similar to: Cannot copy file to Samba share

I've been struggling for several days with an issue to which I found a number of references, but few solutions, so wanted to put my experience "out there", in the hope that others may find it useful at some time. A client company network of 10 WinXP Pro PCs and CentOS 4 server (a Fujitsu RX300x2) running Samba was last week replaced with 10 Win7 Pro PCs and a CentOS5 server

Hi, I'm bashing my head against a brick wall against a strange Win7 domain login issue. We have a Samba 3 CentOS server which for some months has been a problem free PDC for a network of about 15 Win7Pro64 clients in a school. Recently, for some reason, the following situation has now arisen: * After client PC reboot, domain login is fine. * After logging out of windows, any attempt to

Hi, I have a server which until recently was serving a domain of about 20 XP PCs in a school. Over the summer I updated Samba to 3.5.4-0.70, and replaced the desktops with new machines which are running Win7 Pro 64 bit SP1. This being a school, I have a system of mandatory group profiles set up, and all of the pupil groups curently have copies of the same mandatory profile (generated via the

Hi, I have setup postfix on my server (for my blog to send out emails) however I host my email on google apps. I want my server to be able to send emails towards my GoogleApps account but it's sending it to the user within the system (I know this is normal but I need it to be a bit different). Any Help Thanks James -- http://www.astorandblack.com -------------- next part -------------- An

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 10:26?AM Chris Clayton <chris2553 at googlemail.com> wrote: > > Hi. > > Is it likely that this fix will be sumbmitted to mainline during the ongoing 6.3 development cycle? > yes, it's already pushed to drm-misc-fixed, which then will go into the current devel cycle. I just don't know when it's the next time it will be pushed upwards, but it

On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 11:51 AM Chris Clayton <chris2553 at googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > On 20/02/2023 05:35, Ben Skeggs wrote: > > On Sun, 19 Feb 2023 at 04:55, Chris Clayton <chris2553 at googlemail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On 18/02/2023 15:19, Chris Clayton wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On

Thanks, Mark. Um, how's about from the commandline or how do I get, I guess we're still using X11, windows to load. Sorry, :<}}} Clayton >-----Original Message----- >From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On >Behalf Of Mark LaPierre >Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2014 5:50 PM >To: centos at centos.org; Mark LaPierre >Subject: Re:

On 12/14/14 21:17, Clayton Kirkwood wrote: > Thanks, Mark. Um, how's about from the commandline or how do I get, I guess we're still using X11, windows to load. > > Sorry, :<}}} > > Clayton > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On >> Behalf Of Mark LaPierre >> Sent: Sunday,

On Sun, 19 Feb 2023 at 04:55, Chris Clayton <chris2553 at googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > On 18/02/2023 15:19, Chris Clayton wrote: > > > > > > On 18/02/2023 12:25, Karol Herbst wrote: > >> On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 1:22 PM Chris Clayton <chris2553 at googlemail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On

I got some R code that I don't understand. Question as comment in code //where is t comming from, what is phi inverse rAC <- function(name, n, d, theta){ #generic function for Archimedean copula simulation illegalpar <- switch(name, clayton = (theta < 0), gumbel = (theta < 1), frank = (theta < 0), BB9 = ((theta[1] < 1) | (theta[2] < 0)), GIG = ((theta[2] < 0) |

It's a trademark issue. CentOS is not Red Hat, so they can't use Red Hat's trademarks. Nothing more, nothing less. On 14/12/14 09:50 PM, Clayton Kirkwood wrote: > Personally, I am agnostic. I've just read thru Centos documentation that > there is a big effort to remove all upstream personalities from Centos. > Personally, I don't see why RH is doing this. I would

Folks, bugs at stupidkitties.com wrote: " I was wondering if it'd be feasible to add an option (or multiple options, depending on the desired granularity) to cause rsync to treat changes in file attributes the same way it treats changes to the file's contents when it encounters hard links at the destination. Maybe something like --relink-p or something?" One of colleagues has

Personally, I am agnostic. I've just read thru Centos documentation that there is a big effort to remove all upstream personalities from Centos. Personally, I don't see why RH is doing this. I would think that it undermines RH. But I'm still new/old to all of this. It used to be the big argument was between Unix from Berkeley(4.? I think) and SysIII/V. Always always battles for turf.

Peter, I was about to post the below to the rsync mailing list, but wondered whether your code which captures rsync output may have allowed rsync to continue past what I think would normally be a fatal error? Thanks Rob. P.S. Should I put the final backups of the old pearcey /home back into their correct slots - 5 backups were recycled, but nothing was added to them? The .Snapshots area is

Hello, I have a few questions, regarding the smoothScatter function. I have a scatter plot with more than 500,000 data points for two samples. So, I am wanting to display the density in colors to convince people that my good correlation coefficient is not due to an "influential point effect" and plus, I also want to make my scatter plot look pretty. Anyway ... I have been able to

rsync watchers, I've been using rsync version 3.1.1+, and do like the improved --stats output: e.g. Number of files: 2480403 (reg: 2034290, dir: 233487, link: 212174, special: 452) Number of created files: 356 (reg: 6, dir: 3, link: 347) Number of regular files transferred: 16 ... - thanks to the developers. However, I want to be able to look at the --stats output and make a decision

On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 1:22 PM Chris Clayton <chris2553 at googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > On 15/02/2023 11:09, Karol Herbst wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 11:36 AM Linux regression tracking #update > > (Thorsten Leemhuis) <regressions at leemhuis.info> wrote: > >> > >> On 13.02.23 10:14, Chris Clayton wrote: > >>> On 13/02/2023

On 12/14/14 20:01, Clayton Kirkwood wrote: > Hello, > > It's been about 15 years since I've enjoyed working in the Unix space, and I > am trying to reintegrate myself. A few things have changed in the > intervening years. I've installed the first Centos6 iso without too much > difficulty, but I am rusty on commands and such. It appears the install > doesn't

On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote: > Hello all, > > I've been googling my brains out since yesterday looking for up-to-date > information on this matter, and have found information that is anywhere from > 15 to 5 years old. I'd really like some information that much more up to date > on the subject. Specifically configuring Sendmail SMTP authentication (_no >

Folks, Am 20.06.2016 um 22:01 schrieb Larry Irwin (gmail): > The scripts I use analyze the rsync log after it completes and then sftp's a summary to the root of the just completed rsync. > If no summary is found or the summary is that it failed, the folder rotation for that set is skipped and that folder is re-used on the subsequent rsync. > The key here is that the folder