock, and mke2fs does not appear to write any default mount options there. This error was spotted by Jacques de Mer. Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <dsd at

Some empirical testing shows that if I am using the idmap_ad module the template homedir parameter in smb.conf is ignored. I would just like to determine if this is the correct behaviour or if I am doing something wrong. JAB. -- Jonathan A. Buzzard Email: jonathan (at) buzzard.me.uk Fife, United Kingdom.

Hello, We have a Red Hat 5.3 SAMBA 3.0.33-3.7 Server that shares a few directories to 4 other servers. The other servers are Red Hat 5.3 and one Solaris 10 server. I configured SAMBA to do the following for each share; Force User: User1 Force Group: Group1 Create Mask: 02770 Security Mask: 02770 Directory Mask: 02770 Directory Security Mask: 02770 Inherit Permissions: Yes Inherit ACLS: Yes

Dear list, Setup is: Solaris 11 ZFS + Samba 3.5.10 What is the recommended way nowadays of performing strict permissions mapping between Samba and Windows NT 6.1 ? And a more broader question: is it desirable ? As we know ZFS has native NFSv4 ACL's and this would mean that permissions applied on Windows side should have an exact match on the ZFS side. Is it acl_xattr module still needed ?

Hi all, I'm trying to set up a samba (3.6.6, debian wheezy 64bit) member server on a 2008R2 domain. I'd like to be able to specify the uidnumbers users get on here in AD but I'm getting really erratic results. I've tried changing various range options, and as far as I can tell it works sometimes, but not others - don't know why. I have 2 users I've specifically set up,

All, I'm in the process of migrating a samba server from Solaris 10 (running 3.0.37) to Solaris 11 Express (running 3.5.5). The system is joined to a Win2k3 Active Directory. Migrating the configuration worked fine, the shares are available and everything mostly works as intended. The problem we're having is with the syntax of authentication requests from Windows client machines. On the

Samba4 with Linux and Windows clients wanting to get the same home folder data. Hi A college has students arranged with Linux home directories according to which year they belong to and which class within that year, a or b or whatever, they belong to e.g.: /home2/students/year7/year7a/student1 /home2/students/year7/year7a/student2 ... ... /home2/students/year13/year13a/student2500 To get at

I am using Samba 3.6.6 on Debian Wheezy. I want to be able to change www files on my dev server using my macbook. So I setup samba and made a share for the /var/www directory. I added the users bart & root to samba to connect. And connect using command K and then smb://192.168.2.100 (my samba server). As apache uses www-data as a user and group for the www files I use force user and